Business School Research Finds Beautiful Women Face Discrimination

Study shows they are often passed over for so-called 'masculine jobs'

August 10, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

DENVER—While many see no downside to being beautiful, a professor at the University of Colorado Denver Business School says attractive women face discrimination when it comes to landing certain kinds of jobs.

 In a study released in the May/June Journal of Social Psychology, Stefanie Johnson, assistant professor of management at UC Denver Business School, found that beauty has an ugly side, at least for women.

Attractive women were discriminated against when applying for jobs considered “masculine” and for which appearance was not seen as important to the job. Such positions included titles like manager of research and development, director of finance, mechanical engineer and construction supervisor.

 “In these professions being attractive was highly detrimental to women,” said Johnson. “In every other kind of job, attractive women were preferred. This wasn’t the case with men which shows that there is still a double standard when it comes to gender.”

 The study, co-authored by Robert Dipboye, professor of psychology at the University of Central Florida, Kenneth Podratz, an organizational development manager at UPS and Ellie Gibbons, research assistant at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, found that attractive men suffered no similar discrimination and were always at an advantage.

According to Johnson, beautiful people still enjoy a significant edge. They tend to get higher salaries, better performance evaluations, higher levels of admission to college, better voter ratings when running for public office and more favorable judgments in trials.

 A recent Newsweek survey of 202 hiring managers and 964 members of the public concluded that looks matter in every aspect of the workplace and they mattered more for women. When asked to rate nine character attributes on a scale of one to 10 with 10 being the most important, looks ranked third, above education and sense of humor, the magazine reported.

 But in one narrow aspect of life, beauty can be a hindrance, something researchers have called the “beauty is beastly” effect.

 “In two studies, we found that attractiveness is beneficial for men and women applying for most jobs, in terms of ratings of employment suitability,” according to the study. “However, attractiveness was more beneficial for women applying for feminine sex-typed jobs than masculine sex-typed jobs.”

 In one experiment, participants were given a list of jobs and photos of applicants and told to sort them according to their suitability for the job. They had a stack of 55 male and 55 female photos.

 In job categories like director of security, hardware salesperson, prison guard and tow truck driver, attractive women were overlooked. In each of these jobs appearance was perceived to be unimportant. Attractive women tended to be sorted into positions like receptionist or secretary.

 “One could argue that, under certain conditions, physical appearance may be a legitimate basis for hiring,” Johnson said. “In jobs involving face-to-face client contact, such as sales, more physically attractive applicants could conceivably perform better than those who are less attractive. However it is important that if physical attractiveness is weighed equally for men and women to avoid discrimination against women.”

The study chided those who let stereotypes influence hiring decisions. Given the importance of hiring and the consequences of making a wrong choice, the authors said, managers need to rely more on information from the individual rather than on stereotypes about physical appearance.

 Located on the University of Colorado Denver’s downtown campus, the Business School is the largest accredited graduate school of business in Colorado with more than 18,000 alumni. It serves more than 1,200 graduate students and 1,400 undergraduate students each year. Students and faculty are involved in solving real-world business problems as they collaborate on more than 100 projects with area businesses every semester through classroom work, guest lectures and research projects.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
discrimination,
working women,
business school,
corporate culture,
women's health

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If you would like to truly evaluate the experiment design, I recommend reading the original paper. Here's a link:

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224540903365414

Rose of KY 11:56AM September 12, 2012

This experiment sounds very poorly designed... the only information people had about applicants was a photo? You're forcing people to think consciously about how looks impact the ability to do the job, and aren't allowing them to consider anything else.

But that's not what you *really* want to measure. You want to measure the sub-conscious effect.

If people had two similarly-good resumes in front of them, which also had photos attached, then you'd get a far more accurate read. But you're forcing someone to make explicit inferences about how good and smart someone is based solely on looks. In that case of course people will fall into the "pretty woman = not so smart" stereotype, because you've given them no other choice. They'll assume that the unattractive woman is more likely to have been working in finance all her life, and the attractive woman is more likely to have spent her career in something else, in-line with people's notions of the typical people who go into these fields. But if you took that away, showed resumes with both of them having similar experience, I'd expect a lot of the effect to fade.

AC of IL 2:18PM August 12, 2010

Yes, thank you, Mr. Allan White of WA, for your wise and insightful comments, posted at 1:00:56 AM. How you could present such a thoughtful and wise argument at such an early hour is beyond me, but thank you for doing so. Because it is important that the world know your opinion. You clearly are the one human being setting the standards of beauty not just on this world, but apparently throughout the universe, including the planet Verig. I can now sleep soundly knowing that the four people reading this article (other than you and I, of course) will now have an unerring sense of true beauty that they can apply when sizing up a member of the female gender. Oh, I'm sorry. Did I pull you away from that porn sight to make you read this? Please, continue your self-gratification. You truly deserve it.

Darrin Joy of CA 1:29PM August 11, 2010

National Science Foundation

NSF

Hydrogen Gas in the Universe

Researcher believes it is key ingredient to Universe.

Chemistry and Clouds

Researchers look at water droplets and chemical reactions.

Learning and Play

Researcher studies children's unstructured playtime.

advertisement

advertisement