A Rectum, a Finger, and a Lawsuit in New York

January 16, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (50)

Some cases are medical. Some are legal. Some, unfortunately, end up being both. New York State's Supreme Court is poised to consider the double-sided case of Brian Persaud, a 38-year-old construction worker who has reportedly sued a New York hospital for performing a rectal exam that he says he didn't want.

After receiving a head injury, Persaud was taken to the emergency room at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, where ER docs conducted a work-up. The New York Times's blog City Room reports:

According to a lawsuit he later filed, Mr. Persaud was then told that he needed an immediate rectal examination to determine whether he had a spinal-cord injury. He adamantly objected to the procedure, he said, but was held down as he begged, "Please don't do that." As Mr. Persaud resisted, he freed one of his hands and struck a doctor, according to the suit. Then he was sedated, the suit says, with a breathing tube inserted through his mouth.

After Mr. Persaud regained consciousness, he was arrested, then taken—still in his hospital gown—to be booked on a misdemeanor assault charge. Gerrard M. Marrone, who was Mr. Persaud's lawyer, got the criminal charges dropped, then helped Mr. Persaud file a civil lawsuit against the hospital.

I don't claim to know what the court should decide—heck, all I know about the case is what I've read online (here's another news report about it). But I can certainly sympathize with any patient who feels that a doctor ignored a request. I'd like to think that I can ask any doctor why a particular test or procedure is necessary and count on getting an explanation that will enable me to make a rational decision to agree to it. In fact, I once fired a surgeon—or maybe he fired me—when he failed that test of explanation. But a patient in the ER can't necessarily walk out the way I did. That's why good doctor-patient communication is so important.

(Disclosures: The blogger is a friend of mine, and a relative is attending Weill Cornell. I have no inside information about the case.)

Tags:
patients,
doctors,
patient safety,
medical quality

Reader Comments Read all comments (50)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Should a patient decline a test or tests while in the ER one would think that yes, it would be explained EXACTLY why that certain test or test are absolutely necessary. While, no, I am not a medical professional, one would have to wonder why a digital rectal exam was so urgently necessary that they had to force the patient to receive it. Is this the only way that a medical professional can establish whether or not the patient has suffered a spinal cord injury? This seems extremely unlikely. What if the patient in question was sexually abused at a time in his or her life? Would this not be taken into consideration? There is a multitude of unfortunate situations that may have taken place but the bottom line is that the patient, much like the customer (and the patient IS the customer while in the hospital) is always right. Any physical violence in my opinion was self defense and my heart goes out to this man. yes, there could be more than one side to this story but if we take it for what it is then I say if I were on the jury I would do my best to have my fellow jurors realize how very vulnerable we are in the hospital and how it can be a living hell. I know this from my own experiences. Booked? Seriously? Does the patient have any rights? Did this happen in the United States of America? That doctor should be booked.

Dee of NJ 1:09AM May 31, 2011

The doctors should be arrested !

He should be sued and removed from his position never allowed to practice again.

Moi 12:22PM February 05, 2010

I should email my friend about this.

FogExext of AL 12:29PM December 13, 2009

Thinking Harder

This blog is the public workshop of U.S. News writer and editor Ben Harder. In articles published in the magazine, he has covered a range of sciences, including medicine, human behavior, prehistory, and evolution. Here, he can explore those and other scientific fields more fully and more informally than is possible in print. He'll share whatever seems noteworthy or potentially useful, and he invites readers to do the same.

WTOP Audio
On Feb. 24, 2008, Ben discussed the link between artificial light and cancer on WTOP radio. Listen to the interview at WTOP News. He again talked about light pollution on WTOP on March 22, exploring its environmental effects.

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Hydrogen Gas in the Universe

Researcher believes it is key ingredient to Universe.

Chemistry and Clouds

Researchers look at water droplets and chemical reactions.

Learning and Play

Researcher studies children's unstructured playtime.

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon