No, Really—'Seriously?' McCain and Obama Define 'Rich'

McCain was smart not to fall into the class warfare trap.

By Sam Dealey, ContributorAug. 21, 2008
By Sam Dealey, ContributorAug. 21, 2008, at 1:59 p.m.
U.S. News & World Report

McCain, Obama, and 'Rich'

In the middle of this blog's home page is a section called "Seriously?" in which someone's comments are quoted incredulously. It currently features John McCain and his reply at Saturday's Saddleback Forum when asked to define "rich": "I think if you're just talking about income," McCain said, "how about $5 million?"

To be fair to McCain, his answer was more nuanced than that.

As soon as he said it, he gave the following qualification (note, too, his own use of the word "seriously"):

I don't think, seriously that—the point is that I'm trying to make here seriously—and I'm sure that comment will be distorted, but the point is...that we want to keep people's taxes low and increase revenues.

...So it doesn't matter really what my definition of "rich" is because I don't want to raise anybody's taxes. I really don't. In fact, I want to give working Americans a better shot at having a better life. And we all know the challenges, my friends.

McCain's answer was a good one. He refused to play the game of defining "rich," because the premise of that game is that "rich" people aren't taxed enough. The percentage of one's income forked over to the federal government is hardly the best indicator of one's contributions to the American economy—not least because it assumes lawmakers spend the money wisely. Allow individuals to retain their earnings and they invest in companies, buy new cars, or remodel their houses—all of which keeps the economy humming. As hard as it is to imagine, even nitwitted Paris Hilton has her benefits. Her spending sprees keep shops open, salespeople employed, and importers, manufacturers, marketers, and a whole host of others in business.

But what was Barack Obama's answer to what constitutes rich? A family earning $250,000. Given that he proposes raising the top marginal rate to 39.6 percent, that would mean the family is left with $151,000—and that's before local, state, property, and sales taxes.

So for Obama, leaving a family with $151,000 means they're rich? Er, "Seriously?"

Popular Articles

Thomas Jefferson Street

Trump's Carnival of Corruption

Thomas Jefferson Street

What Nunberg Tells Us About Trump

Economic Intelligence

What Trump Doesn't Get About Trade

World Report

Win the Vote, End the War

Recommended

Photos: Obama Behind the Scenes

A collection of moments during and after Barack Obama's presidency.

June 27, 2018

Political Cartoons on the Economy

Feb. 21, 2019, at 10:41 a.m.

NASA Asteroid Mission Hits Obstacle

Asteroid Bennu is throwing researchers for a loop, but they expect to stick with their 2023 deadline to return a sample to Earth.

Cecelia Smith-SchoenwalderMarch 19, 2019

West Virginia Sues Catholic Church

The lawsuit alleges that the church knowingly employed priests who had been accused of abuse.

Claire HansenMarch 19, 2019

Europeans Like the EU, Study Shows

New research shows the greatest support for the bloc is in Poland, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, France and Sweden.

Sintia RaduMarch 19, 2019

Supreme Court Rules on Detaining Immigrants

In a victory for President Trump, the court ruled in favor of detaining and deporting noncitizens for past crimes.

Lisa HagenMarch 19, 2019

Cuyahoga River Fish Are Now Safe to Eat

The Cuyahoga River last caught fire in 1969.

Megan TrimbleMarch 19, 2019

Sen. Elizabeth Warren: Get Rid of Electoral College

The senator is the latest Democratic presidential candidate to throw her support behind the reform.

Lisa HagenMarch 19, 2019

The World’s 10 Best Cities

Residents around the world ranked their cities’ food, music, affordability and more.

Casey LeinsMarch 19, 2019

Mylan Recalls Contaminated Cancer Drug

The company discovered the drug was contaminated with copper salts during a 12-month test.

Alexa LardieriMarch 19, 2019