Islands: Exquisite Labs of Evolution

By U.S. News Staff

Posted: April 30, 2009

A ring tailed lemur, or lemur catta.

A ring tailed lemur, or lemur catta.

Islands hold a special place in the thoughts of evolutionary biologists like Anne Yoder. They're like floating labs of evolution.

The recipe works like this: put some food, water and shelter in an isolated location where escape and immigration are unlikely. Introduce just a handful of individuals. Cook 60 million years. Decipher results.

"Madagascar, where lemurs evolved, is probably the most productive and exquisite natural evolutionary laboratory on the planet," says Yoder, who is director of the National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded Duke Lemur Center. "And lemurs are the crown jewels of the evolutionary process there."

Lemur family of 70 species

Since arriving on the large island 62 million years ago, probably half-drowned and clinging to a raft of vegetation blown off Africa by a storm, the small primates that became lemurs have been doing their own thing in an isolated paradise where competitors and predators were few and food was plentiful.

From those soggy founders, the lemur family has split into more than 70 species, adapting and spreading into a remarkable variety of sizes, shapes and personal habits. They now occupy every ecological niche a primate would want to occupy.

How Yoder knows all of this, and why she cares so much about it, is a story in itself.

Lemur love at first sight

Her journey, like those of the first lemurs, began by chance. As an average, not terribly motivated undergraduate student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Yoder went with her class one day to the nearby Duke Lemur Center in Durham. It's the world's largest collection of lemur species outside Madagascar, and serves a key role in both conservation and research.

In what can only be described as love at first sight, she quickly tightened her focus on zoology as a major and set her sights on studying these fascinating creatures.

The theory at the time, based on a mere sliver of anatomical evidence, was that lemurs had colonized Madagascar from Africa, and then returned to the mainland later to become lorises and bush babies. "As a graduate student, I thought 'What? That doesn't make much sense.'"

She took it upon herself to set the record straight.

Lemurs, lorises and bush babies

Although it is a very old island, whatever terrestrial fossil record Madagascar might have for the period of time relevant to lemur evolution lies under thick soil and even thicker rainforest. So piecing together this family history required some of the newest and most advanced genomic techniques.

Yoder and her colleagues have used powerful computers and the genes of living primates--including humans--to formulate hypotheses about how these animals all relate to one another, and in what order events happened. Today, the prevailing theory championed by Yoder and others is that lemurs, lorises and bush babies have a common ancestor, but the creatures that made it to Madagascar evolved in isolation and under unique evolutionary pressures relative to the rest of the primate family tree, or phylogeny.

"Anne was one of the first and most energetic adopters of genetic and genomic approaches to sort out the phylogeny of lemurs," said Hunt Willard, director of the Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy at Duke. "She recognized early on that genetics could hold the answer to sorting out the primate family tree, especially for branches of the tree that lacked a solid fossil record."

Protecting lemurs from extinction

It's the lemurs' similarities to us and other primates that are so fascinating, Yoder says. And so are their differences.

Having established her career as a teacher and researcher who has published many landmark works, Yoder has come full circle to become the director of the very same Lemur Center that changed her life.

Her goal, and the center's, is to understand how lemurs got to be the way they are, and to protect them from extinction. "I want to know what happened. I really want to know."

I rest my case continued.

Because of humanity's innate sense of right and wrong that is universally throughout the world and time, evolution can not be correct. Or do atheists expect us to believe dinosaurs had laws and codes of ethics?

A third reason, everyone on earth has the ability to recognize the need for a higher being, including atheists. Atheists need a God to deny for their beliefs to be relevant. When disasters and catastrophes happen, people do not turn to science. They turn to a faith in a divine being because they are not willing to believe there is nothing after death. Everyone on this planet knows that is a dismall fate and is not worth accepting. Life is too beautiful and too precious for that kind of fate. But the life evolutionists offer is too cold to be sympathetic to any kind of life. Only a personal deity can offer that kind of sympathy.

But why the Christian God? The Christian religion is the only one with historical evidence backing it up. The resurrection could have been disproven, but it wasn't because it is true. If Christ was just a good teacher, then His claims to be God were lies and He was not a good teacher. Also, how could a mad man or a liar fool so many people with the miracles that were performed out in the open? Therefore, He must have been Lord to be able to perform miracles, rise from the dead, and forgiving the sins of people that were not committed against Him. And because He is Lord, His words are true. And since they are true, He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life by which we may be saved and come to God face to face.

Dr. Shade of NC @ May 24, 2009 21:57:01 PM

I rest my case.

prof. grip, while desparately trying to defend evolution, proved what I had posted earlier: Yoder's work proves absolutely nothing other than some similarities and differences among the primates in Madagascar and mankind. The "objective" proof he claims Yoder and others have provided, really isn't objective at all since it can also be used to support the Creationist view that God loves variety, no matter how drastic or slight.

Also, note that scientists have yet to test Ms. Yoder's "theories." That is because they have no DNA samples of lemurs a million or even a thousand years ago to prove her assumptions. Since they are unable to proceed with an experiment with DNA, Yoder's and other scientists' "theories" are really just hypotheses (a.k.a. educated guesses). In fact, the theory of evolution is just a hypothesis, based on the observations of Darwin and his followers. They have an interesting idea, yet they can not give credible, "objective" proof that it is more than just an educated guess.

Now, prof grip has asked me to provide proof for humanity coming from Adam and Eve. Of course, prof grip knows darn good and well that there was no such thing as birth certificates during ancient times. As for Eve coming from Adam's rib, doesn't he (I am guessing prof grip is a he) know God did not invite future surgeons into His operating room? Seriously though, prof grip knows I can not provide proof for what he asks and believes he has trapped me. Yet such is not the case. If there is an omnipotent God who created the natural world by the spoken word, it is reasonable to believe He could create the human race with just two people and create a woman from a man's rib. Also, only one woman was created by a man's rib. Not multiple women as prof grip suggests.

Of course my belief is based on a pretty large if. So how can I prove that there is an omnipotent God? First, I point to creation as it is too magnificent and complex to be a result of random chance. If there was any more oxygen in our atmosphere, we would burn up. If we were any closer or farther away from the sun, the earth would be too hot or cold for life. The human eye is so complex that even Darwin admitted it couldn't be explained away by evolution. If one part of a bacteria's flagellum was not in its proper place, it would hinder the life of an evolving organism rather than helping it. Because life on this planet is so complicated and complex by design, there is no possible way for it to have happened without an intelligent being causing it into existence. Second, I point to morality. Evolution offers no reason for there to be a sense of right and wrong. How? Well, if evolution is correct, then humanity will eventually evolve beyond this point of being concerned with right and wrong. Tell any parent who has just learned that his/her daughter has been raped or child was brutally murderd this idea and expect them and others to accept it, you are nuts.

Dr. Shade of NC @ May 24, 2009 21:04:24 PM

Where's the proof?

You have got to be kidding, right? I really don't have time to respond in point to your misguided opinions, but I will say one brief thing about role of genetics.

Genetic testing and calculation is but one way that Yoder can be confident and thus provide "proof" for her theories. Comparative analysis of primate genomes have provided a wealth of information on specific species development and evolutionary geneology. Conversely, the Creationist view is not supported by any objective "proof" at all. Nada, zip, nothing. Instead of discounting Yoder I would like you to respond with one point of objective proof that human beings are a product of the biblical Adam and Eve. And that females were created from the rib of a man. So, for you to believe the Adam and Eve story and in turn question Yoder's theory on lemur evolution is patently ridculous.

prof grip of KS @ May 24, 2009 12:44:20 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Wolves, Moose and Soil Nutrients: The Unexpected Connection

Researchers were startled to discover "hot spots" of forest fertility.

Predicting Who Will Survive Skin Cancer

Using new techniques, researchers may now be able to predict the survivability of skin cancer.

Record Highs Far Outpace Lows Across U.S.

Daily record high temperatures occurred twice as often as record lows over the past decade.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!