Half of Adult Males Carry HPV

Human papillomavirus lingers for months in men, study shows

March 1, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

By Nathan Seppa, Science News

The virus notorious for causing cervical cancer in women also turns up frequently in men and can hang on unnoticed for months or even years, researchers report online March 1 in Lancet. The study solidifies earlier research indicating that human papillomavirus is highly prevalent in men and strengthens the case for vaccinating men and boys against it, the report’s authors say.

There are dozens of types of HPV, including more than 40 that can be transmitted sexually. Some can cause cancer. Two vaccines, Merck’s Gardasil and GlaxoSmithKline’s Cervarix protect against two types of cancer-causing HPV. Both vaccines are approved and recommended for girls and young women. Gardasil is also recommended for boys up to age 18 since its protection extends to two additional types of HPV that cause genital warts in males and females.

It’s widely assumed that limiting the virus in men or women would diminish its spread in the whole population. But while HPV has been extensively studied in women, its prevalence is less well understood in men, says Joseph Monsonego of the Institute of the Cervix in Paris, writing in the same Lancet issue. For that reason, he says, the new study results “are of substantial interest.”

Starting in 2005, epidemiologist Anna Giuliano of the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute in Tampa, Fla., and an international team of researchers recruited more than 4,000 men living in Brazil, Mexico and Florida into a study of HPV. The new study reports on the first 1,159 of these volunteers. Their average age was 32 and none had been vaccinated against HPV. Swabs of the penis and genital area of each man revealed that 50 percent were infected with at least one HPV type upon enrollment.

The researchers repeated these exams every six months, and the men completed personal-history questionnaires. Over a median of 28 months, the group acquired 1,572 new HPV infections.

The human immune system can clear HPV out of the body, and the men wiped out most of their new infections during the study period. But it took a median 7.5 months. Median clearance times didn’t vary substantially among the countries, but did vary between HPV types. Some cases lingered as long as 24 months in the men.

HPV 16 is the type responsible for the most cervical cancers in women and is covered by both vaccines. It took a median of 12 months to clear. “It’s hanging around longer, and it’s completely asymptomatic,” Giuliano says. “You don’t even know you have it.” This silent infection means a person can transmit this HPV type for longer periods and “might help explain why HPV 16 is one of the most common types in both men and women,” she says.

The data also reveal that men who reported having 10 or more sexual partners in their lifetimes had roughly twice as many HPV infections as did men who had had one partner.

Giuliano says many insurance programs cover HPV vaccination in boys up to age 18.

Male circumcision and the use of condoms have shown little protection against HPV infection, Monsonego says. “HPV vaccination in men will protect not only them but will also have implications for their sexual partners,” he says.

Giuliano says she expects to have data on the full group in three years.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
human papillomavirus,
cervical cancer,
infections,
infectious diseases,
sexual health,
men's health

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Dave, it would be instructive indeed if this study had actually showed that, and I can see how you would think that after reading what was reported in the U.S. News story: "Male circumcision and the use of condoms have shown little protection against HPV infection, Monsonego says."

But if you go back and look at Monsonego's actual "Comment" entry in the Lancet, what he wrote was this: "However, circumcision and condom use have not been clearly shown to fully protect against

either HPV acquisition or clearance in male genital sites ..." The difference between "little protection" and "not .. fully protect" is pretty big, and U.S. News should probably write a correction.

You also should realize that Monsonego only wrote a comment on this study - he wasn't one of the researchers who actually performed the study. The lead researcher/first author of this study, Giuliano, wrote this about circumcision and HPV in a separate article two months ago in The Lancet: "In view of the increased evidence from randomised trials that male circumcision reduces risk of some sexually transmitted viral infections in men and in female partners, medical and public health organisations should take a firmer stand on recommendations for male circumcision."

anon 10:34PM March 10, 2011

It is instructive that this population based study shows that male circumcision has little effect on HPV acquisition. Another study published earlier this year that looked at men on 5 continents showed the same thing. That study got no publicity. But one by circumcision advocates from Uganda that purported to show a great reduction in HPV acquisition among the newly circumcised there got a ton of media attention. Too bad the public is so often bamboozled by pro-circumcision rhetoric frpm those who have everything to gain by pushing a needless, damaging surgery. Vaccinating boys and men as well as girls and women is the only rational way to reduce HPV in the general population. Circumcision is no answer at all.

Dave of GA 7:05PM March 01, 2011

National Science Foundation

NSF

Hydrogen Gas in the Universe

Researcher believes it is key ingredient to Universe.

Chemistry and Clouds

Researchers look at water droplets and chemical reactions.

Learning and Play

Researcher studies children's unstructured playtime.

advertisement

advertisement