Self-Sacrifice Among Strangers Has More to Do with Nurture than Nature

Culture is more important than genes to altruistic behavior in large-scale societies

Posted: October 14, 2009

Socially learned behavior and belief are much better candidates than genetics to explain the self-sacrificing behavior we see among strangers in societies, from soldiers to blood donors to those who contribute to food banks. This is the conclusion of a study by Adrian V. Bell and colleagues from the University of California Davis in the Oct. 12 edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Altruism has long been a subject of interest to evolutionary social scientists. Altruism presents them with a difficult line to argue: Behaviors that help unrelated people while being costly to the individual and creating a risk for genetic descendants could not likely be favored by evolution, at least by common evolutionary arguments.

The researchers used a mathematical equation, called the Price equation, that describes the conditions for altruism to evolve. This equation motivated the researchers to compare the genetic and the cultural differentiation between neighboring social groups. Using previously calculated estimates of genetic differences, they used the World Values Survey (whose questions are likely to be heavily influenced by culture in a large number of countries) as a source of data to compute the cultural differentiation between the same neighboring groups. When compared they found that the role of culture had a much greater scope for explaining our pro-social behavior than genetics.

In applying their results to ancestral populations, the World Values Survey was less useful. But ancient cultural practices, such as exclusion from the marriage market, denial of the fruits of cooperative activities, banishment and execution happen now as they did then. These activities would have exerted strong selection against genes tending toward antisocial behavior, and presumably in favor of genes that predisposed individuals toward being pro-social rather than anti-social. This would result in the gene-culture coevolution of human prosocial propensities.

Bell is currently continuing his research in Tonga, where he is planning through ethnography to estimate statistically what social learning behaviors people have in general that may explain the distribution of cultural beliefs across the Tongan Islands. He is developing a survey instrument that will help capture people's cultural beliefs and measure the effect of migration on the similarities and differences between populations.

View an interview with researcher Adrian Bell of the University of California Davis.

Just to add

Altruism is seen between humans and animals, too, come to think of it. People pour money into their beloved pets, even though domesticated animals are non human.

If there's any research on this, please do report. US News does great science stories, and many would probably love to read more about the human-animal bond, as there seems to be evidence that beloved pets help reduce stress for humans.

Angie Koutrotsios of IL @ Oct 17, 2009 23:40:46 PM

Altruism about as "natural" as selfishness is

"Altruism presents them with a difficult line to argue: Behaviors that help unrelated people while being costly to the individual and creating a risk for genetic descendants could not likely be favored by evolution, at least by common evolutionary arguments."

Evolutionary arguments tend, depending on the researcher, to focus a lot on selfishness and what's best for the individual, but humans have lived in groups throughout history. Hence, the need to cooperate in group settings would surely have been adaptive, thus selected for.

If pure selfishness were more suitable, then clearly, psychopaths would outnumber everyone else in the population. Instead, social checks and balances keep too many out of the population, probably in part by group cooperation wherin members of a group alert others to negative situations experienced with such individuals (thereby reducing the numbers of successful matings among psychopaths).

The genic selectionism debates have long been about nature versus nurture, with both camps often firmly entrenched in their views. But in reality, it is a constant interactive loop between biological beings and their environments.

Angie Koutrotsios of IL @ Oct 17, 2009 23:28:33 PM

Social animal

Folks are both social animals and individuals. Probably much self destructive and altruistic behavior is good for the hive and both genetic and learned.

I wouldn't dismiss the importance of ego. One often observes an enormous amount of self love and ego among people who fall in love with themselves for volunteering and "making a difference."

LindaRe of HI @ Oct 15, 2009 11:34:02 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Wolves, Moose and Soil Nutrients: The Unexpected Connection

Researchers were startled to discover "hot spots" of forest fertility.

Predicting Who Will Survive Skin Cancer

Using new techniques, researchers may now be able to predict the survivability of skin cancer.

Record Highs Far Outpace Lows Across U.S.

Daily record high temperatures occurred twice as often as record lows over the past decade.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!