On the Environmental Virtues of Cohabitation

Back to blog

Babies don't cause global trashing, people cause global trashing.

People should recycle and companies shouldn't dump deadly chemicals in the water and soil.

As countries develop, they have less children per capita, look at Europe and America and compare it to any 3rd world nation.

Evan of MA @ Dec 10, 2007 14:12:14 PM

Marital status is relevant because there is a huge gap between households where children are raised by 2 married parents compared with unmarried single parents. Children not raised by 2 married parents are at higher risk for drug addiction, alcohol abuse, gang involvement, out of wedlock births, abortions, school drop-out, criminal activities, etc. All such undesirable societal consequences create additional environmental drain via greater governmental program costs, use of police resources, greater energy/oil/gasoline usage, health care costs, higher risk of AIDS, etc.

How can one even begin to tabulate the numerious societal and environmental costs resulting from all types of deviant behaviors of children and adults who grew up in broken, dysfunctional families?

of NY @ Dec 09, 2007 02:16:45 AM

Cohabiting is not so great "from an environmental standpoint." Those who cohabitate prior to marriage have a greater chance to divorce than those who don't cohabitate. Unless one makes a non-stop career out of cohabitation, then it's more likely than not that one will be alone living eventually as a divorcee, creating further environmental drain.

It is also easy to blame babies as "the new SUVs." In reality, it is not the individual person per se that is to blame but rather the materialistic and consumeristic American lifestyle that is at fault. Do we really need 5 televisions, 2 cars, 4 cell phones, and 3 computers in an average household? The real "green" challenge is for Madision Avenue and Hollywood to instill a sense of consumeristic balance via their advertisements and movies. Yes, sometimes "less" is "more."

of NY @ Dec 09, 2007 02:04:06 AM

overpopulation

As I remember, back in the late 40's or early 50's, some people were expressing concern about overpopulation. This concern was pretty well discounted. For instance, my Mother said God would take care of the problem. Yes, he will. However, I don't think in ways to our liking.

This renewed concern may be simply throwing water on the already chard remains.

Howard Davis of MD @ Dec 06, 2007 12:53:03 PM

Back to blog

Add Your Thoughts
About You

Thinking Harder

This blog is the public workshop of U.S. News writer and editor Ben Harder. In articles published in the magazine, he has covered a range of sciences, including medicine, human behavior, prehistory, and evolution. Here, he can explore those and other scientific fields more fully and more informally than is possible in print. He'll share whatever seems noteworthy or potentially useful, and he invites readers to do the same.

WTOP Audio
On Feb. 24, 2008, Ben discussed the link between artificial light and cancer on WTOP radio. Listen to the interview at WTOP News. He again talked about light pollution on WTOP on March 22, exploring its environmental effects.

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Wolves, Moose and Soil Nutrients: The Unexpected Connection

Researchers were startled to discover "hot spots" of forest fertility.

Predicting Who Will Survive Skin Cancer

Using new techniques, researchers may now be able to predict the survivability of skin cancer.

Record Highs Far Outpace Lows Across U.S.

Daily record high temperatures occurred twice as often as record lows over the past decade.

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!