Nuclear Terror Would Strain Day-After Bomb Sleuths

June 15, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By CHARLES J. HANLEY
AP Special Correspondent

VIENNA (AP)—If the unthinkable happened, would we be left on the day after, as radioactive dust settled, with the unknowable?

If a terrorist nuclear bomb destroyed the heart of a great city, how would we know who did it, with what? Mideast fanatics with a device improvised from stolen uranium? A weapon smuggled in by a rogue regime? A hijacked U.S. bomb?

Where do you strike back? How do you head off another attack?

U.S. President Barack Obama calls nuclear terrorism "the most immediate and extreme threat to global security." It's an unthinkable that's being thought about daily in classified corners of world capitals.

But knowledgeable scientists and the investigators behind a new U.S. government report say the American nuclear establishment needs more specialists and more background data on possible bomb sources to do the detective job that awaits on that day after.

"I don't believe the intelligence community is ready for the challenge," said Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, who worked for years as a U.S. intelligence leader on weapons of mass destruction.

The concerns are evident in the June 1 government report, an unclassified version of a classified assessment by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), and in an earlier study by major U.S. scientific organizations.

They say an aging, shrinking corps of nuclear forensic experts and U.S. analytical facilities would be badly stretched if a city-leveling nuclear weapon or a "dirty bomb" spreading radioactivity was detonated in the United States.

The scientists also said international databases cataloging characteristics of nuclear materials worldwide, essential for tracing clues in such an event, are currently "not nearly extensive or usable enough."

"If you have the reference data, you can identify the origin. It's just like a fingerprint database," explained Richard Hoskins, a security expert at the International Atomic Energy Agency, in an interview at the IAEA's Vienna headquarters.

Hoskins keeps a global watch on nuclear smuggling. His IAEA database counts 1,646 incidents of trafficking, theft or loss of nuclear materials since 1995, including 18 involving plutonium or highly enriched uranium, nuclear bomb fuels.

No case involved enough material to build a bomb, and Hoskins said his agency detects no strong evidence of a terrorist network, rather than opportunistic thieves, behind any incident. But they don't know what they don't know, he stressed.

"We know that the size of the problem" — both successful and failed attempts — "is probably substantially larger than the number we have," he said.

And at least one terror group is known to aspire to nuclear status, noted another Vienna-based authority, Roger Howsley, head of the World Institute for Nuclear Security, a newly formed, U.S.-supported body to advise on safeguarding nuclear facilities.

"Al Qaida has said it would if it could," he said.

Terrorists face daunting challenges in trying to steal a usable bomb, or build an effective model if they obtain bomb material, experts say.

But "even the minute chance that terrorists might have that ability changes the equation dramatically," Mowatt-Larssen, an ex-CIA official and former U.S. Energy Department intelligence chief, said at a recent "Post-Nuclear Event" discussion at Washington's Georgetown University.

To prevent equation-altering breakthroughs, nuclear forensics is deployed "pre-detonation," to try to trace material seized from traffickers back to the source, to plug leaks at vulnerable nuclear facilities.

With sophisticated equipment and training, chemists and physicists at U.S. national laboratories and elsewhere can learn much from analyzing a few grams of fissile material. For example:

—The ratio of isotopes in natural uranium — of U-238, U-235 and U-234 — varies from place to place and can tip investigators to where a sample of uranium was mined.

—Plutonium's isotopes vary according to the reactor that made it. Bomb-makers Russia, North Korea, Pakistan and Israel, for example, all have different kinds of plutonium-producing reactors.

—The grain size and shape of bomb material can pinpoint a manufacturing process.

Tags:
nuclear weapons,
science

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

ever consider a false flag attack using a nuke? a government black opp making war on the citizens. building no. 7 fell on 9/11 for no acceptable reason the government can give, so it stand to reason that in may have been a false flag attract to get the ball rolling on a scientific dictatorship, in other wards a world government. it make sense to me.

people need to reject their conditioning and ask question that governments avoids giving answer to.

the old saying goes "believe nothing you hears on the news and 1/2 of what you see. never believe a politicians they lie and steel, at least the career one's do.

john of IN 2:03AM March 21, 2010

Gridlock has a good point, however, instead of wasting nuclear material that will just cause more long term radiation, we should increase our stock in neutron bombs. Lots and lots of them.

Nice thing about the neutron bomb, kills people but leaves houses and buses and oilfields standing. Then we move what is left of the population about and presto: the new Manifest Destiny.

I would recommend not only the countries who are suspect nuclear capable and supporters of terrorism, but also those who do not support American Supremacy of the world. We invented the blue jeans, coke, internet porn, Jack in the Box tacos at 2AM after a night of heavy drinking, and I am sick and tired of the Kim Jong guy with his designer glasses and nude quartets in his personal train. Sick of it I tell you.

That would leave the Aussies and Kiwis, Canucks and Brits, and maybe some of Europe. That is fine. Oh, regarding Venezuala, we should only threaten them and then publicy humililiate Chavez, sentancing him to a life long situation comedy type reality show with Blagojavich. There are a bunch of hotties in that country as well.

JDubya of AZ 11:59AM June 16, 2009

We should just tell every terrorism-supporting state that is currently working on nukes, that we will not be too terribly particular, and hold them all responsible in the event of the detonation of a terrorist nuclear device. As soon as the dust settles, it's nukes all around.

You would think that if Ahmadinejad knew that his safety was based on the stability and responsibility of Kim Jung Il, he might think twice about keeping his nuclear weapons program (and vice versa).

Gridlock of NJ 9:10AM June 16, 2009

National Science Foundation

NSF

Cybersecurity: Training Students

CyberWatch spans all school levels.

Science of Spatial Learning

Center seeks to transform teaching practices.

Studying Carbon in Rivers

Researcher explores physical, chemical and biological interactions.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement