What Killed Ice-Age Animals? Lakes and Trees Provide Surprising Clues

December 2, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Researchers seeking to find out what happened to the ecosystem with the extinction of ancient large plant-eating animals may have raised intriguing new questions about what killed the animals off in the first place.

A series of profound changes to the surrounding landscape likely occurred as a result of the dying of such creatures as mammoths and mastodons, which began their decline in North America about 15,000 years ago at the end of the last ice age, according to a team of researchers at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. The extinction of these herbivores apparently prompted a proliferation of broadleaved trees and, ultimately, the accumulation of woody debris that contributed to a dramatic increase in wildfires.

The researchers also determined that the decline of these animals apparently was gradual, meaning it was not likely they died from some sudden event.

Taken together, the evidence appears to rule out several popular theories about what caused their mass extinction, including the impact of a meteor or comet, a ``blitzkrieg'' of human hunting, or a loss of habitat due to climate changes.

The researchers stressed, however, that they were not trying to find out how the animals died, only what happened as a result of their death.

"The lesson of the research is that species extinctions have ecological consequences," said John W. Williams, professor of geography at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, an expert on ancient climates and ecosystems, and the study's senior author.

"To us, the most interesting thing is that we have a whole set of large herbivores – in all, 34 genera (groups) – that all go extinct," he added. "What are the consequences of losing all these animals in a short amount of time? We showed major changes to the landscape in terms of composition and function of plant communities that our data say is linked to the extinction of these animals."

The researchers, led by graduate student Jacquelyn Gill, analyzed fossil pollen, charcoal and dung fungus spores in ancient sediment beneath Appleman Lake in Indiana, a deep body of water left behind when the last ice age ended about 20,000 years ago.  They also included data obtained previously from sites in New York by co-author Guy S. Robinson of Fordham University.

To get an idea of the population density of the animals, the scientists examined levels of the fungus Sporormiella, commonly found in the dung of large-plant eaters. They also measured pollen embedded in the layers of sediment to get a picture of plant growth and density, and charcoal to determine when fires occurred. 

"The lakes become really good archives of changes in the local environment," Gill said. "They are nice little bowl-shaped lakes that are good records of ecological change. All of these things settle into the lake every year – and slowly, over time, the mud builds."

The researchers delved into roughly 40 feet of sediment and – based on the amounts of fungal spores in the layers of material – determined that the decline of the animals was a gradual process that took about 1,000 years. Radiocarbon dating helped determine age.  The decline in the huge numbers of ice age animals is preserved in the fossil record when the fungal spores disappeared. "About 13.8 thousand years ago, the number of spores drops dramatically," Gill said. "They're barely in the record anymore."

Through studying pollen deposits, they found that broadleaved trees such as oaks, black ash, elm and ironwood began to flourish after the animals declined and could no longer eat them, keeping them in check. Once the animals began to die, the broadleaved trees began to colonize a landscape earlier dominated by needle-leaved trees such as spruce and larch. The resulting mix formed a plant community unlike any seen today, the researchers said.

"We see broadleaved trees in low abundance when these mammals are present in high abundances, and broadleaved trees in high abundance when the dung fungus declines," Williams said. 

Tags:
extinction,
science,
plants,
animals

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What are they teaching in TX schools, Jeff?

robert Hill of CA 1:53AM December 14, 2009

To answer a reader question regarding whether an axis shift of the earth could have occurred, the answer is that it is extremely well researched, and there is only a gradual shift in the axis of the earth, which correlates with major ice ages. They also consider the distance from the sun, which shifts as the orbit of the earth goes from almost circular to more ovoid and back again over very long periods of time.

As for the gravity of the earth, it does not fluctuate and is clearly fixed. If it did fluctuate, one would need to assume that the Sun's gravity fluctuates and since we are still a water-bearing planet in a stable orbit, that is clearly not happening. Mass generates a specific amount of gravitational force, and the mass of the earth is essentially fixed.

That said, size IS important... some extinction events (the Permian mass extinction) were apparently caused by the rapid decline in the oxygen level of the atmosphere, suffocating all animals but those with large lungs who were already adapted to lower levels of oxygen at high altitudes. So the general idea that large isn't necessarily good for survival is a sensible line of inquiry.

And of course, there is the clear global warming phenomenon--maybe it was just getting too hot too fast for them and they didn't adapt to the climate and the influx of new competitors as well as new predators.

Joe Burney of NJ 10:07PM December 12, 2009

I don't see the discontinuity others are claiming exists. The headline says "clues", and the article supports that well. It is straightforward--the decline was not caused by human intervention, a meteor strike, a spate of forest fires, or a change of habitat (as far as can so far be determined). The decline was gradual over 1000 years. The increase in fires and broadleaved vegetation follow the population decline. Those are profoundly different pieces of information than what has been claimed previously, and are indeed clues to why the die-off occurred.

Joe Burney of NJ 9:53PM December 12, 2009

National Science Foundation

NSF

Bringing Evolutionary Science to the Community

Center promotes Darwin Day to inspire next generation of scientists.

Constructing Biological Machines

Research has implications for industry, medicine, energy, environment.

Laser Mapping Helps City Planners

LiDAR technology can be used to predict natural disasters.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement