[an error occurred while processing this directive]

advertisement

Tuesday, May 29, 2012
June 22, 2006

Spying at the salon

Should hairdressers be agents in the campaign against domestic violence? It's a close call. Several states encourage and train stylists to look for signs of abuse. It's already a bit creepy that stylists may be sizing you up and analyzing your conversation for signs that your husband or boyfriend is beating you.

It's much creepier when hairdressers are supposed to report to authorities about what they think is going on in your home. Maine has just joined the list of states that have such programs. The Bangor News reports: "The idea is that women often open up to their hairdressers, so they should be alert and report problems." If so, hairdressers are now being trained to be snitches, using rapport and friendship with their customers to gather information for authorities–for the customers' own good, of course.

How would this work? A Maine cosmetologist told the News: "You might start offering a change [of hairstyle] and she says, 'No, he would not like that' or 'He would kill me if I cut my hair.' You start to think there might be some control issues." Or, as the blog "Nobody's Business" said: "The new practice would also seem to open up the possibility of massive misunderstandings and errors. For instance, if a customer says, 'My husband would kill me if I cut my hair,' I'd bet that 9 out of 10 times, it's a mere figure of speech, with no actual bodily harm implied." But the blogger added this: "Thinking it through, though, I can't really fault the program as long as there's no obligation on the part of the hairdresser to pass on suspicions to officials." One reader of the blog wrote this: "Like you, I certainly don't have any problem with handing out information–hairdressers don't need a state program to do that now if they wish. But there will be problems if Maine wants to turn stylists into domestic-abuse cops. As a former family therapist working in the state of Illinois, I was legally required to report any abuse I suspected to the authorities whether the family wished me to or not. Not pretty for people who wanted to work out their problems (themselves). . . . At the very least though, at least I was a professional trained to understand and work with these situations as well as to make risk assessments. Hairdressers, I think, are trained to work on hair."

Posted at 12:00 PM by John Leo

John Leo
John Leo has covered the social sciences and intellectual trends for Time magazine and the New York Times. He is also the author of two books: Two Steps Ahead of the Thought Police and a book of humor, How the Russians Invented Baseball and Other Essays of Enlightenment.

advertisement

BLOG BACK

...Data Loading. (Requires javascript to be turned on)

RECENT POSTS

  • No context in 'They killed my baby!' journalism: Washington Post reporter Anthony Shadid is at it again. Shadid is the world's foremost practitioner of "They killed my baby!"...
  • Stem cell morals: Are social and religious conservatives antiscience? Many are. But resistance to public funding of stem cell research is not an...
  • Superman as Christ: The theme of Superman as a Christ figure isn't new, but it has never been stronger or more obvious than...
  • Blockading free speech: Columnist Paul Craig Roberts attended Stanford's graduation and learned something new: Back in April, President Bush went to the university...
  • Surprise! Boys are different: Wendy McElroy wrote a July 4 column strongly recommending The Dangerous Book for Boys, a surprise bestseller in Britain and...

JOHN LEO'S BLOG ARCHIVE

RSS FEEDS

JOHN LEO'S BLOG FAVORITES

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.