Satellites Take on Crime Busting Along the Border

May 18, 2009 RSS Feed Print

PHOENIX—From high above the Earth, the U.S. intelligence community is using satellites to track the activities of drug cartels operating along the U.S.-Mexican border.

Pictures from space are being used along with other intelligence to pinpoint Mexican narcotics operations and anticipate smuggling attempts into the United States, said R. Scott Zikmanis, a deputy director of operations with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

Federal officials say an eye in space adds one more tool in an ever-expanding technological arsenal aimed at defending the border from narcotics traffickers, human smugglers and terrorists.

If a satellite picks up on activities by drug runners, U.S. authorities could then transmit information to agents along the border.

In turn American authorities could notify their Mexican counterparts to a stash-house location or use the intelligence to calculate when and where loads of drugs may be coming across the border, Zikmanis said. "Is it possible? Of course it is," Zikmanis said. "Is it practical? Yes."

During a Phoenix conference on border security last week, Zikmanis said his agency already has supplied some data to the El Paso Intelligence Center, a federal clearinghouse for the investigation of drug cartels.

The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency uses satellite surveillance on foreign soil for the Pentagon, though it also has assisted emergency responders in domestic disasters such as wildfires and Hurricane Katrina.

The use of satellite imagery for border security has been limited because of concerns about a military agency assisting domestic law enforcement, Zikmanis said.

Federal law strictly limits U.S. military operations on American soil unless such operations are authorized by Congress.

Any border-security surveillance will be done over Mexico, not the United States, Zikmanis said.

His agency uses both military and commercial satellites for its work.

Because the military photographs may be classified, he said, the agency is wrestling with legal questions about what can be shared with law enforcement.

Civil rights attorneys question the use of satellite technology in law enforcement.

"We are in the midst of a really dangerous time in terms of technology," said Chris Calabrese, an attorney with the Technology and Legal Project of the American Civil Liberties Union.

"The idea that such a powerful tool might be turned on U.S. citizens is really troubling."

___

Information from: The Arizona Republic

Tags:
satellites,
space,
technology

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Kudos to you for an informed, well reasoned and direct response! All I want is for people on both sides to be honest with their motivations and arguments. I tire of the "duuude, hemp is like a _natural_ fiber, man, why does the man keep it down" and the "legalizing pot would destroy western civilization - think of the children" arguments that typically get trotted out and don't help resolve anything.

I do understand your perspective on legalization. In fact, I personally wouldn't care if cannabis were to be legally regulated. But then I'm also not one of those hysterical right-wing nut jobs that seem to be hell bent on destroying any positive connotations about being "American", of which there are many, to the rest of the world.

And to be fair to your disclosure, I myself have never smoked (anything), often have a caffeinated soda for lunch, and only drink alcohol rarely (am too old to hang out at parties/bars by now). I do take a drug, but it is a prescription stimulant for a medical condition.

Cheers.

joe of AL 5:34PM May 20, 2009

Drug cartels do not smuggle drugs- they use commercial shippers- 18 wheelers, cargo

containers, around the clock. Military and drug opposition are equally matched.

Border guards are paid, and business is business. American military intelligence

is defenseless in financial, commercial, entertainment wars.

unlisted number of CA 1:06AM May 20, 2009

Disclaimer: I use drugs.

I drink caffeine in tea, but avoid caffeinated fizzy drinks. These are designed to be addictive to turn a profit by having very high levels of caffeine and sugars. That said, I do get caffeine withdrawal symptoms if I don't have a cup of tea for 24hrs or so - a headache behind the eyes is the main symptom.

I smoke cannabis, unfortunately with tobacco, as is usual in the UK. I do not smoke cigarettes at all, never have, never will. I do experience cravings for a spliff when I go without, but this is due to the nicotine from the tobacco. Even though my concious mind knows a cigarette would kill the cravings, my subconscious craves a "spliff". I am trying to smoke pure cannabis spliffs more frequently, but this is expensive, due to black market prices, and difficult when friends all smoke cannabis with tobacco.

I occasionally drink alcohol, but not as much as I used to. It is so occasional in fact that I can't remember when the last time was I even had a beer! Probably at new year. Alcohol has always effected my memory quite strongly, so it isn't much fun to drink - I can rarely remember anything other than getting to a pub/bar/club after a night out. Even a couple of beers at a lunchtime will mean I have patchy recollection of what the topic of conversation was, for example. Cannabis is much more enjoyable for me.

I do not do cocaine, and don't fancy the sounds of the effects. I might try ecstasy (MDMA) one day, but the crap it gets cut with is disconcerting.... black market effects again. Tried the tiniest bit of speed (amphetamine, not methamphetamine) when I was really drunk once, but had such a little bit it had no noticeable effect.

Apart from cannabis, I essentially don't do any other illegal drugs, but I do think all drugs should be legalised, regulated, and populations provided with accurate information. Adults should be able to what they like in a free society, as long as it doesn't directly hurt or grossly endanger others. Addiction should be treated like the medical problem it is, not by the criminal "justice" systems.

The advocacy of drug legalisation is not a hard and fast way of telling if people use drugs. Joe, you are so very perceptive that someone advocating drug legalisation does enjoy a smoke, but anyone who has a modicum of intelligence, more than a passing knowledge of history, and actually speaks to people outside their social circle realises that drugs being illegal do no one any favours, except law enforcement and those who benefit from the current status quo (alcohol industry, etc.).

Common sense of 11:20PM May 19, 2009

National Science Foundation

NSF

Bringing Evolutionary Science to the Community

Center promotes Darwin Day to inspire next generation of scientists.

Constructing Biological Machines

Research has implications for industry, medicine, energy, environment.

Laser Mapping Helps City Planners

LiDAR technology can be used to predict natural disasters.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement