Study Sees 'Alarming' Use of Energy, Materials in Newer Manufacturing Processes

Making manhole covers is more efficient than making microchips

Posted: May 4, 2009

The inherent inefficiency of current solar-panel manufacturing methods could reduce the technology's lifecycle energy balance.

The inherent inefficiency of current solar-panel manufacturing methods could reduce the technology's lifecycle energy balance.

According to a recent study, new manufacturing systems are anywhere from 1,000 to 1 million times bigger consumers of energy than more-traditional industries. In short, pound for pound, making microchips uses up considerably more energy than making manhole covers, for example.

Manufacturers have usually been more concerned about factors like price, quality, or cycle time, and not as concerned about how much energy their manufacturing processes use, said Timothy Gutowski, a professor in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s department of mechanical engineering, who led the analysis. If energy prices rise again or if a carbon tax is adopted, energy use will become more important as the new industries scale up, Gutowski said.

New processes will be optimized and improved over time. But over the past several decades as traditional processes such as machining and casting have increasingly given way to newer ones for producing semiconductors, MEMS and nano-materials and devices, energy and materials consumption has increased dramatically.

“New processes are huge users of materials and energy," said Gutowski. “We have increased our energy and materials consumption by three to six orders of magnitude.”
At first glance, it may seem strange to make comparisons between such widely disparate processes as metal casting and chip making. But Gutowski says such a broad comparison of energy efficiency is an essential first step toward optimizing these newer manufacturing methods as they gear up for ever-larger production.

"The seemingly extravagant use of materials and energy resources by many newer manufacturing processes is alarming and needs to be addressed alongside claims of improved sustainability from products manufactured by these means," Gutowski said.

Solar panels are a good example. Their production, which uses some of the same manufacturing processes as microchips but on a large scale, is escalating dramatically. The inherent inefficiency of current solar-panel manufacturing methods could drastically reduce the technology's lifecycle energy balance—that is, the ratio of the energy the panel would produce over its useful lifetime to the energy required to manufacture it.

The study, which is "the first step in doing something about it," Gutowski said covered everything "from soup to nuts" about standard industrial methods. Researchers included heavy-duty old fashioned industries like a cast-iron foundry, all the way up to semiconductors and nanomaterials. It includes injection molding, sputtering, carbon nanofiber production and dry etching, along with more traditional machining, milling, drilling and melting.

The researchers did not analyze production of pharmaceuticals or petroleum, and they looked only at processes where electricity was the primary energy source.  And, they say, the figures the team derived are actually conservative because they did not include some significant energy costs such as the energy required to make the materials themselves or the energy required to maintain the environment of the plant (such as air conditioning and filtration for clean rooms used in semiconductor processing). "All these things would make [the energy costs] worse," he says.

The study, which was funded by National Science Foundation, was recently published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

—By David Chandler/MIT News Office.

Solar Power

The author is correct, the energy used in producing the solar panels could have been used to help the BABY SEALS.

The so called "Renewable Energy Initiative" is nothing more than a Vote Generating Machine.

It is flat out wrong to think Solar Energy, Wind or other "Alternative Energies" can make the smallest dent in our energy requirements. It just isn't currently possible. (You can check) We use too much energy and are not willing to make the sacrifices necessary to build a sustainable society based on wind and solar. It doesn't add up.

Fossil fuels like oil, coal and natural gas, are the Cheapest, Biggest Bang energy sources that currently exist.

(And here it comes!)

Besides Nuclear. But Nuclear Energy is Mysterious and Scary. So most people form opinions on Nuclear Energy based on Popular Opinion and not Science, they oppose Nuclear Energy on an Emotional and not a Rational level.

Nuclear Energy is one of the Cheapest, Safest and sustainable Bang for your Buck energy producers. It' proven, reliable and available now. It doesn't rely on sunny days or wind to work. It never sleeps so it's ready to use 24/7.

This is the current reality, even if you disagree emotionally, (and you will) it's still true.

The Math is just too inflexible to make Solar/Wind/Biomass Power work at this time.

Were that this wasn't so.

But it is.

DaveH. of NC @ May 08, 2009 16:28:10 PM

economics

But these newer technologies are of very high value per unit of mass. A better question is what is the energy input per dollar output of manufacturing over time.

Chris K of DC @ May 06, 2009 11:50:02 AM

Counting all energy used in making solar panel

ALL energy inputs should be counted in making solar panels: mining, personnel transport processing of ores, silicon, glass, bauxite transport and smelting, materials transport, buildings where the PV panels are made, lighting/heating/AC for those buildings, and maintenance of everything over the lifetime of solar panels and infrastructure. In addition, all of the salaries and dividends of all employees involved in all processes must be counted, as salaries and dividends are spent on oil (vacations, food purchases/transport of food, etc.).

Cliff Wirth

http://survivingpeakoil.blogspot.com/2009/03/peak-oil-economic-depression-has.html

http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html

Clifford J. Wirth, Ph.D. @ May 05, 2009 10:07:29 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

How Bacteria Get Past Our Defenses

Researchers study one of the few bacteria that manages to evade the body's mucus defenses.

Key Smell Attracts Mosquitoes to Humans

New research paves the way for important developments in disease control.

Ancient Lemurs Take Bite Out of Evolutionary Tree

Newly discovered primate is not part of the evolutionary lineage leading to monkeys, apes, and humans.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!