Disappearing Ducks?

February 3, 2010 RSS Feed Print

The loss of wetlands in the prairie pothole region of central North America due to a warmer and drier climate will negatively affect millions of waterfowl that depend on the region for food, shelter and raising young, according to research published today in the journal BioScience.

The new research shows that the region appears to be much more sensitive to climate warming and drying than previously thought.

"The impact to the millions of wetlands that attract countless ducks to these breeding grounds in spring makes it difficult to imagine how to maintain today's level of waterfowl populations in altered climate conditions," said Dr. Glenn Guntenspergen, a U.S. Geological Survey researcher and one of the report authors. "Parents may not have time to raise their young to where they can fly because of wetlands drying up too quickly in the warming climate of the future," he added.

A new wetland model developed by the authors to understand the impacts of climate change on wetlands in the prairie pothole region projected major reductions in water volume, shortening of the time water remains in wetlands and changes to wetland vegetation dynamics in this 800,000-square kilometer region in the United States (North and South Dakota, Montana, Minnesota and Iowa) and Canada.

Many wetland species -- such as waterfowl and amphibians -- require a minimum time in water to complete their life cycles. For example, most dabbling ducks -- such as mallards and teal-- require at least 80 to 110 days of surface water for their young to grow to where they can fly and for breeding adults to complete molting, the time when birds are flightless while growing new feathers. In addition, an abundance of wetlands are needed because breeding waterfowl typically isolate themselves from others of the same species.

"Unfortunately, the model simulations show that under forecasted climate-change scenarios for this region (an increase of 4-degrees Celsius), the western prairie potholes will be too dry and the eastern ones will have too few functional wetlands and nesting habitat to support historical levels of waterfowl and other wetland-dependent species," said Dr. W. Carter Johnson, another study author and a researcher at South Dakota State University.

The authors noted that their model allowed a more comprehensive analysis of climate change impacts across the northern prairies because it simultaneously examined the hydrology and vegetation dynamics of the wetland complex, which are both important for the wildlife that depend on the prairie potholes for part or all of their life cycles.

"Our results indicate that the prairie wetlands are highly vulnerable to climate warming, and are less resilient than we previously believed," said Guntenspergen. "All but the very wettest of the historic boom years for waterfowl production in the more arid parts of the prairie pothole region may be bust years in a 4-degrees Celsius warmer climate."

These findings may serve as a foundation for managers and policy makers to develop management plans to prepare for and adapt to climate change in the prairie pothole region.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
science,
animals

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I'm not a fan or member of PETA. I don't like how they portray hunters as the "Great Satan" to every living thing. I am a hunter, and I do hunt ducks. However, if anyone has seen a show called the Duck Commander, you'll understand what I mean by over hunting.

Their goal for one season was to take a bag-limit (the legal amount of ducks a hunter may kill and keep for a day) for each person each day of the season. I know in Kentucky, the bag limit is about four ducks. Let's say the Duck Commander hunts in Kentucky (they actually live and hunt in Louisianna). There is about five of them and seasons last at least two months. So after sixty days of successful hunting, these guys will bag about TWELVE HUNDRED DUCKS!!! I'm sorry, but I sincerely doubt they are eating those birds or mounting them (I don't believe they have the wall or shelf space). If they were to do this on a yearly basis, the duck population will decrease very rapidly. Plus, we are not counting those killed by other hunters.

Perhaps we can decrease the length of the seasons or decrease the bag limit. I am not a tree-hugger. I just like to shoot ducks, eat them, and watch them play when they're out of season.

Patrick of KY 10:57PM February 11, 2010

I'm not sure we can blame global warming for this. I live up north on a 50 acre lake,our water level is pretty far down 2 feet may-be,been here 22 years or more. Two weeks ago I was talking to an oldtimer,he said a lake 15 miles south was so low he could see where trees had been sawn down.he told me he'd been around 65 years and had never seen it before. His conclusion was that some time ago the lake was low enough or not there for logging to take place,then at least 65-75 years of lake and fishing.Seems like a cycle to him and me. What brought on the great dust bowl?

Randy of WI 8:04PM February 11, 2010

National Science Foundation

NSF

Science of Spatial Learning

Center seeks to transform teaching practices.

Studying Carbon in Rivers

Researcher explores physical, chemical and biological interactions.

Challenge: Quantum Computers

CAREER awardee focuses on what they can and cannot do.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement