Climate Changes, and There Goes the Neighborhood

Ranges of rattlers and voles likely to shift drastically with warming

October 18, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

By Susan Milius, Science News

PITTSBURGH—Rattlesnakes and voles could be facing real estate meltdowns of their own, as climate change forecloses habitats or shifts livable conditions into new regions at speeds as much as a thousand times faster than prehistoric averages.

Even if global average temperatures increase by only 1.1 degrees Celsius by 2100, a level of warming considered virtually inevitable by climate scientists, 11 species of rattlesnakes across North America will have to cope with their ranges dislocating by 430 meters per year on average, paleobiogeographer Michelle Lawing of Indiana University in Bloomington said October 10 at the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology's annual meeting.

If a more extreme scenario of 6.4 degrees C of warming turns out to be accurate, shrinkage and shifts for rattlesnake ranges will average 2,420 meters annually, she and David Polly, also of Indiana, have predicted.

At that pace the warming could simply outrun rattlesnakes' ability to adapt, Lawing said. She and Polly calculate that during the past 230,000 years, a period that includes three ice ages, rattlesnake ranges have shifted an average of only 2.3 meters annually.

Lawing and Polly estimated how snake ranges varied during past climate dramas by characterizing the temperatures and precipitation patterns that prevail in the species' ranges today and then figuring out where those conditions would have existed in the past. Rattlesnakes made a good case study, Lawing said, because reptiles depend on their environment for heating and cooling and may be especially sensitive to climate disruptions. Finding relevant snake fossils to study is difficult, Lawing said, but those found so far do fit within the ranges predicted for their time.

Christian Kammerer of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City raised the question of whether rattlesnakes will basically just shift north as climate warms, a pattern already detected in some marine organisms along the West Coast. It's unlikely to be that simple, Lawing said, because on land precipitation changes are also a factor, and snake ranges appear to be contracting as well as moving.

A story similar to the snakes' appears in the history of range change for voles scurrying along the West Coast, paleoecologist Jenny McGuire of the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham, N.C., said in an October 11 presentation.

During the past century's warming, long-tailed voles in Yosemite National Park have moved up mountain slopes an average of 6 meters per year after 700 years of range movements of only 1.2 meters per year, McGuire reported. Her work incorporated data from fossil sites, where she had to work out a way to distinguish among five vole species just by the shape of their first lower molars.

Closely related vole species have responded to climate changes in individual ways. While long-tailed voles retreated, California voles appeared not to have changed their range much at all during the past 800 years.

Yet when she scrutinized teeth from California voles further, McGuire found that a form that is apparently adapted to drier conditions has replaced other forms of the species over most of the state. The diversity of California voles that once existed statewide now remains mostly around San Francisco.

Checking the fossil record is important for verifying ideas about past niches, because modeling them rests on assumptions that can go awry, says paleoecologist Rebecca Terry of Stanford University. For example, working backward from a species' current address assumes that the modern population occupies all of its prime habitat and has not lost ground to people.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
endangered species,
global warming,
environment,
animals

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This important research is just one element that shows that even a small change in global average temperature can have significant impacts - and that many of them are not so obvious. I don't know how serious the disappearance of each species of vole and snake is, but I am not willing to say it is without any human impact.

Now for rebuttals:

(1) WMD were not found; the smoking gun of AGW has been found in tropospheric warming with stratospheric cooling. CO2 has been known to be a greenhouse gas for the past 150 years. You dump more into the atmosphere, eventually, the carbon sinks and the temperature sinks will fill up and you will have a "thermal overflow."

(2) I don't recall any of the scientists claiming that humans would be extinct in a generation or two ("we told our kids they wouldn't have children..."). But, with sea level rise - a measured fact - could wipe some small, low-lying island nations off the map.

(3) If you condemned your children's future to a "Death by CO2" then you were going beyond predictions in any IPCC report. The potential impacts do involve a reduction in biodiversity, human population dislocations, water shortages and dislocations of food production areas.

(4) As for climatologists, I've seen no reports where they have abused children, and even the U of E Anglia scientists have been cleared by multiple investigations. That whole issue has not changed the integrity of the science. Journalists, well, that's another matter altogether (just kidding); it really depends on the character of each one.

(5) Who hates who is irrelevant. While all the haters hate each other, shouting in uppercase, CO2 concentrations are headed to an estimated 450ppm, forcing the climate to fry the brains of those who hate and those who love them anyway. Physical processes don't care who likes you.

(6) Preserve, protect and respect the planet all right, using the best available knowledge.

How many red herrings, straw men and ad hominems does it take to make a rant? Meme Mine's reasoning reminds me of an old Star Trek quote where Spock says "logic is a field of pretty flowers, ... which smell bad." His or her logic is just as impenetrable.

And even though the jobs argument was not broached, green, renewable energy jobs pay well, just like extractive jobs in oil, gas, and mining. Plus, they are a lot safer and less destructive.

Bill744 of CO 1:35PM November 05, 2010

Then we might have a cute little rodent with poisonous fangs and a rattle on it's tail. And if we crossed that with a California condor and gave it some growth hormone therapy to make it like fifty feet long, that would be sooo cool. Mix in some of those hairless cat genes, and voila'! A giant version of Nancy Pelosi.

Dr. Moreau 8:13PM October 18, 2010

I refuse to sell my soul on the CO2 issue any longer. The new energy we need now is love, not windmills. I am a progressive-liberal and a former CO2 theory believer and now a part of the rising wave of GREEN “CO2 fear mongering” deniers. I suggest you faded doomers do the same. The Carbon issue was our Iraq War of WMD lies and obviously, as we see now, wasn’t sustainable with the consensus that counts, with the voters.. So were we the new neocons. We told our kids they wouldn’t have children because there was a climate emergency that “they” needed to fight it to survive. We acted like fear mongering climate cowards condemning our children’s future to a “Death by CO2“. Climate change has done to us what Bush did to the Republican neocons. Are you embarrassed yet? Good. Now it’s safe to say that climatologists and journalists were to science and journalism what abusive priests were to the Catholic Church. Worse still, the Green movement hated “ANYONE” with money, wealth and waste. Not just Jews, as the “you know who’s” did.

Preserve, protect and respect the planet, not save and rescue it from a false war.

We should have stopped spreading fear and lies like we were Bush Jr. babies and instead lead by example for our kids by facing the future with courage, not fear!

Lets’ be REAL liberals again: SYSTEM CHANGE, NOT CLIMATE CHANGE.

Birth Control, not Climate Control.

Meme Mine of NV 4:11PM October 18, 2010

National Science Foundation

NSF

Hydrogen Gas in the Universe

Researcher believes it is key ingredient to Universe.

Chemistry and Clouds

Researchers look at water droplets and chemical reactions.

Learning and Play

Researcher studies children's unstructured playtime.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement