Monday, May 28, 2012

Politics

Class action crackdown

By Marianne Lavelle
Posted 2/13/05
Page 2 of 2

Other examples of what critics call lopsided justice the bill would halt: Lawyers earned $22 million for suing Thomson Consumer Electronics over TV sets with snowy images, while consumers received $50 rebates on future purchases in a 2001 settlement. That same year, lawyers won $9.25 million for suing Blockbuster over its late-fee policy; class members received coupons for free or $1-off movie rentals. And in many cases, eligible consumers do not even claim a share of a settlement because they don't know about it, the forms are complicated, or they choose not to do business with the company anymore. Under the pending law, there would be tougher scrutiny of so-called coupon settlements, and attorneys' fees would be based on the value of coupons redeemed or the amount of time spent on the case.

The bill also affects "mass torts," individual personal injury lawsuits against the same company that courts bundle together--often at a corporation's request--for efficiency's sake. That includes the litigation du jour: Vioxx, the blockbuster arthritis painkiller that Merck pulled off the market last year. Although the bill would not impinge on the 575 existing Vioxx cases, it certainly would apply to future lawsuits. Since 20 million consumers took the drug, that number could be substantial. "We haven't come close to filing the full amount of cases," says Andy Birchfield Jr., whose Montgomery, Ala., firm represents more than 100 Vioxx users who sued before the recall and is evaluating more than 10,000 inquiries from potential clients. Wall Street analysts estimate Merck's potential liability to be as high as $25 billion.

Justice, many court observers note, can move at a snail's pace in federal courts. Exxon Mobil, for example, continues to appeal a $4.5 billion judgment lodged against it 11 years ago on behalf of fishing and other businesses wiped out by the Valdez oil spill off the coast of Alaska in 1989. "People don't understand what they're giving up in this debate," says Christopher Seeger of New York, another lawyer leading the charge against Vioxx. "There will be justice in the federal system, but pharmaceutical companies will get to hold onto their money longer, and you've got a family where someone has had a heart attack that's going to be economically disadvantaged for three or four more years."

Clearly, those who want to reduce litigation have gained the upper hand in the overall tort reform debate. The class action bill is just the first of three pieces of legislation that the Bush administration is pushing. Also on deck, although much more controversial, are bills to move asbestos claims out of the courts and into a $140 billion trust fund and to restrain medical malpractice cases. Critics charge the Republicans have made tort reform a high priority to choke off the clout of the trial lawyers, among the biggest political backers of the Democrats. But the bill was able to advance only because key Democrats like Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California joined forces with the GOP.

And big-time lawsuits were already facing roadblocks, as a host of states like Michigan and Mississippi have passed laws in recent years limiting cases. Some 31 states have enacted caps on punitive damages, and 15 have provided immunity for manufacturers who can prove they didn't know a product was harmful. Eight states have made it harder to file class actions, for example, by requiring a higher court to review any judge's decision to certify a class action.

As reviled as class action lawsuits have become, some argue that even the worst ones had a role in curbing wrongdoing. Democratic Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware points to a notorious $458 million class action settlement in 1993 by major airlines accused of price fixing: Consumers were awarded flight coupons that had so many restrictions they were virtually worthless. "Guess what happened? The airlines stopped cheating people," he said during debate on the bill. "So I'll pay the bottom feeders their high fees to stop the wrongdoers from doing bad things." But for now, consumers will have to find another way to get at the big fish.

advertisement

advertisement

10 Things You Didn't Know About...

Why doesn't Barack Obama like ice cream? Find out.

Washington Whispers

Face it, you need to know the buzz in D.C., and that's where Whispers comes in.

advertisement

50 Ways to Improve Your Life

U.S. News offers tips for improving your life.

America's Best Leaders

What makes someone a great leader?

Thomas Jefferson Street

Daily insight on politics and culture from the Thomas Jefferson Street bloggers.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.