Surface Permafrost Likely to Vanish in Alaska

Posted: November 6, 2009

JEFF RICHARDSON,
Associated Press Writer

FAIRBANKS, Alaska—Alaska probably will see most of its surface permafrost vanish by the end of this century, but researchers believe vast areas of frozen soil will remain deeper underground even as air temperatures increase.

The future of Alaska's permafrost is being closely watched by scientists because of the implications it may have on the climate as a whole. Vladimir Romanovsky, a professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, discussed evolving permafrost research this week during a teleconference through the Alaska Center of Climate Assessment and Policy.

Using models that predict a 4 to 6 degree rise in Alaska air temperatures by 2100, Romanovsky projects slowly vanishing areas of permafrost in the state. Dozens of bore holes are being monitored throughout Alaska to see how permafrost reacts to changing temperatures.

The research has both short-term and long-term significance. Unstable thawing permafrost can cause enormous damage to buildings and other infrastructure, and it releases gases that are widely believed to contribute to global warming.

"It could be a significant player in the carbon cycle in the atmosphere," Romanovsky said.

Virtually all of Alaska is a potential permafrost region, with only Southeast, the Aleutians and Kodiak Island spared from common permafrost patches. The North Slope and Brooks Range are almost entirely blanketed with permafrost, and most of interior Alaska is constantly frozen.

That's expected to change in the next century. Romanovsky and his team of UAF researchers predict a warming trend that will gradually thaw most of the state's surface permafrost. By the end of the century, only the North Slope will remain frozen.

"It doesn't mean permafrost is disappearing," Romanovsky said, because the frozen soil is deeper and more vast than it appears.

Beyond a depth of about 30 feet, he said, the permafrost is generally expected to remain stable, regardless of the temperatures above.

Most of interior Alaska is classified as a discontinuous permafrost region, where 50 to 90 percent of the land is constantly frozen. The patches around Fairbanks range from 31.6 degrees to 28 degrees Fahrenheit and reach a depth of as much as 200 feet.

Near Prudhoe Bay, permafrost has been found at depths of 2,000 feet, Romanovsky said.

The surface warming is important, however, because most vegetation is located in the top 10 feet of permafrost. As it thaws, it releases a pair of greenhouse gases — methane and carbon dioxide.

With data going back as far as 50 years or more, researchers have seen mixed thawing patterns since the state emerged from a cold snap in the 1960s and 1970s.

Alaska saw a dramatic increase in permafrost thawing in the 1990s, but the trend has slowed in the past decade, particularly in inland areas.

In the Interior, the picture is muddled. Many permafrost sites have been largely unchanged this decade. A few permafrost areas have even seen cooling trends in the past three years.

Romanovsky said the explanation is probably a thin early winter snow cover in recent years. Without a thick layer of insulating snow, soil has a chance to freeze even harder in tussock-laden terrain.

"Some years the snow isn't deep enough to cover these tussocks," Romanovsky said. "You see a cooling effect."

Because of factors such as snow cover, predicting the rate of permafrost thawing can be imprecise. Romanovsky's projections also don't take into account the creation of new lakes and wetlands as surface permafrost thaws. Romanovsky said they could potentially cause more thawing at deeper levels.

"That could actually accelerate the destruction of permafrost," he said.

___

Information from: Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, http://www.newsminer.com

I LOVE THESE GUYS....

"Using models that predict that predict a 4-6 degree rise in Alaska's air temperature by 2100..." Ah....what models might those be? Made by Mattel perhaps?

I am further confused by the worry over melting permafrost. If indeed it does melt doesn't that mean more vegetation on the surface? Isn't that good for air quality? Apparently not.

Reputations, grants and political power are now built on the shifting foundation of "Climate Change" (Imagine the climate changing - who could have guessed?) - The enviros can't let this go - ever. The past 5 years of global cooling is dismissed, and the dogmatic, anti-civilization zealots masquerading as scientists press madly on.

R.L. Schaefer of CA @ Nov 09, 2009 13:36:07 PM

It is the submarine permafrost you need to worry about melting

Even more Siberian permafrost is under the ocean, for instance an area six times the size of Germany containing about 540 billion tons of carbon. That submarine permafrost is perilously close to thawing. Three to 12 kilometers from the coast the sea sediment is just below freezing. The permafrost has grown porous, there is a loss of rigor in the frozen sea floor, and the surrounding seawater is highly oversaturated with solute methane.

"...Researchers were investigating "alarming" reports in the last few days of the release of methane from long frozen Arctic waters, possibly from the warming of the sea…" --"Arctic sea ice drops to 2nd lowest level on record," AP, 27 Aug '08

"If the Siberian (submarine) permafrost-seal thaws completely and all the stored gas escapes, the methane content of the planet's atmosphere would increase twelve fold. The result would be catastrophic global warming." --"A Storehouse of Greenhouse Gases Is Opening in Siberia," Spiegel, 17 April '08

By the way, people misunderstand the potency of methane. While over it's lifetime as both CH4 and CO2, it is 23 times more powerful than CO2, it is 70 times more powerful over the first twenty years (and 100 times more power than CO2 over the first ten years). In other words, it will kick start runaway global warming.

Brad Arnold of MN @ Nov 09, 2009 01:10:06 AM

vanishing permafrost

I love these scientists and their dreary so-called predictions. If, if, if! Could, could, could! If my aunt had a beard, she could be my uncle. If we can't trust the ability of weathermen to predict next weeks weather, how can we trust these clowns. They like to predict 2100 conditions because none of us will be here (including them) to kick their butt if their wrong. They're like media slime, they know good news doesn't

sell newspapers nor does it attract the public's attention for their "scientific" pronouncements. A pox on them all!

james Craig, USMC ret. of NY @ Nov 08, 2009 18:03:01 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Wolves, Moose and Soil Nutrients: The Unexpected Connection

Researchers were startled to discover "hot spots" of forest fertility.

Predicting Who Will Survive Skin Cancer

Using new techniques, researchers may now be able to predict the survivability of skin cancer.

Record Highs Far Outpace Lows Across U.S.

Daily record high temperatures occurred twice as often as record lows over the past decade.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!