Nuclear Terror Would Strain Day-After Bomb Sleuths

Posted: June 15, 2009

By CHARLES J. HANLEY
AP Special Correspondent

VIENNA (AP)—If the unthinkable happened, would we be left on the day after, as radioactive dust settled, with the unknowable?

If a terrorist nuclear bomb destroyed the heart of a great city, how would we know who did it, with what? Mideast fanatics with a device improvised from stolen uranium? A weapon smuggled in by a rogue regime? A hijacked U.S. bomb?

Where do you strike back? How do you head off another attack?

U.S. President Barack Obama calls nuclear terrorism "the most immediate and extreme threat to global security." It's an unthinkable that's being thought about daily in classified corners of world capitals.

But knowledgeable scientists and the investigators behind a new U.S. government report say the American nuclear establishment needs more specialists and more background data on possible bomb sources to do the detective job that awaits on that day after.

"I don't believe the intelligence community is ready for the challenge," said Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, who worked for years as a U.S. intelligence leader on weapons of mass destruction.

The concerns are evident in the June 1 government report, an unclassified version of a classified assessment by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), and in an earlier study by major U.S. scientific organizations.

They say an aging, shrinking corps of nuclear forensic experts and U.S. analytical facilities would be badly stretched if a city-leveling nuclear weapon or a "dirty bomb" spreading radioactivity was detonated in the United States.

The scientists also said international databases cataloging characteristics of nuclear materials worldwide, essential for tracing clues in such an event, are currently "not nearly extensive or usable enough."

"If you have the reference data, you can identify the origin. It's just like a fingerprint database," explained Richard Hoskins, a security expert at the International Atomic Energy Agency, in an interview at the IAEA's Vienna headquarters.

Hoskins keeps a global watch on nuclear smuggling. His IAEA database counts 1,646 incidents of trafficking, theft or loss of nuclear materials since 1995, including 18 involving plutonium or highly enriched uranium, nuclear bomb fuels.

No case involved enough material to build a bomb, and Hoskins said his agency detects no strong evidence of a terrorist network, rather than opportunistic thieves, behind any incident. But they don't know what they don't know, he stressed.

"We know that the size of the problem" — both successful and failed attempts — "is probably substantially larger than the number we have," he said.

And at least one terror group is known to aspire to nuclear status, noted another Vienna-based authority, Roger Howsley, head of the World Institute for Nuclear Security, a newly formed, U.S.-supported body to advise on safeguarding nuclear facilities.

"Al Qaida has said it would if it could," he said.

Terrorists face daunting challenges in trying to steal a usable bomb, or build an effective model if they obtain bomb material, experts say.

But "even the minute chance that terrorists might have that ability changes the equation dramatically," Mowatt-Larssen, an ex-CIA official and former U.S. Energy Department intelligence chief, said at a recent "Post-Nuclear Event" discussion at Washington's Georgetown University.

To prevent equation-altering breakthroughs, nuclear forensics is deployed "pre-detonation," to try to trace material seized from traffickers back to the source, to plug leaks at vulnerable nuclear facilities.

With sophisticated equipment and training, chemists and physicists at U.S. national laboratories and elsewhere can learn much from analyzing a few grams of fissile material. For example:

—The ratio of isotopes in natural uranium — of U-238, U-235 and U-234 — varies from place to place and can tip investigators to where a sample of uranium was mined.

—Plutonium's isotopes vary according to the reactor that made it. Bomb-makers Russia, North Korea, Pakistan and Israel, for example, all have different kinds of plutonium-producing reactors.

—The grain size and shape of bomb material can pinpoint a manufacturing process.

Not The New MAD, Just a Smarter MAD

Gridlock has a good point, however, instead of wasting nuclear material that will just cause more long term radiation, we should increase our stock in neutron bombs. Lots and lots of them.

Nice thing about the neutron bomb, kills people but leaves houses and buses and oilfields standing. Then we move what is left of the population about and presto: the new Manifest Destiny.

I would recommend not only the countries who are suspect nuclear capable and supporters of terrorism, but also those who do not support American Supremacy of the world. We invented the blue jeans, coke, internet porn, Jack in the Box tacos at 2AM after a night of heavy drinking, and I am sick and tired of the Kim Jong guy with his designer glasses and nude quartets in his personal train. Sick of it I tell you.

That would leave the Aussies and Kiwis, Canucks and Brits, and maybe some of Europe. That is fine. Oh, regarding Venezuala, we should only threaten them and then publicy humililiate Chavez, sentancing him to a life long situation comedy type reality show with Blagojavich. There are a bunch of hotties in that country as well.

JDubya of AZ @ Jun 16, 2009 11:59:01 AM

The New MAD

We should just tell every terrorism-supporting state that is currently working on nukes, that we will not be too terribly particular, and hold them all responsible in the event of the detonation of a terrorist nuclear device. As soon as the dust settles, it's nukes all around.

You would think that if Ahmadinejad knew that his safety was based on the stability and responsibility of Kim Jung Il, he might think twice about keeping his nuclear weapons program (and vice versa).

Gridlock of NJ @ Jun 16, 2009 09:10:27 AM

Nuclear Terror Would Strain Day-After Bomb Sleuths

I have no idea if we would ever know who "did it" after a nuclear detonation on U.S. soil, but I do know that the imperative to retaliate and obtain revenge will be over-whelming...... and we will kill a lot of people who happen to come into our sights. I hope they are the right perps, .........but they might not be. Should the government refuse to respond after a nuclear attack, the response from the citizens will take the form of a revolution. You can't kill 3,000 Americans without a response, and if you kill a half million, the response will be bloody indeed.

Dave H. of VA @ Jun 16, 2009 08:39:29 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Wolves, Moose and Soil Nutrients: The Unexpected Connection

Researchers were startled to discover "hot spots" of forest fertility.

Predicting Who Will Survive Skin Cancer

Using new techniques, researchers may now be able to predict the survivability of skin cancer.

Record Highs Far Outpace Lows Across U.S.

Daily record high temperatures occurred twice as often as record lows over the past decade.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!