Posted: Feb. 1, 2003
Firestorm over Texas
The space shuttle Columbia disintegrated on its homeward journey Saturday, killing its crew of seven
BY CHARLES W. PETIT
In a spectacle that stunned a nation the space shuttle Columbia disintegrated in a multiple fireball as it streaked
across the clear blue sky over north central Texas during reentry from orbit
shortly after 9 a.m. Saturday.
A crew of seven astronautssix American and one Israeliwere aboard the shuttle, which was returning from a 16-day science mission.
There was no chance of survival. The presence on Columbia of Ilan Ramon, a former Israeli Air Force combat pilot and
his country's first astronaut, inevitably
triggered speculation about terrorism.
But NASA and other government officials rushed to say the space plane, flying at an altitude of 38 miles and a speed of
more than 12,000 miles per hour, was well beyond the reach of any terrorist's missile. Sabotage may be a remote possibility, but security at and before launch was extra tight. Instead, initial suspicions focus on a failure in the left wing, and the possibility that its heat protecting tiles were damaged by insulation seen falling from the big, external fuel
tank during launch from Kennedy Space Center two weeks ago.
A thundering roar accompanied the disaster as jagged pieces of shuttle tumbled at hypersonic speed and their sonic booms merged into a continuous rumble. A cloud lingered in the sky for hours,
drifting southeast toward Louisiana.
Many of the small pieces of debris that survived the breakup reached Earth in a swath of ground more than 100 miles
long, some in the town of Nacogdoches in east Texasone landed near a high school, another went through the roof of
a dentist's office. Officials including military units cordoned them off until federal personnel can gather them up. NASA
asked residents of east Texas and bordering areas, if they see any possible wreckage, to stay clear. One reason is the
possibility of toxic gases from propulsion and power unit fuels. More important,
they want nobody but experts to move debris, and provided a phone number (281-483-3388) to report wreckage.
The loss of the oldest of America's four space planes and its occupants not only dealt a shocking body blow to an already bruised and grieving nation's psyche, but leaves NASA and the U.S. government with a gargantuan task to keep America's program of human space flight
on track. President Bush, in a solemn, brief statement later in the morning, praised the courage of the astronauts and vowed, "The cause for which they died will continue ... our journey to space will
continue." NASA officials said, however, that until they understand the accident, they are suspending flights by America's three remaining shuttles, Atlantis, Discovery, and Endeavour.
Bill Readdy, the agency's space flight director, said the first hint of trouble for him and other top NASA officials in Florida was loss of communication with the craft over Texas, just minutes before the spacecraft's intended touchdown on its Florida runway. Gaps in communication are not rare, particularly during re-entry, when a radio-absorbing fireball envelops the craft. "We were standing along the runway getting ready to celebrate a very successful mission," he said later. Only after the shuttle had failed to appear on the radar screen or in the sky
on its final approach near the scheduled
landing time of 9:16 a.m. did the mission's
overseers in Florida know something
horrible had occurred.
But engineers watching data come in at centers in
Houston and Cape Canaveral had noted problems a few minutes earlier.
Over a period of several minutes during
re-entry, just before the spacecraft suddenly broke up, various sensors in the
shuttle's left wing went dead. Data from
sensors monitoring temperature and
pressure for the elevons, or flaps, on the
left wing were lost at 8:53 a.m. Then at 8:59,
sensors monitoring pressure and temperature of the tires in the left-wing
wheelwell also went offline. Such data
losses are not rare, and controllers say
the craft seemed to continue flying normally . "It had been a fantastic mission,"
said shuttle program manager Ron Dittemore.
NASA flight director Milt Heflin, almost overwhelmed with emotion during
a post-accident briefing, says that it was
only when he and other ground controllers tried to contact the crew in the following few minutes, including an attempt on a reliable ultra-high-frequency radio circuit, did he realize "we had a
really bad day." By that time, ordinary citizens in Texas were watching in wonder and growing horror as the space shuttle's trail across the sky shed multiple, smoking pieces.
The accident occurred when the spacecraft was under great stresses. Heating from friction with the air was at its peak,
and automated controls were putting the craft through a series of turns to help slow it down in the thin upper atmosphere. Some reports from witnesses who had watched the craft's trail over California moments earlier said it appeared
that the shuttle, encased in a cloud of
glowing plasma, may have already been
shedding pieces there. However, NASA
experts said the plasma fireball around a
shuttle is turbulent and hard to read.
They said there is, as yet, no solid evidence that it was breaking up before it approached the skies over Texas.
NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe
briefed President Bush early Saturday,
and coordinated an investigation with
multiple Federal agencies including the
new Department of Homeland Security
to collect debris. Readdy vowed, "We must find what happened, fix
it, and move on."
The loss comes almost exactly 17 years
after the previous fatal shuttle flight, the
loss of the Challenger with seven on
board at takeoff, on Jan. 28, 1986. No
shuttle flew after that accident for 2½ years. A similar delay now
would pose immense problems for the
16-country International Space Station
program, led by NASA. While Russian
vehicles can rotate crews and take supplies to the station, which now has two
American and a Russian on board, only
the shuttles can carry equipment to keep
expanding the half-built station. Columbia, the oldest of the shuttles with the
smallest cargo capacity, was not used on
the space station project.
Major questions include whether to
alter or even abandon the space station
project, and whether to replace the Columbia
with a new shuttle or accelerate development of a new generation of cargo and
human-carrying space ships. The Columbia made its first flight April 12, 1981,
and space agency leaders hoped the shuttles would remain the mainstay of U.S. human spaceflight until 2015 and perhaps many years longer.
In initial briefings, shaken NASA engineers said they must now take another
look at film of the piece of foam insulation seen tumbling from the external
tank and passing near the shuttle's left
wing at takeoff. "It looks like it impacted
the left wing somewhere between the mid
and outward portion of the span," Dittemore said. Several panels of NASA engineers had looked at the film during the
mission, he said, and concluded it was
not enough to seriously damage the
wing or the tiles covering it. His team had
told the shuttle crew to be sure to take
pictures of the external tank when it
was ejected from the shuttle upon reaching orbit, to see how much foam was lost.
But the reason was to see if the tank design needs change to prevent such loss of
insulation, not worry that it had hurt the
shuttle.
As of now, Dittemore said, NASA's officials believe that the insulation should
not have done much damage to the wing.
But, he added, "as we look at that in hindsight, the impact was on the left wing,
and certainly all the indications [of trouble during reentry] were on the left wing,
so we can't discount that there might be
a connection. But we cannot rush to judgment on it."
The Columbia, while old in years, was like all the shuttles considered to be a fresh vehicle. On its 28th mission, it was designed to fly much more often than it has. Its final flight had been on the schedule for four years, and some of its crew had trained for it that long. In its cargo bay was a sophisticated science lab called SpaceHab that kept the crew busy with experiments during the entire mission. Intended to help maintain space research momentum until the space station is complete, the mission had by all reports gone exceedingly well.
The last voice communication with the
crew came at about 9 a.m., when their instruments told about the data loss from
sensors in the left wing landing gear,
which was still folded into the wing. The
crew acknowledged to ground control
that they saw the reading. Then their
radio link went dead.