Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Nation & World

4th and Long

President Bush's Commitment of more troops to Iraq isn't just unpopular-it's a last-ditch gamble against tough odds

By Kevin Whitelaw and Anna Mulrine
Posted 1/14/07
Page 3 of 3

For all the carping, the president's critics have few of their own plans to offer. While some suggest a phased withdrawal, few can counter Bush's nightmare scenario of a hasty U.S. departure resulting in the complete collapse of the Iraqi government and "mass killings on an unimaginable scale." Democratic Sen. Joseph Biden has offered a plan to partition Iraq along sectarian lines, but many experts say the country is simply too much of a patchwork quilt for such a division. "Iraq is like a bad marriage-it's violent, but nobody is openly talking about divorce," says Vali Nasr, an expert on Iraq at the Naval Postgraduate School. "The United States cannot come in and pre-emptively divide a big Arab state." In another six months, warring Iraqis may well have achieved that objective themselves.

Marines mourn Lance Cpl. Nicholas Whyte, killed by a sniper in Ramadi.
JOAO SILVA-THE NEW YORK TIMES /REDUX

How the Game Plan Changed

ASSUMPTIONS

Before: Political progress will help defuse the insurgency and dampen levels of violence.

Now: While political progress, economic gains, and security are intertwined, political and economic progress are unlikely without a basic level of security.

Before: A majority of Iraqis will support the coalition and Iraqi efforts to build a democratic state.

Now: Iraqis are increasingly disillusioned with coalition efforts.

Before: Iraqi security forces are gaining in strength and ability to handle Iraq's security challenges.

Now: Many elements of the Iraqi security forces are in the lead but are not yet ready to handle security challenges independently.

Before: Dialogue with insurgent groups will help reduce violence.

Now: Dialogue with insurgents has not improved security and may not produce strategic gains in the current context.

Before: A majority of Iraqis and Iraqi leaders see their interests as best advanced by a unified Iraq.

Now: Many Iraqis are also advancing sectarian agendas.

OPERATIONAL SHIFTS

Before: The primary security focus was on transferring responsibility to Iraqis, with less focus on population security.

Now: The primary focus is on helping the Iraqi police and Army provide population security.

Before: Restrictive rules of engagement hindered execution of Baghdad security plan (preventing U.S. forces from going into Shiite strongholds).

Now: Iraqi leaders have committed to permissive rules of engagement (coalition forces may now go into Sadr City).

advertisement

advertisement

10 Things You Didn't Know About...

Why doesn't Barack Obama like ice cream? Find out.

Washington Whispers

Face it, you need to know the buzz in D.C., and that's where Whispers comes in.

advertisement

50 Ways to Improve Your Life

U.S. News offers tips for improving your life.

America's Best Leaders

What makes someone a great leader?

Thomas Jefferson Street

Daily insight on politics and culture from the Thomas Jefferson Street bloggers.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.