Global Warming a Tough Sell for the Human Psyche

December 17, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

— Conflicting goals: "Yes, I should be changing my behavior, but I've got to look for a job, I've got to go to the gym, I have to take my kids to soccer practice, so I'll do it tomorrow."

— A sense of inequality: "Why should I take the bus when my boss is driving a Cadillac?"

— Loss of freedom: 'It's a free country. I can drive a Hummer if I want to."

— Tokenism: "I recycle, so thank you very much, I'm finished."

— Excessive optimism: "It will work out in the end. The scientists will figure it out, so I don't have to do anything."

And then there's just plain habit. It's "a huge but boring force," Gifford said. "We just tend to do today what we did yesterday."

So what can advocates do to promote concern and action about global warming?

Gifford cites steps such as convincing people they really can make a difference by taking a bus rather than driving, or by insulating their homes. And messages that focus on taking action to become an "ecological hero" will probably work better than those that portray such actions as a sacrifice, he said.

Swim, who chaired a recent American Psychological Association task force that summarized psychological research relevant to climate change, said appeals stressing the impact of climate change on people and animals may be more effective than those that just talk about seas and temperatures rising. (She is now investigating whether such messages are more likely to make people act).

Elke Weber of the Center for Research on Environmental Decisions at Columbia University said people might respond to projections of what global warming could do to places they care about, like their favorite ski areas or their beach homes.

It's also important for the news media to talk about climate change and what people can do, Swim said. While the Copenhagen talks have gotten plenty of attention recently, in general "there's more in the paper about health care reform than about climate change," she said.

And individuals can talk to their friends about their own concern and actions, Swim said. She sets aside one day a week when she makes a special effort to minimize her own carbon emissions from driving by doing such things as biking or just staying home.

"Most people don't know I have a carbon-free day," Swim said. "I should probably tell more people about that."

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

Tags:
science,
global warming,
environment,
energy policy and climate change

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

NOW A DAYS ITS REALLY TURN INTO A GREAT PROBLEM FOR US.WE NEEDS IMMEDIATELY TO TAKE A STEP TO REMEDY THIS PROBLEM.WE ALL ARE VERY MUCH AFFRAID ABOUT THE FUTURE CONDITION.

SOUMYADIP MONDAL of CA 7:42AM December 19, 2009

There are several "good" reasons people are jumping off the Global Warming/Climate Change crazy train.

1. Scientific myopia. Short term, precise, climate data is a relatively recent field. We're talking less than 30 years.

2. If enough computer models are used it is certain some will show the desired, subjective results.

3. A relatively educated populace understands that there have been periods of warming and cooling in the recent past. Many also know that when co2 levels were 12 times higher than now life on earth flourished profoundly. They also may be aware that sea levels have been rising for thousands of years.

4. It's obvious that politicians, and the scientists they pay, have a dog in this fight. It's made Automaton Al a multimillionaire, a Hollywood hero and nearly a saint.

5. There is nothing but short term circumstantial data indicating anthropogenic

activity as a cause for fluctuating temps.

6. H2O (water vapor) accounts for more than 95% of atmospheric "green house gas. Anthropogenic CO2 is a fraction of 1% and even cutting back an impossible 50% would have no effect on temps.

7. Temps. sea level and ice variations to date are all within historical norms.

In the time it took to read this nearly one hundred people died because Rachel Carson's hysteria caused the banning of DDT. I see many similarities between dogmatic environmentalism and climate science. Together they appear to have morphed into neo-Pantheism - our new State Religion.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 12:57PM December 18, 2009

Lest our grandchildren become soft, let them inherit the challenges of debt and CO2. Best thing we can do for them.

Linda Re of KY 12:21PM December 18, 2009

National Science Foundation

NSF

Hydrogen Gas in the Universe

Researcher believes it is key ingredient to Universe.

Chemistry and Clouds

Researchers look at water droplets and chemical reactions.

Learning and Play

Researcher studies children's unstructured playtime.

advertisement

advertisement