Are All Invasive Species Bad?

Non-native species unfairly get a bad rap according to a new study

August 31, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

Another reason is that the harm done by an invasive species isn't always immediate. Sometimes a non-native species can arrive and live quietly for years before erupting into a full-fledged invasive species. The Brazilian pepper shrub was imported to Florida from South America in the mid-19th century as an ornamental plant, and posed no problems for nearly a century. But in the 1930s it began to spread unchecked, and now infests over 700,000 acres across Florida, the plant's dense canopy inhibiting the growth of native species.

"We're not good at figuring out which species might be damaging," Simberloff said.

But the management of invasive species usually happens on a very tight budget, said Peter Kareiva, chief scientist at The Nature Conservancy. Every day, according to Kareiva, policymakers and ecologists try to figure out which species might be harmful, which invasive species are doing the most damage, and which of these might respond best to eradication efforts.

"Most ecologists think in terms of invasive or not invasive," Kareiva said. "If a species is non-native and not invasive, then we wouldn't pay much attention to it."

Researchers have spent years trying to answer the question of what makes a non-native species become invasive, but Kareiva would like to see them answer another question.

"When invasive species first show up, can we predict which ones are going to become major modifiers of ecosystems or harm other species?" asked Kareiva.

The answer to this question may help ecologists and conservation managers take more steps to maintain native biodiversity and ecosystem functioning—the ultimate goal of all sides in this debate.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
plants,
animals

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Wow, you people are really clueless about ecology and wildlife biology. When non-native plants or animals replace native ones, it destroys the NATURAL biodiversity of that ecosystem or area. It doesn't help if the addition of non-natives makes the area more artificially diverse.

Ecosystems are usually very delicate. Introduction of non-native species is almost always harmful to ecosystems and native species, so removing the non-natives is a good thing. Stop worshiping your whiteness and get a clue: these islands were in far better shape before Europeans invaded them.

Jeff of CA 12:53PM November 17, 2012

You're gay .

Josh Junior. of MO 8:16AM October 02, 2012

Thankyou for killing our wildlife and making the world safer for mankind. I dont know what I would do knowing that deer and elk were living free on an island away from human habitation and civilization. There was no need for an impact study as there were no native species to be impacted. If eagles eat all the foxes it should surely cut down the eagle population to a safe level so that island visitors can bring their pets for a day hike.Since the foxes are gone there will be no impact on them from dogs, and human waste will be collected in portable latrines I am sure. It will be a nice form off income for the park service-until rodent infestations occur and cause the destruction of the ecosystem.

harrold of CA 8:21AM February 19, 2012

National Science Foundation

NSF

Hydrogen Gas in the Universe

Researcher believes it is key ingredient to Universe.

Chemistry and Clouds

Researchers look at water droplets and chemical reactions.

Learning and Play

Researcher studies children's unstructured playtime.

advertisement

advertisement