Masturbation-Prostate Link: eFluxMedia Got It Wrong

April 24, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

In my last post, I called eFluxMedia on its erroneous coverage of five-year-old medical research. The publication calls itself "an online newspaper that aims to offer a public service. Its main purpose is to inform its readers correctly, impartially, and continually, according to journalistic principles." It reported today that masturbation reduces men's chance of developing prostate cancer. The story is time-stamped "13:40, April 24th, 2008."

The finding it then goes on to describe was reported by other news organization in July of 2003. In fact, eFluxMedia writer Anna Boyd paraphrased a BBC.co.uk report and a New Scientist story and pulled quotes from both of them (with attribution). Oddly, Boyd did not mention the timing of those reports or of the original medical study, referring to it only as the "latest study in this field." As I just reported, that study is no longer the latest study in the field. A very similar finding essentially confirmed the 2003 study the following year.

E-mails addressed to Anna Boyd and sent to several addresses at eFluxMedia.com were not immediately returned; at least one bounced back. A telephone number could not be found on the publication's website. If I hear back, I'll let you know.

Tags:
prostate cancer,
media

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The four-year example is that movie and road are main, meanwhile robert young takes that film is the tree while objective is the tinsel.

dell computer boise idaho of AL 10:37PM May 19, 2010

ehh. nice thread

CrordioX of AL 12:28PM December 13, 2009

You may be right about becoming addicted to masturbation, but the rest of your claims about hair loss, etc. have no scientific basis do they? Where's your proof. Give some links to those claims, if you want anyone believe what you are saying. Also, when you say "most of the guys would agree with me" about being bombarded with info that masturbation is good for you, who exactly are you referring to there? Did you do a scientifically sound survey? Maybe it kind of puts your mind in the gutter, and you can get addicted to it because it releases endorphins, but don't make false claims that have no backing, that's pure speculation on your part and it just makes the arguments that have validity (becoming addicted to it, and putting your mind in the gutter) seem just as false as the rest of your claims, good sir.

Dan of WA 1:52AM December 20, 2008

Thinking Harder

This blog is the public workshop of U.S. News writer and editor Ben Harder. In articles published in the magazine, he has covered a range of sciences, including medicine, human behavior, prehistory, and evolution. Here, he can explore those and other scientific fields more fully and more informally than is possible in print. He'll share whatever seems noteworthy or potentially useful, and he invites readers to do the same.

WTOP Audio
On Feb. 24, 2008, Ben discussed the link between artificial light and cancer on WTOP radio. Listen to the interview at WTOP News. He again talked about light pollution on WTOP on March 22, exploring its environmental effects.

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Hydrogen Gas in the Universe

Researcher believes it is key ingredient to Universe.

Chemistry and Clouds

Researchers look at water droplets and chemical reactions.

Learning and Play

Researcher studies children's unstructured playtime.