Deepwater Horizon Study Offers New Insight

A Deepwater Horizon study has improved understanding about the environmental impact of oil spills

July 19, 2011 RSS Feed Print

By Peter Gwynne, ISNS Contributor

(ISNS)—Two months after the deadly explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform in April 2010, a scientific team had a unique opportunity to gain some knowledge from the disaster. Working from a ship directly above the spill created by the explosion, the team used a robotic vehicle to monitor the chemical composition of the oil and gas gushing from the open wellhead.

The sampling, from almost a mile beneath the ocean surface, has yielded new and important knowledge about the environmental impact of escaping oil and gas deep in the ocean. As a result, scientists will be better able to estimate the effects of future spills on sea life.

"The research is unprecedented," said marine chemist Christopher Reddy. "It tells you what chemicals are in the oil plume and explains why. It adds to general knowledge of the area where environmental chemistry meets oceanography."

Reddy, a senior scientist at of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on Cape Cod, Massachusetts, heads a scientific team that reports on the project in today's issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The research showed that chemicals in a deep underwater spill behave quite differently from those in a surface spill.

For example, methane, benzene, naphthalene, and other "lightweight hydrocarbons" would evaporate into the atmosphere at sea level. But at the extreme depth and high pressure of the water around the spill, they either dissolved or formed new compounds with water molecules in the plume from the wellhead.

And depending on its composition, the complex mixture spewing from the well can rise, sink, or stay suspended in the water—and possibly damage sea life far from the original spill.

Those insights came from computer modeling of the samples by J. Samuel Arey, an environmental chemist at Switzerland's Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne.

"Modeling the environmental fate of hydrocarbons in deep water ecosystems required a new approach, with a global view, in order to correctly understand the impact of the pollution," Arey said.

"It underscores that every chemical in the oil has a different personality," Reddy added. "Like chemical sociologists, we saw how the parts go into the plume."

Reddy set up the project at short notice while working on a different research study in the Gulf of Mexico.

"We submitted a proposal to the National Science Foundation in the last couple of days in May and we were sailing on June 17," he recalled.

The Foundation, a government agency that funds scientific research, usually takes months to approve new projects.

On June 20, 2010, exactly two months after the explosion, Reddy and his colleagues boarded the Ocean Intervention III, a ship leased by BP with an ROV—a remotely operated vehicle. Equipped with high-definition video cameras and other sophisticated equipment, an ROV can dive far below the ocean's surface. Controlled by a pilot on the mother ship, it allows people at the surface to view events in the deep ocean.

Reddy's team equipped an ROV with a high-tech chemical sampler and sent it down to the oil leak.

"We were sitting with a little laptop watching it and told the pilot to keep moving the sampler to where the temperature of the oil and gas was hottest," Reddy recalled. "We put the sampler right in the throat of the oil coming out of the pipe and collected samples of oil and gas at 105 degrees Celsius." That compares with the 4.5-degree temperature of the water beyond the plume.

On board, the team felt an air of anticipation. "There were flames, heat, and the smell of oil," Reddy recalled. "It was a pretty exciting night."

Reddy praised the skill of the ROV pilots. "These guys are real pros," he said. "They're underwater mechanics who work for the oil industry. But they had never worked on a scientific project.

Reddy also had a good word for BP, the company using the Deepwater Horizon when the explosion occurred. "They were very generous with us and didn't charge us for use of the ROV," he said.

Back at his laboratory in Massachusetts, Reddy analyzed the samples gathered by the ROV. He then sent the raw data to Arey, who had previously served as his postdoctoral student, for further study. "His skills are honed at chemicals and seeing where they should go," Reddy explained. "I saw we would need Sam on the team."

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
environment,
Gulf of Mexico,
oil

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Oil Spill Eater II There was a non toxic Alternative to clean up the spill that has been successfully tested by BP after 10 months of spill damages. The Coast Guard sent a letter from headquarters stating to the FOSC to take action with OSE II, and the EPA, Lisa Jackson stopped the Coast Guard from allowing BP from implementing OSE II. In fact the EPA stopped the application of OSE II 11 times denying State Senators direct request for use of OSE II from Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. La Department of environmental requested the use of OSE II as well, EPA's Sam Coleman denied their request without reason. Governor Jindal tried to get OSE II demonstrated on the Chandelier Islands on May 6, 2010, and the EPA stopped the Governor as well. The EPA in fact stopped the use of OSE II 11 times, without a reason given. Had the EPA allowed Governor Jindal to allow the demonstration of OSE II on May 6, 2010, it is possible a significant portion of the environmental damages, including the shorelines and the seafood industry would have been spared. The toxicty test comparison between OSE II and corexit really cannot be compared since with corexit, the label states it can cause red blood cells to burst, kidney, and liver problems if a chemical suit and respirator are not worn. OSE II in contrast can be used to wash your hands and is non toxic. The BP Deep Horizon spill has proven that corexit only sinks oil and causes the same oil to be addressed a second time when it comes ashore as under water plumes, or tar balls, while OSE II has a substantiated end point of converting oil to CO2 and water. See Coast Guard letter below

U. S. Department

of Homeland Security

United States

Coast Guard

Commanding Officer 1 Chelsea Street

U. S. Coast Guard New London, CT 06320

Research and Development Center Staff Symbol: Contracting Office

Phone: (860) 271-2807

July 10, 2010

OSEI Corporation

P.O. Box 515429

Dallas, TX 75251

Attn: Steven Pedigo, President/Owner

DEEPWATER HORIZON RESPONSE BAA HSCG32-10-R-R00019, TRACKING #2003954

We are pleased to inform you that the initial screening of your White Paper submitted under Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) HSCG32-10-R-R00019 has been completed. It has been determined that your White Paper submission has a potential for benefit to the spill response effort.

Your White Paper has been forwarded to the Deepwater Horizon Response Federal On-Scene Coordinator (FOSC) for further action under its authority. Subject to the constraints and needs of the ongoing oil spill response, you may be contacted by the FOSC or the responsible party.

We appreciate your interest in supporting the Deepwater Horizon Response effort.

Contracting Officer /s/

USCG R&D Center

ChaceSmith of TX 10:26PM July 19, 2011

National Science Foundation

NSF

Science of Spatial Learning

Center seeks to transform teaching practices.

Studying Carbon in Rivers

Researcher explores physical, chemical and biological interactions.

Challenge: Quantum Computers

CAREER awardee focuses on what they can and cannot do.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement