New Obama Rules Will Transform U.S. Auto Fleet

May 20, 2009 RSS Feed Print

TOM KRISHER
Associated Press Writer

DETROIT—The higher mileage and emissions standards set by the Obama administration on Tuesday, which begin to take effect in 2012 and are to be achieved by 2016, will transform the famously oversized American car and truck fleet.

Some drivers will have to give up hulking Sport Utility Vehicles. Carpenters will still haul materials around in pickup trucks, but they will cost more. Nearly everybody else will drive smaller cars, and more of them will run on electricity.

The new rules would bring new cars and trucks sold in the United States to an average of 35.5 miles per gallon (15 kpl), about 10 mpg (4.2 kpl) more than today's standards. Passenger cars will be required to get 39 mpg (16.5 kpl), light trucks 30 mpg (12.7 kpl).

That means cars and trucks on American roads will have to become smaller, lighter and more efficient.

Eric Fedewa, vice president of global powertrain forecasting for the auto consulting firm CSM Worldwide in Northville, Michigan, said the changes will make pickup trucks so much more expensive that they will be used almost exclusively for work.

And instead of a minivan or SUV, more parents will haul their families in much smaller vehicles with three rows of seats — something more like the Mazda 5 small van, he said. The Mazda 5 gets about 28 mpg (11.9 kpl) on the highway.

"I think what you'll see is a lot more creativity in interior packaging," Fedewa said. "You'll get more rows of seats where you traditionally had cargo space."

The changes will start with smaller cars and trucks, and improvements to the internal combustion engine, Fedewa said. Automakers also already working on new technology, including direct fuel injection and high compression of the air-fuel mixture, that will make cars and trucks more efficient.

Car companies are rewiring vehicles so components such as air conditioners and power steering pumps are powered by electricity rather than by the engine, saving fuel.

And they're developing computer-controlled transmissions with six or more gears, adding efficiency, and rolling out more gas-electric hybrids — among the few cars sold today that meet the 2016 standards.

Of course, developing the technology will cost money — billions of dollars — and automakers will pass that on to their customers.

The Obama administration says the changes mean the average vehicle would cost about $1,300 more, although some private analysts say the increase will be much heftier. The administration says gas savings will make up the difference in about three years.

Automakers have said they need stable, relatively high gasoline prices to create a market for electric vehicles. General Motors fears rolling out its rechargeable Chevrolet Volt next year with gas at $2 per gallon.

American consumers have already shown their car-buying habits can change rapidly depending on gas prices. When fuel cost $4 a gallon last summer, people flocked to smaller cars. Gas is much cheaper now, and sales of hybrids have plummeted.

"The U.S. consumer has consistently chosen performance over fuel economy given the relatively low cost of fuel," David Leiker, senior automotive analyst for Robert W. Baird & Co. in Milwaukee, wrote in a note to investors.

The Volt is designed to run 40 miles (64 kilometers) on battery power when it is fully charged. After that, a small internal combustion engine kicks in to generate electricity and keep the car going. Other automakers are working on similar systems.

But the Volt is expected to sell for $35,000 to $40,000, and buyers may be unwilling to pay that much for a sedan, even if tax credits help ease the burden, unless gas prices soar.

Rechargeable electric vehicles, which under government calculations could get 100 mpg (42.5 kpl) or more, will help automakers meet the standards and offset sales of larger, less-efficient models.

Under Obama's plan, the sale of of electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids could also generate "super credits" that would count as more than one vehicle when an automaker determines its average fuel economy and emissions figures.

Tags:
environment,
cars

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

ipcc ago possible observational caused resulting link stories

linwoodoli of IL 5:44AM September 05, 2009

Americans demanded the cars we have now.

Witness the Hummer or the Gigantic Cadillac or Suburban. Chrysler's lineup is a joke and a big FU to the environment. Pickup trucks are as big as dump trucks were only a few years ago. These same cars will still be on the road for 10 to 15 years. While still getting 10 to 15 mpg.

Americans defend their "right" to drive anything they want and to Hell with everyone else. The low wattage mentality of the Average American is astounding.

The first poster has it right, Turbo Diesels already in use in Europe. But Americans need to demand this technology in order for it to happen.

Americans rarely make good decisions and the technology will not prevent America from sliding into a Second World status. It's tough to buy a $27,000 econo car on $8 an hour.

This is depressing.

DaveH. of NC 8:23PM May 24, 2009

We knew in the 1970's that oil was on borrowed time after the OPEC embargo. US carmakers put their heads in the sand with our government - and built garbage small cars in a lame effort to meet demand. We went along ignoring the inevitable for three decades.

The rest of the world moved forward, and they have created fleets of more efficient, quality, high performance vehicles that caused Detroit to take a nose dive. Americans are buying foreign cars. Urban lifestyles also encouraged smaller vehicles that are easier to park. Fortunately - some Hondas, Toyotas, Mercedes and BMW's are built here, so some of the jobs are still here.

Unfortunately - American industry was too lazy to be a leader in this area, and has thus suffered dearly. I really hope they get off their duffs and show us all how good they really can be.

With my commute and current mpg, I would pay back $1300 in 14 months. Also - we don't have to use only battery technology. There are highly efficient diesel engines that have been in use in Europe for the past 10 years at would increase most mileage by 1/3. Hydrogen power is still in its infancy - but if we focus more on that too, we could get away from oil all together.

Another suggestion that would

---save the government money if they used it,

---reduce our use of foreign oil and

---save us all a lot of grief in traffic is:

************ THE FOUR DAY WORK WEEK - 4-10's.

I worked this way for a software company befoe I moved, and LOVED IT. Just imagine 3 day weekends.....

Times change. We need to as well. There will still be big vehicles in the fleets, so selection will still be there for those with a practical use for them, and even their mileage will be improved.

This is something we all can do - and need to.

Dorfy of SC 1:26PM May 20, 2009

National Science Foundation

NSF

Science of Spatial Learning

Center seeks to transform teaching practices.

Studying Carbon in Rivers

Researcher explores physical, chemical and biological interactions.

Challenge: Quantum Computers

CAREER awardee focuses on what they can and cannot do.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement