HIV Self-Test Proves Accurate

November 2, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

By Nathan Seppa, Science News

PHILADELPHIA — Using basic written instructions and a standard testing kit, people can self-administer an HIV test with a degree of accuracy equal to what health-care workers achieve, according to a new study presented October 31 at a meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Researchers at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore offered people in the emergency room of an urban hospital the option of testing themselves for HIV while they were waiting. The 402 people who agreed to do a test were given a self-explanatory test kit that required either a pin-prick or a mouth swab. The participant then put a blood or saliva sample into a tube, and in 20 minutes the kit rendered a verdict of positive or negative for HIV.

Separately, hospital officials replicated the test on each person. The self-tests matched the hospital workers’ tests in 400 of the 402 cases, says Johns Hopkins clinical microbiologist Charlotte Gaydos. Overall, only two of the people tested positive for HIV, and in both of those two cases the self-test results matched the hospital results.

The kits, which detect antibodies against HIV, were the same ones health-care workers use in conducting routine HIV testing. Participants had no problems telling a positive result from a negative one, Gaydos says.

Past studies suggest that 2 to 13 percent of patients who seek medical care at emergency rooms are HIV-positive, making these venues excellent places to offer testing, Gaydos says. She was encouraged that more than 90 percent of people offered the test agreed to try it.

Early detection is paramount in the fight against HIV, says Michael Saag, an infectious disease physician at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. HIV is marked by a loss of immune cells called CD4 T cells, and catching the infection early allows doctors to intercede before an extreme drop occurs.

Normal CD4 cell counts range from 400 to 1,200 cells per cubic millimeter of blood. People with counts of less than 200 cells/mm(3) at the time they are first diagnosed with HIV have a 25 percent likelihood of dying within 10 years, whereas those with a count higher than 200 cells/mm(3) at first diagnosis have a 5 percent mortality risk over that time, Saag says.

“Early testing enables people to live a relatively normal life span,” Saag says. But getting a positive test on one’s own does raise potential risks. “It could be quite devastating for someone to get a positive test and not know what to do,” he says. Also, one domestic partner might coerce the other to undergo a test, he says.

“On the flip side, we’re dealing with a global pandemic [of HIV]. We need to take the gloves off and try to do everything we can,” Saag says.

Gaydos says that with further study, self-testing for HIV could get regulatory approval and become routine, just as pregnancy testing has become.

Tags:
science,
AIDS/ HIV

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I want to get you input regarding the effectiveness of oral testing for HIV. Recently I went to a nearby medical center to get tested and learned that I had tested positive for the anti-virus. However, I want to know what are the chances of it being "false positive" if one had rinse their mouth with salt water prior to testing?

Lately I've been rinsing my mouth with salt because I've been trying to get rid of this cyst the has mysteriously grown on the palate of my mouth. I've had it for approx 3 months now and it still persists. I've been wanting to carterize it myself...but...to smart to act otherwise.

Thinking it had to do with some gum disease I decided to visit a dentist and they confirmed that it was most likely due to a vascular problem which has yet to be diagnosed.

One week later I decided to go the the local medical center and perform the oral HIV test and to my unfortunate break...i tested positive.

However, I'm not too convinced that it was accurate having rinsed my mouth with a high content of salt water to keep gums from bleeding due to bad case of gum disease which is now under treatment.

What are your thoughts....

I'm looking to get retested in the morning and hope the results were indeed false.

Sincerely yours,

LCMunoz of CA 9:30PM November 12, 2009

Given that only two out of 402 were positive (0.5%), the statistic that claims up to 13% of patients are positive, seems rather grossly exaggerated. One would have to test many more patients before making conclusions applicable to the general public.

IF this test is proven reliable and accurate, one must also address issues around education. HIV testing mandates education about the test. This education prepares the patient both intellectually and emotionally for results. Testing in the absence of such support might lead to some disastrous consequences.

However, I hope this test proves reliable, and is affordable.

Dr.Friesen from Canada 11:46AM November 09, 2009

Given that only two out of 402 were positive (0.5%), the statistic that claims up to 13% of patients are positive, seems rather grossly exagger

of 11:46AM November 09, 2009

National Science Foundation

NSF

Hydrogen Gas in the Universe

Researcher believes it is key ingredient to Universe.

Chemistry and Clouds

Researchers look at water droplets and chemical reactions.

Learning and Play

Researcher studies children's unstructured playtime.

advertisement

advertisement