Shrinking Snow and Ice Cover Intensify Global Warming

New research shows that the decreases in Earth's snow and ice cover over the past 30 years have exacerbated global warming more than models predict they should have, on average

January 20, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

ANN ARBOR, Mich.—The decreases in Earth's snow and ice cover over the past 30 years have exacerbated global warming more than models predict they should have, on average, new research from the University of Michigan shows.

To conduct this study, Mark Flanner, assistant professor in the Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, analyzed satellite data showing snow and ice during the past three decades in the Northern Hemisphere, which holds the majority of the planet's frozen surface area. The research is newly published online in Nature Geoscience.

Snow and ice reflect the sun's light and heat back to space, causing an atmospheric cooling effect. But as the planet warms, more ice melts and in some cases, less snow falls, exposing additional ground and water that absorb more heat, amplifying the effects of warmer temperatures. This change in reflectance contributes to what's called "albedo feedback," one of the main positive feedback mechanisms adding fuel to the planet's warming trend. The strongest positive feedback is from atmospheric water vapor, and cloud changes may also enhance warming.

"If the Earth were just a static rock, we could calculate precisely what the level of warming would be, given a perturbation to the system. But because of these feedback mechanisms we don't know exactly how the climate will respond to increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide," Flanner said.

"Our analysis of snow and sea ice changes over the last 30 years indicates that this cryospheric feedback is almost twice as strong as what models have simulated. The implication is that Earth's climate may be more sensitive to increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide and other perturbations than models predict."

The cryosphere is the planet's layer of snow, sea ice and permanent ice sheets.

In the Northern Hemisphere since 1979, the average temperature rose by about 0.7 degrees Celsius, whereas the global average temperature rose by about 0.45 degrees, Flanner said.

For every 1 degree Celsius rise in the Northern Hemisphere, Flanner and his colleagues calculated an average of 0.6 fewer watts of solar radiation reflected to space per square meter because of reduced snow and sea ice cover. In the 18 models taken into consideration by the International Panel on Climate Change, the average was 0.25 watts per square meter per degree Celsius over the same time period.

Flanner points out that the models typically calculate this feedback over 100 years—significantly longer than this study, which could account for some of the discrepancy. Satellite data only goes back 30 years.

To further put the results in context, each square meter of Earth absorbs an average of 240 watts of solar radiation. These new calculations show that the Northern Hemisphere cryosphere is reflecting .45 watts less per square meter now than it did in 1979, due mostly to reduced spring snow cover and summer sea ice.

"The cryospheric albedo feedback is a relatively small player globally, but it's been a surprisingly strong feedback mechanism over the past 30 years," Flanner said. "A feedback of this magnitude would translate into roughly 15 percent more warming, given current understanding of other feedback mechanisms."

To avoid the worst effects of climate change, the scientific consensus is that the global average temperature should stay within 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, of pre-industrial levels. Scientists are still trying to quantify the extent to which the planet will warm as greenhouse gases accumulate in the atmosphere.

"People sometimes criticize models for being too sensitive to climate perturbations" Flanner said. "With respect to cryospheric changes, however, observations suggest the models are a bit sluggish."

The paper is called "Radiative forcing and albedo feedback from the Northern Hemisphere cryosphere between 1979 and 2008." Other contributors are: Karen Shell, assistant professor in the College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences at Oregon State University; and Don Perovich, a research geophysicist at U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. This research is funded by the National Science Foundation.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
weather,
global warming,
environment

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If we eventually reach a point 20 or 30 years from now, where our scientists and politicians are trying to tell us "Sorry, but global warming is happening much faster than we anticipated, and now we are facing global calamity as a result because we weren't able to act in time, but it is not our fault because we simply didn't know enough to make accurate predictions", DO NOT LISTEN TO THEM, BECAUSE THEY WILL BE LYING THROUGH THEIR TEETH !!! Because we can ALWAYS adjust our climate models in an ongoing way by introducing unknown factors into the equations which govern our models, by using real time climate measurements along the way to generate these unknowns, and thereby produce reasonably accurate climate models without ever actually knowing the reason for these inaccuracies in the first place. All we really have to know is how much these climate models are off by using real time measurements, in order to make the necessary adjustments to our models which can and should yield increasingly accurate climate predictions every step of the way. - Rick Carter

Rick Carter of MD 8:35AM July 17, 2011

Fixing our models is a very easy thing to do, even if we don't know why they are off in their predictions in the first place, and it is something which should endeavor to do on a continuous basis. We simply need to determine how much they are off with some reasonable degree of certainty, and then introduce unknown factors into these equations which govern our models until we can finally determine the basis for these inaccuracies. Unknowns should never be allowed to hold us up when it comes to making accurate predictions regarding future threat of global warming, because we can always introduce unknown factors into these equations which in turn compensate for any inaccuracies, once we have a reasonable estimate about the degree of these inaccuracies based upon ongoing measurements of our climate.

Rick Carter of MD 8:06AM July 17, 2011

Here you can see the alarming decrease in snow cover: h/t Steve

http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_seasonal.php?ui_set=namgnld&ui_season=1

Michael D Smith of IL 11:13AM February 05, 2011

National Science Foundation

NSF

Hydrogen Gas in the Universe

Researcher believes it is key ingredient to Universe.

Chemistry and Clouds

Researchers look at water droplets and chemical reactions.

Learning and Play

Researcher studies children's unstructured playtime.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement