What's Behind Latest Phobia Towards Vaccines?

November 4, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Nathan Seppa, Science News

PHILADELPHIA - For the folks who promote vaccination, these are trying times. Recently, CNN hosted a segment titled: “Virus or Vaccine: Which is Worse?”

It’s enough to set Paul Offit to ranting, which he did this week at a meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Offit, a physician who heads the infectious disease division at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, has devoted a career to fighting illness. In his job, vaccines are often the most reliable weapon available, and cost-effective to boot. And although it’s astonishingly more dangerous to contract a disease than it is to get vaccinated for it, that message seems to have gotten lost somewhere along the way.

Offit traces this detour back to 1982, when DPT — the shot that prevents diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis – was (wrongly) linked to brain damage. “Three people believed their kids were harmed by the vaccine,” he says.

Offit has compassion for families who have a child who has suffered, whatever the cause may be, known or unknown. But since 1982, it’s been one accusation after another against vaccines. People tried to link the HIB vaccine to diabetes (no evidence), the hepatitis B vaccine to multiple sclerosis (all but one study found no link), and other vaccines to SIDS or autism. Recently, the HPV vaccine — which prevents cervical cancer – got linked to heart attacks and strokes (no proof).

And now the seasonal flu vaccine and H1N1 flu vaccine are being skipped by millions of people who somehow distrust the science that went into making them, even though the illnesses they cause can be fatal.

But hey, it’s a free country. Paul Offit just throws up his hands: “Is it your right to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection? The answer is ‘yes,’” he says.

Mary Ann Jackson, a physician who heads the infectious disease section at Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics in Kansas City, Mo., investigates vaccination rates among specific groups. She says that the new generation of people dodging vaccines includes many white, college-educated women, often young mothers who get their information from the Internet. The odd part, Jackson says, is that these same women are also health-conscious, seat-belt-buckling folks. “They are trying to choose what’s best for their children. They want it to be their own decision,” she says.

Unfortunately, avoiding vaccination has consequences beyond one household. It turns people into pathogen carriers and provides viruses with convenient hiding places. “Herd immunity is eroding to the point that we’re now seeing outbreaks of preventable diseases,” says Offit. In 2004, for example, the United States experienced its worst outbreak of whooping cough (pertussis) in years. Mumps has also cropped up. Daycares have become high-risk areas because they’ve got a population of children who are relatively under-vaccinated, he says. “Doctors are worried about their waiting rooms being dangerous places.”

William Schaffner, a physician who chairs the Department of Preventive Medicine at Vanderbilt University, cited a recent round of focus groups held to discuss vaccines. Some people voiced doubts about vaccine safety. But Schaffner was impressed by one group of participants who were adamantly in favor of vaccination: immigrants from developing countries. “They knew about these diseases,” he says.

Meanwhile, infectious disease experts have little use for “natural exposure” adherents, which include parents who have been known to host chickenpox parties or who otherwise intentionally expose their children to a disease rather than get the kids vaccinated. Chickenpox is far from harmless. While most cases in young children are indeed benign, older children and adults can get terrible illnesses. And getting chickenpox as a child puts a person at risk of getting shingles when older, whereas there is no evidence that a chickenpox vaccination does.

It’s easy to see why these scientists get frustrated. But sometimes not even a barrage of facts helps their cause. Ronald Reagan famously said, “Facts are stupid things.” Maybe so, maybe no.

Tags:
medicine,
vaccines,
science

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Who exactly is doing this research that he talks about. IT'S THE SAME PEOPLE WHO ARE MANUFACTURING THE VACCINES!!!

I am sorry, but i don't trust what is in the vaccines and now my children are dealing with too many problems that they shouldn't be dealing with.

Why have the number of vaccines tripled since 1982??? Wat's wrong with the few vaccines that I got as a child, I'm fine??

My children and I do NOT get the flu vaccine and they are two of the healthiest kids in their school, all the other kids have gotten the flu and coincidentally enough they all did get the flu shot???? Interesting!!!!!

Do your own research, and don't just believe what the drug companies and governemnt wants you to believe, they are the ones that are making all the money and our children are paying the price for it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sylvia of MA 9:02AM February 22, 2010

People in the United States are subject to more "Marketing" then anywhere else on Earth or time in history. We have built up a necessary and inherent distrust and aversion to slick marketing messages. The public health sector has fallen into the marketing trap with the statements from Dr. Offit demonstrate. What we observe is not a fallacious mistrust of vaccines, but a well-earned and rational distrust of the public officials promoting them.

A phrase used repeatedly in this article is "safety profile when compared to the risks run by exposure" Our well-trained skeptical evaluation of this is that the vaccine is only safe when put in relation to the flu. To me this look a lot like a box of junk food with a big label "0g Transfat!" Far to many people then make the decision that they see the parallel to just avoiding junk food and do not get vaccinated.

There is also the though in the back of too many minds that health authorities would willingly lie to people "For the greater good." As a hypothetical only, consider a prophylactic treatment that did indeed cause long term disability in some very small percentage of those to whom it was administered but still met the criteria of a better "safety profile when compared to the risks run by exposure." Health officials and government officials, along with Big Pharma have built a reputation that makes it far to easy to believe they would do everything in their power to obscure and minimize that risk.

What we need in order to reverse the trend in avoiding treatment is a long term commitment the full and spin-free truth from the public health sector. Instead of attempting to obscure or minimize known risk factors and uncertainties with the marketing ploy known as "public health education," the government need to prove its self, as a matter of unbending policy, to be the most honest, complete and reliable source of information even when that information might be seen discourage use.

Bottom line its not the vaccine that is distrusted, but the information marketed by people like Dr. Offit who we would not trust to inform us even if he knew there was a risk.

John F. Miller of CA 1:32PM November 11, 2009

The best tools we have against disease are vaccinations. Why is there so much distrust? First, there are more vaccinations, some of which are mandated. This are viewed as inherently coercive and has lead to distrust. Secondly, the internet provides a resource sharing of information and misinformation regarding vaccinations. These rumors and falsified articles greatly outweigh the scientific literature and can be spread globally in minutes. Lastly, bad news gets more attention than good news. Even if there is more positive messages out there, people will focus on the negative (even if unscientifically proven).

No vaccine has zero risk. However, the risk of having complications with obtaining the virus overwhelmingly outweighs the risk of vaccination complications.

The worst part about the distrust in the vaccinations is keeping pregnant women (who are 4 times more likely to be hospitalized than the general population) from getting the vaccination (The Lancet, 2009). Bill Maher is one of the many that spread rumors about the vaccinations. http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/bill-maher-vs-the-flu-vaccine/?apage=34

Please look at the current scientifically proven research before you spread unproven 'facts'.

Jennifer Smock of IN 10:40AM November 11, 2009

National Science Foundation

NSF

New Uses for Layered Polymer Films

Uses include energy storage, lighter computers, “fish-eye” lenses, and more.

Bringing Evolutionary Science to the Community

Center promotes Darwin Day to inspire next generation of scientists.

Constructing Biological Machines

Research has implications for industry, medicine, energy, environment.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement