Malaria Shows Signs of Resisting Primary Drug Used to Fight It

Posted: November 21, 2009

By Nathan Seppa, Science News

WASHINGTON—Malaria that is resistant to the best available drug is more widespread in Southeast Asia than previously reported, new research shows. The worrisome finding poses a risk that travelers could carry this strain of the malaria parasite to other parts of the globe and unwittingly spread it, scientists reported November 19 at a meeting of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

The frontline drug in question is called artemisinin, the most potent medication currently in use against malaria. Signs of malarial resistance to artemisinin have surfaced over the past several years in Cambodia (SN: 11/22/08, p. 9). The new findings confirm that resistant malaria has now cropped up beyond a spot on the border of Thailand and Cambodia where it was initially detected. Now it has appeared in Vietnam and in two spots along the Burma border with Thailand and China.

“Things are changing. There’s no doubt the signs are concerning,” said Robert Newman, director of the Global Malaria Programme at the World Health Organization in Geneva. But he added that these signals are early and need further verification.

Patients in these areas take longer on average to overcome a malaria infection when given a standard combination of artemisinin and another antimalarial. This lag results from slower clearance of the malaria parasites from the blood, said WHO’s Pascal Ringwald, a medical officer who presented the update.

Patients who remain ill for longer stretches despite treatment need extra medication to recover from malaria and are also more likely to have severe or fatal cases, Ringwald said.

Malaria is caused by a single-celled parasite that infects the blood. Symptoms include fever, headache, chills, anemia and a swollen spleen. Of the more than 350 million people who come down with malaria worldwide each year, up to 1 million die. Mosquitoes spread the parasite from person to person.

Malaria has a history of becoming resistant to drugs, and artemisinin now risks becoming the most recent addition to that list. The new reports are disheartening to doctors because artemisinin normally packs a considerable wallop. Although artemisinin is a short-acting drug that gets cleared from the body in a few hours, it makes the most of its time — driving down parasite levels dramatically.

Using artemisinin alone invites resistance. So the standard therapy teams it with one of the longer-acting drugs, which perform mop-up duty on the remaining parasites, said Christopher King, a physician and epidemiologist at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland.

The new flashes of resistance may have arisen because combination treatment isn’t always available. And since artemisinin can be bought over the counter in many parts of Asia, people seeking relief don’t always follow the WHO guidelines of pairing artemisinin with another drug, King said.

Also, taking artemisinin for a fever that isn’t caused by malaria can allow resistant strains of the parasite to take hold, Newman said.

In the past, malaria’s resistance to other drugs has been linked to specific genetic changes in the parasite. The precise mechanism underlying resistance to artemisinin is still unsolved, King said.

Artemisinin is derived from extracts of the sweet wormwood bush. The bush’s leaves have been used as a folk remedy against fevers for roughly 2,000 years in Asia but fell out of use in the 20th century with the introduction of modern antimalarial drugs such as chloroquine.

During the Vietnam War, North Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh appealed to China for traditional remedies for soldiers who had malaria. Tea made from sweet wormwood leaves worked and ultimately became the basis for artemisinin drugs. It’s not clear whether parasites in Southeast Asia are the first to become resistant because they have had a long history with artemisinin, or if other factors are involved, Newman said.

---

 Follow U.S. News Science on Twitter.

RE: The real tragedy

Since the U.S. ban on malaria, there have been extremely few malarial deaths in the United States. According to the CDC, from 1992 to 1998 thirty eight out of the forty malarial deaths have come from travelers bringing it back with them, or induced cases of malaria, the other two are unknown. DDT is known to have negative effects on developing fetuses, and can be readily absorbed into our blood stream upon contact. (See the published peer reviewed article "Outcome of In-vitro Fertilization Treatment and DDT Levels in Serum and Follicular Fluid," a study conducted in Saudi Arabia. There are numerous others that are well researched and well documented). Another danger is the accumulation of DDT in our liver, and in plants and animals, especially aquatic ones.

The comment on Rachael Carson's book is irresponsible and offensive, she even wrote that in certain cases DDT could be used, but used responsibly. It is a fallacy (reductivity fallacy) to state that her concerns, as well as the concerns of those who cited her book as inspiration killed anyone, and is disrespectful to anyone affected by those dictators. The aim of those people were to stop the irresponsible use of the pesticide for the good of man, animal and environment. I think anyone would agree that it is irresponsible to release large amounts of a chemical that we do not know much about. The soil half life alone of the compound is anywhere from 22-30 years, it was and has never been proven safe, but has on the contrary been proven harmful, over and over again. The research and findings are published in many research articles, books and papers. No one has to take anyone else's word for it, the evidence is there.

In other countries where DDT is agriculturally banned, WHO and other organizations can still use it to kill the mosquito responsible for transmitting the disease. One reason many countries have strict bans on DDT is not because of some political hysteria, but because it was found that mismanaged use of the pesticide selected for resistance among the mosquito. Overuse of the chemical selected for those mosquitoes whose genetic material allowed them to tolerate the chemical, and pass on that material to the subsequent generations.

There are many alternatives to DDT, and still many good uses of the compound. It has worked wonders in fighting malaria, and legally continues to do so. The information is there, and we must not let misinformation rule our thoughts.

Daniel Jeffcoach of CA @ Dec 02, 2009 05:44:42 AM

The Real Tragedy....

is the ban on DDT.

I’d like to make the observation that DDT and other pesticides have saved hundreds of millions of lives around the world and that, since the U.S. has banned DDT, and other nations have severely restricted it’s use, millions of people, half of them children, die every year due to malaria and other insect born disease. In addition, the loss of crops to insect pests, results in the slow starvation of hundreds of thousands more. DDT was used by nearly every U.S. serviceman in WWII and sprayed over entire cities in Asia and Europe in order to prevent outbreaks of typhus and plague. There was never a reported case of human sickness or death and millions of lives were saved by it’s use.

Paul Muller won the 1948 Noble Prize in Medicine for his research proving DDT was a safe, yet potent pesticide, and it’s WWII use saved millions of lives. It would not be exaggeration to suggest that no other discovery in history has saved more lives than DDT. Yet, enviros worry about the “possible” never proven, effects of residual amounts of DDT on bird eggs, apparently never concerning themselves with a yearly human death toll in the millions resulting from it’s ban or restriction.

I also wonder if any members of the Eco-Elite have considered that, if we had exercised the political will to spray DDT heavily in the first New York state counties that were initially infected by West Nile Virus 10 years ago, we may have been able to eradicate the disease and prevent the deaths of thousands of people and millions of birds that have since died, as well as the countless deaths to come.

A case could be made that Rachael Carson's, "Silent Spring" , and the subsequent political hysteria banning DDT caused more deaths than Mao, Stalin or HItler.

Distortions, misrepresentations, facile thinking and junk science are, more often than not, the hallmark of dogmatic, intolerant environmentalism. The human race has moved from exploitation of the environment to veneration. We must now struggle to regain the middle ground before we are dragged backward to the dark ages.

R.L. Schaefer of CA @ Nov 23, 2009 17:00:17 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Bugs Inspire Creation of Running Robots

Scientists hope to develop robots that can traverse tough terrains in dangerous situations.

Naked Mole Rats Provide Insights Into Oxygen Use

The mole rat is the only coldblooded mammal, and can survive long periods of oxygen deprivation.

Communicating Using Brain Waves and a Computer

New technology could allow the speech disabled to communicate with the outside world.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!