<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court</title>
    <link>http://www.usnews.com/topics/organizations/supreme_court/rss</link>
    <description>Supreme Court</description>
    <language>en-en</language>
    <copyright>2012 USNews.com</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:34:55 EST</pubDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>Prop 8 Ruling Will Be a Political Disaster for Romney and the GOP</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>The Ninth Circuit Court's ruling against Proposition 8 is political disaster for the Republican Party. </p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Brad Bannon</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/brad-bannon/2012/02/07/prop-8-ruling-will-be-a-political-disaster-for-romney-and-the-gop</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/brad-bannon/2012/02/07/prop-8-ruling-will-be-a-political-disaster-for-romney-and-the-gop</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:10:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Supreme Court: Warrant Needed for GPS Tracking </title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that police must get a warrant before using a GPS to track suspects</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/01/23/supreme-court-warrant-needed-for-gps-tracking</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/01/23/supreme-court-warrant-needed-for-gps-tracking</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:25:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Justice John Paul Stevens on How the Supreme Court Works</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>Justice Stevens discusses affirmative action, <em>Citizens United</em>, and his favorite chief justice</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Kira Zalan</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2012/01/23/justice-john-paul-stevens-on-how-the-supreme-court-works</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2012/01/23/justice-john-paul-stevens-on-how-the-supreme-court-works</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:15:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Throws Out Texas Electoral Maps </title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>The decision affects of the House of Representatives and leaves the fate of Texas' primaries unclear</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/01/20/supreme-court-throws-out-texas-electoral-maps</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/01/20/supreme-court-throws-out-texas-electoral-maps</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:20:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Supreme Court: Religious Workers Can't Sue for Job Discrimination</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>For first time, the high court has acknowledged the existence an exception to anti-discrimination laws.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/01/11/supreme-court-religious-workers-cant-sue-for-job-discrimination</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/01/11/supreme-court-religious-workers-cant-sue-for-job-discrimination</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:35:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Supreme Court to Hear Case on TV Indecency</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>Justices are hearing arguments in case that pits the Obama administration against television networks.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/01/10/supreme-court-to-hear-case-on-tv-indecency</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/01/10/supreme-court-to-hear-case-on-tv-indecency</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:15:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>2011 Was About Congress. 2012 Will be About the Supreme Court </title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>While the election rages, the Supreme Court will be in an uncomfortable spotlight in 2012.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Alex M. Parker</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/12/30/2011-was-about-congress-2012-will-be-about-the-supreme-court</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/12/30/2011-was-about-congress-2012-will-be-about-the-supreme-court</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:30:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>10 Predictions for 2012</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>What to expect in 2012 in politics, sports, and entertainment.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Scott Galupo</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/scott-galupo/2011/12/29/10-predictions-for-2012</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/scott-galupo/2011/12/29/10-predictions-for-2012</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:45:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Should the Supreme Court Rule Arizona's Immigration Law Unconstitutional?</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>The Supreme Court announces that it will hear the case against a highly controversial immigration law.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Tierney Sneed</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/12/12/should-the-supreme-court-rule-arizonas-immigration-law-unconstitutional</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/12/12/should-the-supreme-court-rule-arizonas-immigration-law-unconstitutional</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:40:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Senators Fight to Mandate TV in the Supreme Court</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>Opponents of the "Cameras in the Courtroom" bill urge deference to Supreme Court Justices.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Mallie Jane Kim</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/12/06/senators-fight-to-mandate-tv-in-the-supreme-court</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/12/06/senators-fight-to-mandate-tv-in-the-supreme-court</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:08:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Upholds No Prayer in Schools</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>Supreme Court upholds no prayer in a New York City school.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/12/06/supreme-court-upholds-no-prayer-in-schools</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/12/06/supreme-court-upholds-no-prayer-in-schools</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:35:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Obama Healthcare Law</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>The Supreme Court will decide the fate of Obama's healthcare law.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/11/14/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-obama-healthcare-law</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/11/14/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-obama-healthcare-law</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:40:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Stays Out of Dispute Over Utah Roadside Memorials</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>Justices refuse to review U.S appeals court ruling on large cross memorials in Utah.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/10/31/supreme-court-stays-out-of-dispute-over-utah-roadside-memorials</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/10/31/supreme-court-stays-out-of-dispute-over-utah-roadside-memorials</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:45:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Healthcare Law's Path Through the Supreme Court</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>Agencies,  Americans eye the healthcare law's fate. </p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Mallie Jane Kim</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/10/03/healthcare-laws-path-through-the-supreme-court</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/10/03/healthcare-laws-path-through-the-supreme-court</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:30:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>White House Confident of Supreme Court Win on Healthcare</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>Risks for GOP, president in administration's quick appeal of 11th Circuit ruling to Supreme Court.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Mallie Jane Kim</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/09/29/white-house-confident-of-supreme-court-win-on-healthcare</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/09/29/white-house-confident-of-supreme-court-win-on-healthcare</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:55:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Healthcare Law Ruling Makes a Supreme Court Case Almost Certain</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>An Appeals Court ruling makes it more likely the high court will take up the case.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Mallie Jane Kim</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/08/12/healthcare-law-ruling-makes-a-supreme-court-case-almost-certain</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/08/12/healthcare-law-ruling-makes-a-supreme-court-case-almost-certain</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:40:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Next Stop for Obamacare's Mandate: The Supreme Court</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>The court ruling that Obamacare's individual mandate is constitutional means the Supreme Court will likely have to decide on it sometime next year.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Peter Roff</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2011/06/30/next-stop-for-obamacares-mandate-the-supreme-court</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2011/06/30/next-stop-for-obamacares-mandate-the-supreme-court</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:24:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Supreme Court: Only EPA Can Regulate 'Greenhouse Gas' Emissions</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>But efforts in Congress to stop the EPA from killing jobs mean the debate is not over yet.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Peter Roff</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2011/06/21/supreme-court-only-epa-can-regulate-greenhouse-gas-emissions</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2011/06/21/supreme-court-only-epa-can-regulate-greenhouse-gas-emissions</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:22:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Democrats Can Blame Themselves for Judicial Nominees Mess</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>But Democrats have only themselves to blame.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Mary M. Shaffrey</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/Mary-Shaffrey/2011/05/23/democrats-can-blame-themselves-for-judicial-nominees-mess</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/Mary-Shaffrey/2011/05/23/democrats-can-blame-themselves-for-judicial-nominees-mess</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 12:19:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Justices Want to Keep Doors Open to Public</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>Stephen Breyer wanted to leave the doors to the high court open to visitors.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Paul Bedard</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/05/11/supreme-court-justices-want-to-keep-doors-open-to-public</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/05/11/supreme-court-justices-want-to-keep-doors-open-to-public</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 11:05:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Which Law School Grads Get the Most Judicial Clerkships?</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>Clerkships can provide a big boost for future legal employment prospects.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Robert Morse</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/college-rankings-blog/2011/04/28/which-law-school-grads-get-the-most-judicial-clerkships</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/college-rankings-blog/2011/04/28/which-law-school-grads-get-the-most-judicial-clerkships</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:05:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Tax Payer Checkoff Protects Against Corruption</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>It's time to update the Watergate reforms to keep defending against corruption.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Fred Wertheimer</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/04/11/tax-payer-check-off-protects-against-corruption</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/04/11/tax-payer-check-off-protects-against-corruption</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:38:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Defense of Marriage Act Is Constitutional</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>The Obama administration should defend this valid law.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Tony Perkins</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/03/14/the-defense-of-marriage-act-is-constitutional</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/03/14/the-defense-of-marriage-act-is-constitutional</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:14:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Defense of Marriage Act Is Unconstitutional Discrimination</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>The law is unconstitutional discrimination</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>Joe Solmonese</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/03/14/the-defense-of-marriage-act-is-unconstitutional-discrimination</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/03/14/the-defense-of-marriage-act-is-unconstitutional-discrimination</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:14:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Is the Defense of Marriage Act Constitutional?</title>
      <description>
        
        <![CDATA[
        <p>The Justice Department will no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act in court.</p>
        ]]>
      </description>
      <author>U.S. News Staff</author>
      <link>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/03/11/is-the-defense-of-marriage-act-constitutional</link>
      <guid>http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/03/11/is-the-defense-of-marriage-act-constitutional</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 06:00:00 EST</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
