Earth's 'Boring Billion' Years Blamed on Sulfur-Loving Microbes

A new study suggests microbes could have stalled the evolution of complex life

Posted: September 30, 2009

By Rachel Ehrenberg

Sulfur-loving microbes may have been the party poopers of middle Earth. New research suggests that if such microbes dominated the oceans until half a billion years ago, the organisms could have contributed to the static period known as the “boring billion,” scientists report online September 28 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Various feedback loops involving biota and the nutrients they cycle could have maintained this stasis, creating an environment low in oxygen and unfriendly to multicellular life. 

“If we really want to understand what’s happed in the history of Earth, we really have to understand this cross talk between the physical and biological processes,” says study coauthor Andrew Knoll of Harvard University. 

Scientists have long wondered how the Earth remained in the geochemical and evolutionary stagnation that began about 1.8 billion years ago. The “Great Oxidation Event” had already happened, so atmospheric oxygen was up, at least a little. Eukaryotes—with DNA sequestered in a membrane—had already evolved. But then everything got put on hold for about a billion years: Oxygen levels remained flat, and life remained simple. 

“We don’t have a full understanding of what the full biogeochemical system might have been doing at this time,” comments Mark Claire of the University of Washington in Seattle. “Something was throttling the oxygen levels.”

That something may have been sulfur-oxidizing microbes, which don’t release oxygen into the atmosphere. Knoll, David Johnston and their Harvard colleagues propose. Previous work suggests that the oceans in this era, known as the Proterozoic, were rich in sulfur. So the researchers argue that an abundance of microbes that can use different forms of sulfur affected biogeochemical cycling. These sulfur-using microbes may have set in motion feedback loops that locked Earth in this stasis, the researcher propose. 

Though typical photosynthesizers were still generating oxygen from water in the uppermost layer of the oceans, a toxic layer was forming beneath. There, green and purple bacteria and other microbes used sulfur, washed into oceans by the weathering of the continents, to photosynthesize. Since it is easier to pry electrons from sulfur than from water, sulfur-cycling microbes had an edge, Knoll says. But sulfur-based photosynthesis does not release oxygen, and sulfur recycled and remained in the system.

As the sulfur-based organisms died, their decomposition further robbed the water of oxygen. These processes may have led to a thick dead zone, similar to that seen in today’s Gulf of Mexico. 

Eventually, something shifted—perhaps iron from continental activity entered the oceans, the researcher speculate. Iron binds to forms of sulfur, pulling it out of the system as pyrite. This may have been a blow to sulfur users, allowing photosynthesis by oxygen-generators to increase. And pretty soon, by 600 million years ago, multicellular life arrives at the party. 

“This releases the stranglehold of the system,” Knoll says. “The minute you get rid of sulfide you change how the world works.” 

The model reminds physical scientists to pay attention to the contribution of biota to Earth’s geochemical cycling, Knoll notes. The team now plans to investigate the timing of eukaryotic fossils and the demise of the sulfurous seas as tests for the hypothesis. The project, Knoll says, “gave me new glasses for looking at Earth’s history.”

Wake Up People - To What?

While science is a work in progress, creationism, other than in a loosely based, allegorical/symbolistic interpretation is for the world of those best watching Saturday morning cartoons. So, what school of thought should be people be "waking up to?"

J. Gleick of IL @ Oct 01, 2009 13:35:47 PM

It's interesting people still believe this fairy tale

Populations of tiny fish evolving, over generations, into giraffes, rhinos, birds and human beings? More bizarre than any science fiction ever written. As you read the above article, notice how it's nothing more than one made up belief after another on what supposedly happened BILLIONS of years ago passed off as fact. And many mindless people will just read it assuming it's all fact because the writers say so. To give you an example of how easy it is, here's a paragraph completely made up of lies, and you can't tell the difference between it and the article above:

"Scientists have long wondered how the Earth remained in the geochemical and evolutionary stagnation that began about 20.2 - 21.5 billion years ago. The “Great Oxidation Loss Event," as it's been called, was just about to happen, so atmospheric oxygen was down, at least a little. Eukaryotes — with DNA sequestered in a membrane that has yet to be identified — had already evolved 2 billion years before this Oxidation Loss event but was about to become extinct for reasons unknown to most scientists. But then everything got put on hold for about 8 billion years: Oxygen levels went dangerously low, creating an atmosphere that would not support more complex life, hence the evolution of life remained relatively flat after this Great Oxidation Loss Event as much of life went extinct during this period, devolving life, as it were, to much simpler forms for quite some time."

Wow - sounds so factual when you throw in a bunch of ridiculous claims and pretend it's fact. Wake up, people.

The Truth of PA @ Oct 01, 2009 04:21:15 AM

U235 decay

They should be happy the higher forms of life were delayed. It allowed uranium 235 to decay more completely to thorium, making the enrichment of uranium that much harder. If intelligent life had arrived a billion years ago, it probably would have blown itself up by now.

James Fox of PA @ Sep 30, 2009 18:19:19 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Wolves, Moose and Soil Nutrients: The Unexpected Connection

Researchers were startled to discover "hot spots" of forest fertility.

Predicting Who Will Survive Skin Cancer

Using new techniques, researchers may now be able to predict the survivability of skin cancer.

Record Highs Far Outpace Lows Across U.S.

Daily record high temperatures occurred twice as often as record lows over the past decade.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!