Environmentalists: Endangered Species Need Action

December 29, 2009 RSS Feed Print

SUSAN MONTOYA BRYAN,
Associated Press Writer

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.—A group of environmentalists pledged Monday to file petitions and lawsuits over the next 36 days to persuade the Obama administration to make protection of endangered plants and animals a priority.

Listings under the Endangered Species Act have reached an all-time low, while the number of plants and animals that need protection is growing, said Nicole Rosmarino, the wildlife program director for WildEarth Guardians.

"It amounts to a lack of will. The Obama administration and Interior Secretary (Ken) Salazar simply don't consider endangered species protection a priority," she said.

Environmentalists accuse the Obama administration of lagging behind previous administrations in listing species under the act. The Bush administration, for example, averaged seven listings per year over its two terms.

By comparison, only three new U.S. species were listed in 2009, while the number of species proposed for protection and those waiting on the candidates' list stands at more than 330.

More than 1,300 U.S. species are currently listed as either threatened or endangered.

The Endangered Species Act, which was signed into law in 1973, has an excellent record in preventing extinction. Ninety-nine percent of the species protected by the act still exist today.

As part of a campaign marking the act's 36th anniversary Monday, WildEarth Guardians filed a lawsuit against the Fish and Wildlife Service seeking protection for the mist forestfly, an insect found only in Montana's Glacier National Park.

Three other actions will follow this week, including lawsuits and petitions on a butterfly found at two spots along the Gulf Coast, a fish that depends on coral reefs in the Pacific Ocean and a rare salamander in New Mexico's Jemez Mountains.

Fish and Wildlife Service spokeswoman Valerie Fellows said Monday that the agency's listing and critical habitat budget had been usurped by lawsuits and court-ordered actions for nearly a decade.

"We essentially lost all of our own discretion to use funding for listing candidates and making petition findings, as we were completely driven by court orders," she said.

Fellows said the agency intends to finalize listings for at least 50 species in the coming year.

The Center for Biological Diversity also launched an effort in December to protect 1,000 of what it considers the most endangered species by getting them on the list during President Barack Obama's first term. The group also is seeking court action on 280 species and has warned it will sue over an additional 144 species, including the plains bison and the California golden trout.

Kieran Suckling, the center's executive director, said Obama has a choice of being a leader in protecting the nation's plants and animals or he can let "the extinction crisis devolve into the political pandering that has characterized his approach on health care and global warming."

If the president doesn't act, Suckling said: "We'll haul him through the court system."

Paul Krausman, a biologist and professor at the University of Montana, said he doesn't think the backlog will ever be eliminated. The danger, he said, is that the listings are being left to the courts rather than biologists.

Despite the backlog, Krausman said other countries envy the United States for the strides it has made in conservation since the act was signed into law.

"The progress has been phenomenal. That's why we have a lot of the species that we have today," he said.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
science,
animals

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Perhaps the reason why the seals disappeared is that, like many animals, they can sense an environmental disaster coming. It may be that the seals detected a massive earthquake coming to the San Francisco Bay Area??? Just a thought.

Robert L. Matarainen of NY 1:50PM December 31, 2009

The “Eco-Elite” have set aside millions of acres in California as frog habitat. You really think that’s enough? I mean we’re talkin’ endangered red legged frogs here - not just some wimpy endangered milk thistle or spotted slime slug. I think something that high on the food chain at least deserves it’s own state.

And that leads me to another environmentally correct dilemma - what if the habitat of the red legged frog conflicts with that of, say the arroyo toad for which they’ve already closed thousands of acres, several campgrounds, streams, roads and trails? I mean you can see the problems; what if the frogs eat the toads food and the toads suffer or vice versa? And I’m sure these frogs and toads share a lot of the same territory as the endangered steelhead, endangered salmon, endangered cutthroat trout (say, are sunfish endangered yet? Well no matter, if not now they soon will be.). And, what about the perennially endangered snail darter and river stickle back? It's certain some of these toads and frogs will, of course, be eaten by the endangered fish. We could remove some of the fish, but that might disturb all the endangered eagles, hawks, condors, owls, buzzards, falcons, osprey - as well as the endangered mountain lions and bears who don’t know the fish are endangered and eat them anyway. What a problem for Environmentalist theology.

I mean life was easier when Environmentalists just had to; take away people's property, prevent farmers from growing food, put up fences and locked gates on “public” lands, close National Parks to private vehicles, stop hunting and fishing, close roads and campgrounds, condemn SUV’s, set fires and sabotage private businesses, exterminate the evil “non-native species” and close millions of acres to preserve them so that future generations can’t use them either. The enviros are becoming very successful at separating man form nature (since he has no place in it), and stopping companies from mining, building power plants or homes, drilling for oil or thinning our forests.

But now, how do we keep all the endangered species from eating each other or encroaching on another species's habitat? It's hard for mere mortals to build a Garden of Eden - Of course without a man and woman, who were the root of the whole problem in the first place.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 10:35PM December 29, 2009

National Science Foundation

NSF

Bringing Evolutionary Science to the Community

Center promotes Darwin Day to inspire next generation of scientists.

Constructing Biological Machines

Research has implications for industry, medicine, energy, environment.

Laser Mapping Helps City Planners

LiDAR technology can be used to predict natural disasters.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement