Nuclear Terror Would Strain Day-After Bomb Sleuths

Reader Comments
Back to article

ever consider a false flag attack using a nuke? a government black opp making war on the citizens. building no. 7 fell on 9/11 for no acceptable reason the government can give, so it stand to reason that in may have been a false flag attract to get the ball rolling on a scientific dictatorship, in other wards a world government. it make sense to me.
people need to reject their conditioning and ask question that governments avoids giving answer to.
the old saying goes "believe nothing you hears on the news and 1/2 of what you see. never believe a politicians they lie and steel, at least the career one's do.

john of IN 2:03AM March 21, 2010

Gridlock has a good point, however, instead of wasting nuclear material that will just cause more long term radiation, we should increase our stock in neutron bombs. Lots and lots of them.
Nice thing about the neutron bomb, kills people but leaves houses and buses and oilfields standing. Then we move what is left of the population about and presto: the new Manifest Destiny.
I would recommend not only the countries who are suspect nuclear capable and supporters of terrorism, but also those who do not support American Supremacy of the world. We invented the blue jeans, coke, internet porn, Jack in the Box tacos at 2AM after a night of heavy drinking, and I am sick and tired of the Kim Jong guy with his designer glasses and nude quartets in his personal train. Sick of it I tell you.
That would leave the Aussies and Kiwis, Canucks and Brits, and maybe some of Europe. That is fine. Oh, regarding Venezuala, we should only threaten them and then publicy humililiate Chavez, sentancing him to a life long situation comedy type reality show with Blagojavich. There are a bunch of hotties in that country as well.

JDubya of AZ 11:59AM June 16, 2009

We should just tell every terrorism-supporting state that is currently working on nukes, that we will not be too terribly particular, and hold them all responsible in the event of the detonation of a terrorist nuclear device. As soon as the dust settles, it's nukes all around.
You would think that if Ahmadinejad knew that his safety was based on the stability and responsibility of Kim Jung Il, he might think twice about keeping his nuclear weapons program (and vice versa).

Gridlock of NJ 9:10AM June 16, 2009

I have no idea if we would ever know who "did it" after a nuclear detonation on U.S. soil, but I do know that the imperative to retaliate and obtain revenge will be over-whelming...... and we will kill a lot of people who happen to come into our sights. I hope they are the right perps, .........but they might not be. Should the government refuse to respond after a nuclear attack, the response from the citizens will take the form of a revolution. You can't kill 3,000 Americans without a response, and if you kill a half million, the response will be bloody indeed.

Dave H. of VA 8:39AM June 16, 2009