The Inner Worlds of Conspiracy Believers

Posted: May 26, 2009

By Bruce Bower, Science News

Shortly after terrorist attacks destroyed the World Trade Center and mangled the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, conspiracy theories blossomed about secret and malevolent government plots behind the tragic events. A report scheduled to appear in an upcoming Applied Cognitive Psychology offers a preliminary psychological profile of people who believe in 9/11 conspiracies.

A team led by psychologist Viren Swami of the University of Westminster in London identified several traits associated with subscribing to 9/11 conspiracies, at least among British citizens. These characteristics consist of backing one or more conspiracy theories unrelated to 9/11, frequently talking about 9/11 conspiracy beliefs with likeminded friends and others, taking a cynical stance toward politics, mistrusting authority, endorsing democratic practices, feeling generally suspicious toward others and displaying an inquisitive, imaginative outlook.

“Often, the proof offered as evidence for a conspiracy is not specific to one incident or issue, but is used to justify a general pattern of conspiracy ideas,” Swami says.

His conclusion echoes a 1994 proposal by sociologist Ted Goertzel of Rutgers–Camden in New Jersey. After conducting random telephone interviews of 347 New Jersey residents, Goertzel proposed that each of a person’s convictions about secret plots serves as evidence for other conspiracy beliefs, bypassing any need for confirming evidence.

A belief that the government is covering up its involvement in the 9/11 attacks thus feeds the idea that the government is also hiding evidence of extraterrestrial contacts or that John F. Kennedy was not killed by a lone gunman.

Goertzel says the new study provides an intriguing but partial look at the inner workings of conspiracy thinking. Such convictions critically depend on what he calls “selective skepticism.” Conspiracy believers are highly doubtful about information from the government or other sources they consider suspect. But, without criticism, believers accept any source that supports their preconceived views, he says.

“Arguments advanced by conspiracy theorists tell you more about the believer than about the event,” Goertzel says.

Swami’s finding that 9/11 conspiracy believers frequently spoke with likeminded individuals supports the notion that “conspiracy thinkers constitute a community of believers,” remarks historian Robert Goldberg of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City. Goldberg has studied various conspiracy theories in the United States.

Conspiracy thinkers share an optimistic conviction that they can find “the truth,” spread it to the masses and foster social change, Goldberg asserts.

Over the past 50 years, researchers and observers of social dynamics have traced beliefs in conspiracy theories to feelings of powerlessness, attempts to bolster self-esteem and diminished faith in government. Some conspiracy beliefs — such as the widespread conviction among blacks that the U.S. government concocted HIV/AIDS as a genocidal plot — gain strength from actual events, such as the once-secret Tuskegee experiments in which black men with syphilis were denied treatment.

Swami and his colleagues administered a battery of questionnaires to 257 British adults, including a condensed version of a standard personality test. Participants came from a variety of ethnic, religious and social backgrounds representative of the British population.

Most participants expressed either no support or weak support for 16 conspiracy beliefs about 9/11. These beliefs included: “The World Trade Center towers were brought down by a controlled demolition” and, “Individuals within the U.S. government knew of the impending attacks and purposely failed to act on that knowledge.”

Much as Swami’s team suspected, beliefs in 9/11 conspiracy theories were stronger among individuals whose personalities combined suspicion and antagonism toward others with intellectual curiosity and an active imagination.

A related, unpublished survey of more than 1,000 British adults found that 9/11 conspiracy believers not only often subscribed to a variety of well-known conspiracy theories, but also frequently agreed with an invented conspiracy. Christopher French of Goldsmiths, University of London, and Patrick Leman of Royal Holloway, University of London, both psychologists, asked volunteers about eight common conspiracy theories and one that researchers made up: “The government is using mobile phone technology to track everyone all the time.”

I am psychologically defective

Couldn't have put it better myself, RealPatriot!

The truth is of course that there are a complex mesh of reasons for why people subscribe to any cause, and among those there will always be some that are misplaced. To imply, by omission, that this is a phenomenon limited to dissenters is a dirty trick. I'm not saying that the researchers in question are necessarily guilty of this, because it is hard to research more than one aspect of a phenomenon at a time, but if there have been any studies done of conformism as it relates to non-belief in conspiracies, we don't get to hear about them.

That said, people who want to get at the truth should take note of this study and make sure to evaluate each theory on its own merits. The verifiable fact that the WTC buildings were demolished from the inside does not mean that UA77 did not hit the Pentagon. And the fact that a very powerful and well-connected cabal was responsible for 9/11 does not mean that the Illuminati are real. Character assassination is the number one weapon of those who don't have a leg to stand on. Don't give them any fuel.

Interesting that they used a "made up" conspiracy theory about the government conducting constant surveillance via mobile phones. Echelon anyone? In any case, how would they have phrased that? For instance if someone asked me do I believe that all my emails are being monitored, I would have to say yes, because US law makes this possible and because there would be a motive for doing so, but that simply means that I think it likely that my mails are being automatically scanned for key words and phrases and anything "interesting" flagged for future reference. It does *not* mean that I think there is a room full of people in Arlington Virginia or at GCHQ who are talking about me (or at least probably not). It is so easy for people to take a topic of study and twist it to make it useful to them.

iactuallylikelivinginbelgium @ Oct 11, 2009 23:44:13 PM

PSYCHOLOGY OF THE NON-CONSPIRACY THEORIST

flawed documentary demonstrates people who DONT believe in conspiracy theories are quick to base their opinion on partial evidence (not the conspiracy theorists, as they tried to suggest)

heres a teaser from the program: enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmCsDPSeiQk

wearechangenorwich of VA @ Oct 09, 2009 22:20:54 PM

WRONG again...

http://wearechangenorwich.blogspot.com/2009/05/conspiracy-realists.html

Till you look at the evidence, you have no clue, and no argument.

This article is getting boring, having only seen it about 300 different places this week. Why doesn't someone point out how flawed the generic psychologists take on conspiracy theory? Oh look, I already did.

wearechangenorwich of VA @ Oct 09, 2009 22:15:08 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Wolves, Moose and Soil Nutrients: The Unexpected Connection

Researchers were startled to discover "hot spots" of forest fertility.

Predicting Who Will Survive Skin Cancer

Using new techniques, researchers may now be able to predict the survivability of skin cancer.

Record Highs Far Outpace Lows Across U.S.

Daily record high temperatures occurred twice as often as record lows over the past decade.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!