For Most Centenarians, Longevity Is Written in the DNA

Study reveals many genetic paths to 100

July 2, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Tina Hesman Saey, Science News

Juan Ponce de León never found his Fountain of Youth, but researchers may have discovered a genetic equivalent hidden in the DNA of centenarians.

Only one in 6,000 people reaches the century mark and just one in 7 million lives to be a supercentenarian — someone who is 110 or older. But a new study, published online July 1 in Science, suggests that more people may have the right genetic stuff for extreme longevity.

In the new study, researchers looked at genetic markers called single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, in 1,055 centenarians and 1,267 younger people, all of European descent. The scientists found 150 genetic SNP variants linked to extreme longevity.

Initially, the team identified only 33 SNPs found more often in people aged 90 to 114 years but not in a control group made up of people who will presumably live an average lifespan. But, says Thomas Perls, a geriatrician at Boston University School of Medicine who coauthored the new study, the researchers felt that they were still missing part of the story. So biostatistician Paola Sebastiani of the Boston University School of Public Health devised a different statistical method to identify additional SNPs that would improve the team’s ability to predict longevity. The team tested their predictions on a separate group of centenarians and controls. With the 150 SNPs, the researchers could correctly predict who was a centenarian 77 percent of the time.

“Now on one side, 77 percent is a very high accuracy for a genetic model, which means that the traits that we are looking at have a very strong genetic base,” Sebastiani says. On the other hand, the 150 SNPs can’t explain why the remaining 23 percent of centenarians in the study have reached such ripe old ages. It could mean that those people have other, rare genetic variants or lifestyles responsible for their longevity or some combination of the two, she says.

Extrapolating these results to try to predict how long the average person will live would be a mistake, says Nicholas Schork, a statistical geneticist at the Scripps Translational Science Institute and the Scripps Research Institute, both in La Jolla, Calif.

“They’ve identified markers for something, but what that something is remains a mystery,” Schork says. How the combination of genetic markers work together to extend health and life “is the zillion-dollar question.”

Many of the variants have no known function, although some have previously been linked to Alzheimer’s disease, chromosome stability and insulin, Sebastiani says.

Don’t expect the genetic data to lead to a Methuselah pill, Perls says.

“I look at the complexity of this puzzle and feel very strongly that this will not lead to treatments that will get a lot of people to become centenarians,” he says. But the research could conceivably lead to treatments that delay diseases such as Alzheimer’s.

Supercentenarians had nearly all of the longevity markers. But most of the over-100 crowd carried different combinations of SNPs that fell into one or more of 19 different genetic profiles. Those results indicate that there are many different genetic paths to longevity and that many different biological processes are involved, Sebastiani says.

Some of the genetic profiles correlated with extreme delays in the onset of diseases such as dementia, heart disease or cancer. Others seem to allow centenarians to withstand the effects of such diseases. Notably, one group of centenarians had almost none of the longevity-associated SNP variants.

The researchers had expected that centenarians would lack disease-associated variants, but that isn’t the case. On average, centenarians in the study had as many disease-associated variants as people in the control groups did. That suggests that the longevity variants may cancel out disease-associated factors.

About 15 percent of people in the general population may actually have what it takes genetically to reach 100, says Perls. “If they’re not hit by a bus, if they’re not in a war, if they haven’t had some other accident happen, maybe they get to fulfill that,” he says. “Now, a bunch of those people may also need to not smoke and not be obese and a number of important lifestyle factors as well.”

Sebastiani says, “One can conjecture that genetically we’re built to live longer,” and longer life expectancies associated with improved public health measures seem to bear that out.

Other studies have shown that genetics account for only 20 percent to 30 percent of a person’s chances of living beyond age 85. Environmental factors, including lifestyle choices such as diet, smoking and exercise habits, are still the most important determinants of longevity.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
longevity,
genetics

Reader Comments Read all comments (33)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

My Aunt Nettie Crabbs passed away in Macy, In July 10th at age 102-1/2. Her antecedents were Scots/Irish and German, and her Mother lived to be 95. Nettie waqs active well into her late 90's, as was her Mother. Therein lies the secret of longevity: Family, activity, love of life and faith in God.

Bob Fields of MI 12:35AM July 13, 2010

It's in your attitude. My grandma lived to 99 and used to complain about all these "old" (85 to 95) people in the church that slowed her down. My uncle lived to 82 but everyone thought he was 60 physically and mentally. He was always doing new things like buying and setting up laptops with GPS on his boats. Unfortunately he got cancer and in 3 months was gone. But until he was stricken with cancer, he was extremely active with 3 mile walks, hunting, fishing, ranching, boating, and generally "living life". He expected to go another 20 or 30 years at least and blamed the doctors for killing him with a "wait and see" view on his cancer instead of "cut if out".

btw, with that kind of family history, we invest for the long term in dividend paying companies.

Daniel Longview of OH 8:05AM July 05, 2010

The material in this article is fascinating as new breakthroughs in DNA studies reveal propensities toward longevity. Lifestyle choices, e.g. smoking, weight, exercise, obviously play a big part, too. But it seems to me that one factor is conspicuously missing that the medical community has already acknowledged as important: a person's outlook on life.

I am unable to quote chapter and verse in terms of medical studies, but I have read over the years a number of findings that indicate clearly that people who have a more positive outlook on life, including a good sense of humor, do much better in pulling through cancer recoveries, accidents, deep personal losses, etc. Not only 'positive thinkers', but individuals with deeply rooted religious faith have also been shown to endure hardships and pull through difficulties in later life. There is no shortage of documentation of these in faith communities to this effect.

It seems to me that this dimension should also be mentioned as a key factor in longevity. I hope this is a help!

Tim Peters of MD 12:06AM July 05, 2010

National Science Foundation

NSF

Bringing Evolutionary Science to the Community

Center promotes Darwin Day to inspire next generation of scientists.

Constructing Biological Machines

Research has implications for industry, medicine, energy, environment.

Laser Mapping Helps City Planners

LiDAR technology can be used to predict natural disasters.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement