Glacier Movement Limits How Fast Sea Level Can Rise

April 28, 2009 RSS Feed Print

The fast motion of glaciers, which can cause large amounts of ice to be dumped off land into the sea, is a wild card in projections of sea level rise, but estimates of its contribution can still be constrained according to a recent study funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF).

Principal investigator Joel Harper, a glaciologist at the University of Montana, says it is more plausible to expect sea level to rise as much as 80 centimeters by the end of this century, rather than several meters, as some scientists have theorized.

"We have estimated limits on sea level rise during the next century by considering simple constraints on glacier and ice sheet motion," Harper said. "Our work suggests that 0.8 meter of sea level rise is a plausible upper limit, while an upper limit of 2 meters is possible only under extreme conditions and more than 2 meters appears unlikely."

Considering all major sources of sea level rise, including water and ice discharged from Greenland, Antarctica, smaller glaciers and ice caps and the thermal expansion of water as ocean basins warm, the researchers' most likely estimate of roughly 3 to 6 feet by 2100 is still potentially devastating to huge tracts of low lying coastal areas.

"A rise in sea level of 0.8 to 2 meters is still a very serious business, especially for the millions of third-world people who live within a meter of sea level," Harper said.

An article about this research appeared in the September 5 issue of Science. Co-authors are Tad Pfeffer, a glaciologist with the University of Colorado at Boulder, and Shad O'Neel, a researcher with Scripps Institute of Oceanography at the University of California at San Diego. A University of Colorado fellowship co-funded the study.

"We don't understand the physics in enough detail to predict a rise in sea level precisely," Pfeffer said."The problem of maximum sea level rise by 2100 is still rather open-ended. Sea level has risen very fast at times in the geologic past, but those events aren't necessarily good predictors of events in the near future. We need to use the tools we've got to get the best answer we can for the conditions that exist today. While we don't claim that a rise in sea level beyond 2 meters in the next century is a physical impossibility, we believe it is extremely unlikely and would not be a good working model for policy makers and community planners."

"As this study indicates, climate change is an incredibly complex process," said NSF program officer Bill Wiseman. "These research results add another significant piece to the puzzle as we try to understand the various drivers of climate change and the potential consequences of those drivers. Although the work by Joel and his colleagues involves many assumptions, such efforts will be necessary to place realistic limits on future sea level conditions until we are able to model glaciers and ice sheets accurately."

Glaciers add water to the sea through surface melt and by "calving" icebergs. Surface melting of ice cannot alone cause multiple meters of sea level rise by 2100. The marine-terminating glaciers would also need to speed up and discharge an increased number of icebergs into the ocean. The researchers estimated what flow conditions would have to exist for Greenland to raise the sea level by large amounts (2 and 5 meters) in the next century and then asked whether those conditions might reasonably occur.
To construct a truly predictive model of sea level rise is not possible at this time, as scientists simply don't understand the physics of glacier dynamics well enough. For one thing, not all the glacier contribution to sea level comes from Greenland and Antarctica. At present, the world's other glaciers and ice caps contribute nearly double the amount of water that Greenland and Antarctica do. The researchers focused on Greenland because of its vulnerability to Arctic warming, the recent accelerations of glaciers there and its large volume reductions during the last interglacial period. Also, the kind of data required to answer their questions are available for Greenland, but not for most of Antarctica or the remaining glaciers and ice caps.

Tags:
global warming,
energy policy and climate change

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Look up how the area of Panama was formed. They formed by earthquakes. Imagine that, land masses appearing where they were not before. Oh my! This is condradictary to the oceans rising, but I bet those clever glaciologist know all about tectonic plate movement and earthquakes. I'm sure the computer models they use take this into account. Everybody agree?

Mad Scientist of AR 7:37PM May 01, 2009

http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/RS_Greenland.htm

nofreewind.com of PA 11:37AM April 30, 2009

There has been global warming since the late 70's, but it doesn't appear to be much different than the 50 year period from about 1900 to 1950. From 1950 to 1980 we had a period of global cooling. Man-made global warming should be considered and scientifically challenged.

Here is a very good place to start. Look at the Greenland data and then click around and look at the other charts, esp the hurricane tab.

It is possible that we are now entering another period of global cooling, just a part of a cycle, and that this CO2 stuff is all NONSCIENCE.

These are very detailed scientific discussions and we have to look at the merits of both sides. I feel the Alarmists lack credibility and that have been proven time and time again. And to think that they somehow think that putting up millions of wind turbines in our world is going to stop CO2 from entering the atmosphere shows a very basic lack of power plants and electricity use. www.nofreewind.com

NoFreeWind of PA 11:36AM April 30, 2009

National Science Foundation

NSF

Science of Spatial Learning

Center seeks to transform teaching practices.

Studying Carbon in Rivers

Researcher explores physical, chemical and biological interactions.

Challenge: Quantum Computers

CAREER awardee focuses on what they can and cannot do.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

advertisement