Oceans Struggle to Absorb More Carbon Dioxide

Posted: November 19, 2009

The oceans play a key role in regulating climate, absorbing more than a quarter of the carbon dioxide that humans put into the air. Now, the first year-by-year accounting of this mechanism during the industrial era suggests the oceans are struggling to keep up with rising emissions—a finding with potentially wide implications for future climate. The study appears in this week's issue of the journal Nature, and is expanded upon in a separate website.

The researchers estimate that the oceans last year took up a record 2.3 billion tons of CO2 produced from burning of fossil fuels. But with overall emissions growing rapidly, the proportion of fossil-fuel emissions absorbed by the oceans since 2000 may have declined by as much as 10%.

Some climate models have already predicted such a slowdown in the oceans' ability to soak up excess carbon from the atmosphere, but this is the first time scientists have actually measured it. Models attribute the change to depletion of ozone in the stratosphere and global warming-induced shifts in winds and ocean circulation. But the new study suggests the slowdown is due to natural chemical and physical limits on the oceans' ability to absorb carbon—an idea that is now the subject of widespread research by other scientists.

"The more carbon dioxide you put in, the more acidic the ocean becomes, reducing its ability to hold CO2" said the study's lead author, Samar Khatiwala, an oceanographer at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. "Because of this chemical effect, over time, the ocean is expected to become a less efficient sink of manmade carbon. The surprise is that we may already be seeing evidence for this, perhaps compounded by the ocean's slow circulation in the face of accelerating emissions."

The study reconstructs the accumulation of industrial carbon in the oceans year by year, from 1765 to 2008. Khatiwala and his colleagues found that uptake rose sharply in the 1950s, as the oceans tried to keep pace with the growth of carbon dioxide emissions worldwide. Emissions continued to grow, and by 2000, reached such a pitch that the oceans have since absorbed a declining overall percentage, even though they absorb more each year in absolute tonnage. Today, the oceans hold about 150 billion tons of industrial carbon, the researchers estimate—a third more than in the mid-1990s.

For decades, scientists have tried to estimate the amount of manmade carbon absorbed by the ocean by teasing out the small amount of industrial carbon—less than 1 percent—from the enormous background levels of natural carbon. Because of the difficulties of this approach, only one attempt has been made to come up with a global estimate of how much industrial carbon the oceans held—for a single year, 1994.

Khatiwala and his colleagues came up with another method.  Using some of the same data as their predecessors—seawater temperatures, salinity, manmade chlorofluorocarbons  and other measures—they developed a mathematical technique to work backward from the measurements to infer the concentration of industrial carbon in surface waters, and its transport to deep water through ocean circulation. This allowed them to reconstruct the uptake and distribution of industrial carbon in the oceans over time.

Their estimate of industrial carbon in the oceans in 1994—114 billion tons—nearly matched the earlier 118 billion-ton estimate, made by Chris Sabine, a marine chemist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Organization in a 2004 paper in the journal Science.

Indisputable!

Now now, our president told the world that there is indisputable evidence that man is responsible for global warming. Of course the fact that native american recordings recall ice sheets as far south as Vancouver within the last four hundred years or that see levels were historically much higher to start with (visit almost any island and look at the island rock, its often coral). Hmm...what would retain heat longer water or land...so if there was more land exposed wouldn't it be hotter.

Intersting how its always the same solution to any "environmental" problem. Us humans must change, consume less, be taxed more, fund more and bigger government. The article does hit on one interesting point you never hear about, plants are likely to be growing faster so instead of taxing emisions why is there never discussion of reaserching bio-mass filters to consume carbon or other scrubber technology. BECAUSE THE ENVIRONMENT ISN'T WHAT ITS REALLY ABOUT STUPID...

John of CO @ Dec 02, 2009 00:27:26 AM

CO2 and plants

As a teenager, 40 years ago I ran an experiment that showed plants growing faster in higher concentrations of CO2. This is not surprising. The major problems of global warming come from man's land use and animal herds, not from CO2. Perhaps 10% of the total warming comes from CO2. The very expensive solutions that are being proposed will not touch 90% of the problem.

Hayne Crum of AL @ Nov 24, 2009 13:06:17 PM

One more thing!

A single volcano blows a hole into the man-made theory when you consider that one eruption like Pinatubo puts out more total CO2 than all of the combined industrial revolution to date!!!

Funny thing is that the ocean has been absorbing that CO2 since the dawn of time.

The character Red Foreman from TV's That 70's Show says it best.

DUMB ASS!

Jeff of WI @ Nov 24, 2009 07:23:00 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Bugs Inspire Creation of Running Robots

Scientists hope to develop robots that can traverse tough terrains in dangerous situations.

Naked Mole Rats Provide Insights Into Oxygen Use

The mole rat is the only coldblooded mammal, and can survive long periods of oxygen deprivation.

Communicating Using Brain Waves and a Computer

New technology could allow the speech disabled to communicate with the outside world.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!