BP Sprays More Chemicals into Main Gulf Oil Leak

May 10, 2010 RSS Feed Print

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO — A remote-controlled submarine shot a chemical dispersant into the maw of a massive undersea oil leak Monday, further evidence that authorities expect the gusher to keep erupting into the Gulf of Mexico for weeks or more.

Crews using the deep-sea robot attempted to thin the oil — which is rushing up from the seabed at a pace of about 210,000 gallons per day — after getting approval from the Environmental Protection Agency, BP spokesman Mark Proegler told The Associated Press.

The agency had halted two previous rounds of the dispersant to test its potential impact on the environment, and approved a third round of spraying that began early Monday, Proegler said. An EPA spokeswoman didn't immediately return messages seeking comment.

BP engineers, casting about after an ice buildup thwarted their plan to siphon off most of the leak using a 100-ton containment box, pushed ahead with other potential short-term solutions, including using a smaller box and injecting the leak with junk to plug it. None of these have been tried so deep — about a mile — however. Workers were simultaneously drilling a relief well, the solution considered most permanent, but that was expected take up to three months.

At least 3.5 million gallons were believed to have leaked since an April 20 drilling rig blast killed 11. If the gusher continues unabated, it would surpass the Exxon Valdez disaster as the nation's worst spill by Father's Day.

The engineers appear to be "trying anything people can think of" to stop the leak, said Ed Overton, a LSU professor of environmental studies.

Back on land, authorities in Louisiana deployed helicopters to drop sandbags the size of elephants along barrier islands and marshes already being lapped at by a sheen of oil. Authorities also planned to use south Louisiana's system of locks and levees to release water to help keep the worst of the oil at sea.

BP — which is responsible for the cleanup — said Monday the spill has cost it $350 million so far for immediate response, containment efforts, commitments to the Gulf Coast states, and settlements and federal costs. The company did not speculate on the final bill, which most analysts expect to run into tens of billions of dollars.

Among plans under consideration for the gusher, BP is looking at cutting the riser pipe, which extends from the well, undersea and using larger piping to bring the gushing oil to a drill ship on the surface, a tactic considered difficult and less desirable because it will increase the flow of oil.

Above the oil leak, waves of dark brown and black sludge crashed into the support ship Joe Griffin. The fumes there were so intense that a crew member and an AP photographer on board had to wear respirators while on deck.

Philip Johnson, a petroleum engineering professor at the University of Alabama, said cutting the riser pipe and slipping a larger pipe over the cut end could conceivably divert the flow of oil to the surface.

"That's a very tempting option," he said. "The risk is when you cut the pipe, the flow is going to increase. ... That's a scary option, but there's still a reasonable chance they could pull this off."

Dime- to golfball-sized balls of tar washed up over the weekend on Dauphin Island, three miles off the Alabama mainland at the mouth of Mobile Bay and much farther east than the thin, rainbow sheens that have arrived sporadically in the Louisiana marshes.

The containment box plan had been designed to divert up to 85 percent of the leaking oil to a tanker at the surface. Icelike hydrates, a slushy mixture of gas and water, clogged the opening in the top of the peaked box like sand in a funnel, only upside-down.

The blowout aboard the rig, which was being leased by BP, was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expanding quickly as it burst through several seals and barriers before exploding, according to interviews with rig workers conducted during BP's internal investigation. Deep sea oil drillers often encounter pockets of methane crystals as they dig into the earth.

Tags:
chemicals,
Associated Press,
oil

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

BP would never go for the plan that crushes the pipeline so that no more oil would gush out; they want to cap it. The fact that the environment is being destroyed is another story.

A proposed solution was to put two low yield nuclear bombs on either side of the problem area, then detonate them simultaneously which would create a compression waves that would meet at the pipeline source of the oil entering the sea.

Robert L. Matarainen of NY 11:00PM May 31, 2010

I dont understand why BP didn't have a real plan in case a disaster like this happened.

The company is only concorned with ascertaining revenue.

Planet earth was given to us by God, and we are doing a horrible job maintaining it. I have a feeling we will suffer on a grand scale because of this.

Revenue won't matter if we poisin our ocean--our water, and sealife.

kathy of CA 8:48PM May 15, 2010

I am so worried over this disaster! I can't believe that BP did not already have a plan in case something like this happened. I can't believe they are stuck on how they are going to stop this catstophe from becoming Death to our Water World. This oil is running under the water and it cannot be stopped, and they are grabbing up in the air for straws, this is truly a sign of the times. We have been trying hard to get everybody on the Save The World Bandwagon, and something like this happens. I really hope all these activist are getting ready to bring to light what all this has affected, don't let them get away with just covering it up, make them truly stare at their MISTAKE. Until then Pray for a miracle from above. Now is the time to put your faith to the test we need help!

Shalonndramarie of CA 11:18PM May 11, 2010

National Science Foundation

NSF

Science of Spatial Learning

Center seeks to transform teaching practices.

Studying Carbon in Rivers

Researcher explores physical, chemical and biological interactions.

Challenge: Quantum Computers

CAREER awardee focuses on what they can and cannot do.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement