Where's the Gulf Oil? In the Food Web, Study Says

Scientists tracked how oil from the BP spill quickly became dinner for plankton, entering the food web

November 8, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Seth Borenstein, Associated Press

WASHINGTON—Scientists say they have for the first time tracked how certain nontoxic elements of oil from the BP spill quickly became dinner for plankton, entering the food web in the Gulf of Mexico.

The new study sheds light on two key questions about the aftermath of the 172 million-gallon spill in April: What happened to the oil that once covered the water's surface and will it work its way into the diets of Gulf marine life?

"Everybody is making a huge deal of where did the oil go," said chief study author William "Monty" Graham, a plankton expert at the Dauphin Island Sea Lab in Alabama. "It just became food."

The study didn't specifically track the toxic components of the oil that has people worried. It focused on the way the basic element carbon moved through the beginnings of the all-important food web. Graham said the "eye-opening" speed of how the oil components moved through the ecosystem may affect the overall health of the Gulf.

Michael Crosby of the Mote Marine Laboratory in Florida didn't take part in the study but said what fascinated him was that the carbon zipped through the food web faster than scientists expected. That in itself isn't alarming, but if the nontoxic part of the oil is moving so rapidly through the food web, Crosby asks: "What has happened to the toxic compounds of the released oil?"

Graham said it was too hard to study the toxins in tiny plankton, which are plant and animal life, usually microscopic. So he had to go with an indicator that's easier to track: the ratio of different types of carbon in microbes and plankton around and even under the BP oil slick. That important ratio jumped 20 percent, showing oil in the food web.

By late September the carbon ratios in microscopic life had returned to normal, Graham said.

Graham emphasized that the results of his research don't mean the plankton, the fish that feed on it or the people who eat Gulf seafood are at any risk. What he found, he said, is merely a biomarker that shows the movement of spill-related carbon through the food chain. Much of the plankton he studied was "swimming around and doing great" and in equal or higher numbers than before the spill, he said.

Graham's study, released Monday, is published in Environmental Research Letters. It was mostly funded by the National Science Foundation, with additional money from the state of Alabama and BP's Gulf Research Initiative, which distributed money through the Northern Gulf Institute in Mississippi.

For Graham it's noteworthy how voracious the oil-munching bacteria were: "The microbes came to the rescue." After they snacked on the surface oil, other microscopic sea life ate the microbes and were, in turn, chomped on by zooplankton, tiny animals.

Larry McKinney, director of a Gulf research institute at Texas A&M University in Corpus Christi, said the study confirms what scientists had expected. The big question is will it affect eggs and larvae and next year's production of shrimp, crabs and fish, McKinney said.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
water,
food safety,
bacteria,
oceans,
fish,
water safety,
BP,
environment,
Gulf of Mexico,
health,
oil,
safety

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Uh, all you marine biologists please take note.

More oil, by a factor of 50, seeps into the sea every year from "naturally" occurring fissures than from anthropogenic extraction and transport. I note that the amount of "natural seepage would at least double if offshore drilling were discontinued. With those two little facts in mind it should be quite easy to deduce that this is a problem that nature has handled for millions of years and perhaps you could find something else to worry over.

I'm quite certain that Green Peace, The Sierra Club and the Center of Biological Diversity could provide you with an endless list of worries and millions of dollars of funding from "litigation profits" ( That's money stolen from consumers - in case you're wondering) , for your biased research.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 12:50PM November 08, 2010

June 16th - 2010, on U.S. News the following regarding the "irreparable damage to the Gulf"...:

"No, I'm thinkin' 12 - 18 months after the leaking stops all will be well. Bacterial action will breakdown the natural oil - as it has always done. The warm water will speed it (the process) up considerably...."

Dang! I'm smart. When is somebody gonna start payin' me? Unfortunately, that is a rhetorical question.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 12:33PM November 08, 2010

National Science Foundation

NSF

Science of Spatial Learning

Center seeks to transform teaching practices.

Studying Carbon in Rivers

Researcher explores physical, chemical and biological interactions.

Challenge: Quantum Computers

CAREER awardee focuses on what they can and cannot do.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement