Animals Aging Well

'Ageless' animals give scientists clues on how to overcome the aging process

March 2, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (1)

By Carrie Arnold, Inside Science News Service

(ISNS)—Ornithologist Ian Nisbet loves to share two photos of himself with his beloved terns.

The first photo is from 1973, when a dark-haired and spry Nisbet was banding chicks of the small sea bird off the rocky Cape Cod coast. The second photo was taken 33 years later and shows a grizzled, silver-haired Nisbet holding a 29 year old tern, one of the oldest on record. Nisbet's body shows common signs of wear and tear—gray hair, wrinkles, achy joints. The tern, however, shows none of these outward signs, despite being the equivalent of a human centenarian.

"The Holy Grail of gerontology is finding how to prevent or reverse aging, and seabirds have discovered some of that," Nisbet said. "We just wish we knew what exactly that was."

Terns don't even demonstrate diminished physical abilities as they age. They aren't the only animals that have combined a long lifespan with minimal signs of aging; other seabirds, alligators, crocodiles, and some tortoises also seem to sip from the Fountain of Youth. Although medical advances have extended the human lifespan, these same advances haven't been able to prevent the inimical onslaught of old age. Scientists hope that by studying the secrets of ageless critters, humans will one day be able to pause the hands of time.

The average American born in 2007 will live for 77.9 years, according for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Humans weren't always so long-lived—even just a century ago, the average lifespan was 49.2 years. Clearly, technology has dramatically altered aging in humans.

Annette Baudisch, a biologist at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock, Germany, used detailed mathematical models to show that all of these medical and technological advances have ironically increased the speed with which people experience of the consequences of the aging process.

Aging, Baudisch said, is simply the process of growing older. All plants and animals get older. The main difference between humans and organisms like common terns is how growing older affects the risk of dying.

Before medical and technological advances like clean water, vaccines, and better living conditions dramatically altered lifespan, humans were more likely to die during infancy, childhood, and young adulthood. This pattern meant that fewer humans survived to die at older ages, and that the overall percentage of humans dying old was much lower than in modern populations in the industrialized world. By plotting the risk of death over time, Baudisch found that each animal species has its own unique shape. There's even variation among groups of humans. For hunter-gatherers, the shape looked something like a lopsided U: relatively high during infancy, decreasing somewhat during adolescence and young adulthood, and then increasing again with age, but the shape for modern humans  looks entirely different. Baudisch's models, which she published on February 14 in Trends in Ecology and Evolution found that risk of death for modern Swedes remained very flat and very low until the population reached its 50s and 60s, whereupon it dramatically zoomed skyward.

Instead of viewing the dramatic increase in risk of death with aging as a curse, Baudisch sees it as "a luxury that we can show this much aging without getting eaten by a tiger."

In some animals, like freshwater hydras, risk of death remains pretty constant during life. For other animals, like the tern, the risk of death actually decreases with age. It seems almost counter-intuitive: an older tern is less likely to die than a younger one.

"My 29-year-old tern was still breeding," Nisbet said. The oldest terns produced the healthiest offspring and were actually more likely to survive the year than younger terns.

In a 2005 article in Physiology, biologists João Pedro de Magalhães of the University of Liverpool and George Church of Harvard University said that natural selection optimizes reproduction, not aging. After an animal has raised its offspring, the additional population places a strain on limited resources. An aging and dying parent, then, can benefit its offspring. However, de Magalhães noted, animals that don't appear to age produce more robust offspring as they get older, which makes it more advantageous for them to continue to reproduce.

Tags:
aging,
research,
animals,
biology

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

There is an excellent book called Food and Healing. In it, the author notes a study of more ancient people who had lived in South America. The study noted that from their skeletal remains, their teeth had no evidence whatsoever of cavities. Apparently bones can be analyzed, and the diet discovered. They ate a well balanced plant diet, with some animal protein.

There is an enormous difference between more ancient populations which ate naturally, from either the plant or animal kingdom. There were no processed foods, water was pure and no 'junk' foods as today. Also, from what I have read, they were physically active their entire lives.

Something which struck me in the article was that 'risk of death for modern Swedes remained very flat and very low until the population reached its 50s and 60s, whereupon it dramatically zoomed skyward.' I wonder if this is due to lack of motivation and movement in older Swedish population ... in short love of life ?

Tim B of WA 8:42PM March 20, 2011

National Science Foundation

NSF

Hydrogen Gas in the Universe

Researcher believes it is key ingredient to Universe.

Chemistry and Clouds

Researchers look at water droplets and chemical reactions.

Learning and Play

Researcher studies children's unstructured playtime.

advertisement

advertisement