Eliminate water wastage on Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers, and the entire Aral Sea will be back!
Just look at a Satellite picture of Uzbekistan and northern extremes of Turkmenistan, and note what you see: Two huge lakes in the middle of the desert, soaking up and evaporating uselessly the waters of the two mighty rivers: the bloodline of the Aral Sea.
Just west of Tashkent, is a giant spillage of water from the Farhad Dam on Syr Darya. The spillage has created a lake in the middle of the burning desert in Uzbekistan, the size of Lake Ontario. This is the water of Syr Darya river that is supposed to flow down into the Aral Sea, but is wasted here just because NO ONE in Uzbekistan cares to plug the spillage from behind the Farhad Dam! It would cost less than a few million dollars to build an earthen dam and plug it. By itself, this would increase the flow of the Syr Darya into the Aral by 600%
Then is the diversion of the Amu Darya river, just north of Khiva, into the desert in Turkmenistan, where it creates a huge lake the size of Lake Eire (used to be know as the Sari Kamish depression, and now a deep lake). Plug the spillage here, and you would allow the Amu Darya to deliver at least 15 cubic kilometers of water to the southern Aral Sea.
But, again, Uzbekistan is not a place where environment is worth a penny. The chances of building a simple earthen dam to prevent the Amu Darya spillage, is next to zero.
Even a few hundred people with a dozen or so bulldozers could achieve both of these plugging--that is, if the Government of Uzbekistan would allow it. Being run by the communist dictator, Islam Karimov, any such attempt would land the do-gooders in the Uzbek jails where they would rot.
So goes the sorry story of the Aral Sea....
Clarence Spencerof NY1:03AM April 05, 2010
record trends http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us reviews http://pubs.usgs.gov stratospheric http://www.colorado.gov
lanorabaylof DC6:40PM November 17, 2009
Islam Karimov (the Uzbek preisdent) is a communist. What does he care about anything other than his control of everything{/one} Uzbek?
B. W. from Americaof CO6:05PM November 03, 2009
Congratulations, to Kazakhtan. You finally did it ! The Save our Lakes program is
working. We did the same thing in Mexico with Lake Chapala which was the largest
lake in Latin America and with the help of Save our Lake program, got the politicians
off their asses and saved Lake Chapala which is now just about back to it's original
glory after having lost 86% of its volume. ..... Yes you can!
Ricardo
Ricardo Contreras5:25PM October 27, 2009
Yes, at least the sea is coming back (somewhat) and at least these people have something to eat but I agree that heavy fishing of newly (re)developing fish populations will not help the future situation.
It doesn't take a "hippie" or an environmental engineer to see that, just someone with a little common sense. If you think that "human progress" can only be made by creating ecological disasters and draining natural resources then you are signing your own death sentence.
Emof CA1:19AM October 27, 2009
Pike aren't bottom feeders, they're more like fresh water barracuda. Carp, indeed are.
YahooSeriousof NY1:17AM October 27, 2009
I am from Malaysia.A self made environmentalist I am truly overjoyed with the latest news about Aral Sea.May my brothers and sisters in Kazakhtan could enjoyed back the Aral Sea.
rozlan11:59PM October 26, 2009
Pike and carp -- we always thought of those as "junk fish" -- bottom-feeding fish. Given the levels of pollution -- whoo-boy! I wouldn't want to eat any of them! Probably filled with mercury and other heavy metals...and now, the mental problems (like Asperger's, autism, etc.) that have been linked to heavy metals start...
SFinSFof CA10:37PM October 26, 2009
Western countries need to pressure these guys to fix the Aral Sea. Imagine if this happen to Lake Superior or Lake Erie. They should clean up the seabed floor from salt and metal before the sea comes back so its not contaminated.
Markof AL10:27PM October 26, 2009
Sat photos of the then vs. now would have made a nice complement to this article.
It's good to know that some nations are working to limit environmental damage. We all depend on it too much not to weigh the costs vs. advantages.
Reader Comments
Back to article
Clarence Spencer of NY 1:03AM April 05, 2010
lanorabayl of DC 6:40PM November 17, 2009
B. W. from America of CO 6:05PM November 03, 2009
Ricardo Contreras 5:25PM October 27, 2009
Em of CA 1:19AM October 27, 2009
YahooSerious of NY 1:17AM October 27, 2009
rozlan 11:59PM October 26, 2009
SFinSF of CA 10:37PM October 26, 2009
Mark of AL 10:27PM October 26, 2009
A. Reveue of CA 10:04PM October 26, 2009