Researcher Finds Power and Corruption May Be Good for Society

Study finds that that power and corruption may play a role in maintaining overall societal cooperation

December 17, 2010 RSS Feed Print

KNOXVILLE—They are familiar scenes: politicians bemoaning the death of family values only for extramarital affairs to be unveiled or politicians preaching financial sacrifice while their expense accounts fatten up.

Moral corruption and power asymmetries are pervasive in human societies, but as it turns out, that may not be such a bad thing.

Francisco Úbeda, an evolutionary biology professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and Edgar Duéñez of Harvard University found that power and corruption may play a role in maintaining overall societal cooperation.

A report of their research is published in the journal Evolution and can be viewed online.

Using game theory, Úbeda and Duéñez looked at what causes individuals in society to cooperate even though those in charge display some level of corruption. They developed a model that allows individuals who are responsible for punishing noncooperators (e.g., law enforcers and government officials) to fail to cooperate themselves by acting in a corrupt manner. They also considered the possibility that these law enforcers, by virtue of their positions, are able to sidestep punishment when they are caught failing to cooperate.

What they found is that the bulk of society cooperates because there are law enforcers forcing them to stay in line. People tend to cooperate because they do not want to get punished.

Even if the law enforcers consider themselves above the law and behave in a corrupt way, overall societal cooperation is maintained – as long as there is a small amount of power and corruption. However, if the law enforcers have too much power and corruption runs rampant, overall societal cooperation breaks down.

Úbeda explained how it works:

“Law enforcers often enjoy privileges that allow them to avoid the full force of the law when they breach it. Law enforcing results in the general public abiding by the law. Thus law enforcers enjoy the benefits of a lawful society and are compensated for their law enforcing by being able to dodge the law,” he said.

The researchers concluded that power and corruption benefit society; without law enforcers, individuals have less incentive to cooperate and without power and corruption, law enforcers have less incentive to do their job.

The researchers’ findings have far-reaching implications. In biology, they may help explain corrupt behaviors in social insects. In economics, the findings may aid in formulating policies by providing insights on how to harness corruption to benefit society. In the field of psychology, the findings provide a justification to the correlation between power and corruption observed in humans.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
community,
corruption,
research

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"without power and corruption, law enforcers have less incentive to do their job." Maybe for some... but how about other incentives like big salaries[for judges, etc.], job benefits, even altruistic motives [like I'm helping people.] Some people like being bossy, doesnt mean they want to be corrupt.

It seems like a very simplistic model and assumes all law-enforcers [from school crossing guards to Supreme Court judges] all have the same motives.

Matt of CA 8:03PM December 17, 2010

I must be psychic. Just from the title I guessed the authors were Hispanic. Sometimes you just know. I read about an economic study that demonstrated that illegal immigration creates jobs for American citizens. Once again I was amazingly prescient about the authors.

Lther of LA 4:30PM December 17, 2010

". . .without power and corruption, law enforcers have less incentive to do their job." This is ridiculous; and rampant in New Jersey and other places, but there is never a justification for it.

Are the authors saying that Gibbons was wrong in attributing the fall of the Roman Empire--partly--to corruption in the Roman character?

Law enforcement gets away with things because of the difficulty of questioning their actions. If they didn't have police unions that made internal affairs departments impotent; corrupt politicians that want the police on their side; and idiotic, misguided or corrupt judges and prosecutors that look at the police as brethren in their holy "justice department" then, and only then, could I guarantee you that they'd march to a different drummer. Corruption, at least in the U.S., has never been considered a necessity for cops to do their job. Why doesn't this far-fetched theory apply to priests? Let's allow them to be corrupt and maybe the flock will fall in line? Ridiculous!

Finally, whom do you respect more? If I keep seeing that cops let people go because the perpetrators wave PBA cards, how do you think I'll behave when the cops ask for my cooperation--cooperation that makes their jobs easier? Also, how well do you think that I'd support salary increases for such individuals? Eventually corruption will backfire and if we fall like the Roman Empire because of it, well, perhaps next time we'll find a way to disincentivize.

PublicLobbyist of NJ 2:55PM December 17, 2010

National Science Foundation

NSF

Science of Spatial Learning

Center seeks to transform teaching practices.

Studying Carbon in Rivers

Researcher explores physical, chemical and biological interactions.

Challenge: Quantum Computers

CAREER awardee focuses on what they can and cannot do.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement