Think You're Hot Now? Just Wait a Few Years

July 9, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (10)

By Randolph E. Schmid, Associated Press

WASHINGTON— Folks sweating out the heat wave battering parts of the country may just have to get used to it.

As global warming continues such heat waves will be increasingly common in the future, a Stanford University study concludes.

"In the next 30 years, we could see an increase in heat waves like the one now occurring in the eastern United States or the kind that swept across Europe in 2003 that caused tens of thousands of fatalities," Noah Diffenbaugh, an assistant professor of environmental Earth system science at Stanford, said in a statement.

Diffenbaugh and Moetasim Ashfaq, a former Stanford postdoctoral fellow now at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, used a series of computer models of climate to calculate changes in the future with increased levels of carbon dioxide and other gases in the atmosphere. Their findings are reported in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

They calculate that within 30 years average temperature could be 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, or 2 Celsius, higher than in the mid-1800s.

That level of increase has been reported by others and most atmospheric scientists expect it to lead to warming and a change in a variety of weather and climate conditions.

Diffenbaugh and Ashfaq focus specifically on heat waves over the United States.

They reported that an intense heat wave equal to the longest on record from 1951 to 1999 is likely to occur as many as five times between 2020 and 2029 over areas of the western and central United States.

In addition, they said the 2030s are projected to be even hotter.

"Occurrence of the longest historical heat wave further intensifies in the 2030-2039 period, including greater than five occurrences per decade over much of the western U.S. and greater than three exceedences per decade over much of the eastern U.S.," the researchers reported.

"I did not expect to see anything this large within the next three decades. This was definitely a surprise," Diffenbaugh said.

The research was funded by the Energy Department and the National Science Foundation. The climate model simulations were generated and analyzed at Purdue University.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
heatstroke,
heating,
energy policy and climate change,
United States,
global warming

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

My fear is that the public is being sold a simplistic theory about climate change which goes something like this: 'If we just cut back on carbon emissions, eventually, over time, the climate will return to its natural state of equilibrium'. Sort of like a global thermostat. Not so simple, folks! Although CO2 is a greenhouse gas and altering its concentrations in the atmosphere may cause some change, there are also many other factors that influence climate, such as cloud cover, land forms, various other natural climate cycles, solar radiation, Earth's orbit, etc... Many of these factors are non linear and still poorly understood. It seems as if the human-caused global warming theory has become more of a political movement, as opposed to a purely scientific endeavor. We need to strip this issue of politics and proceed with common sense, acknowledging not only that our emissions may indeed be a problem, but also considering the possibility that our contribution to climate change may not be that significant. Making short-term drastic cuts in carbon emissions may not even yield any measurable results. Don't misunderstand me, I support the expansion of clean energy sources and the so called "no regrets" policy. However, it's entirely possible that we may have to do what humans have done for thousands of years-- simply adapt to changes in the climate.

pmwinters of MA 1:30PM July 18, 2010

Human-caused global warming is undeniable and the vast and expensive campaign by the energy industry has only convinced data and logic challenged people who fear science. The question now remains: when will enough people become worried enough that we take the threat seriously and begin to slowly change our behavior.

AD of CA 5:50PM July 14, 2010

Yes, with climate change, because it is a good cause there no need to prove your speculation.

And no need to point out that this is one of the coldest periods ever in the history of the planet.

takarada 3:42PM July 12, 2010

National Science Foundation

NSF

Hydrogen Gas in the Universe

Researcher believes it is key ingredient to Universe.

Chemistry and Clouds

Researchers look at water droplets and chemical reactions.

Learning and Play

Researcher studies children's unstructured playtime.

advertisement

advertisement