Will We Soon Find Life in the Heavens?

Discovered: distant 'Earths' and dirty ice on Mars; up next: wiretapping E.T.'s phone

By Brian Vastag

Posted: July 24, 2008

The 42-dish Allen Telescope Array in California will listen for alien broadcasts.

The 42-dish Allen Telescope Array in California will listen for alien broadcasts.

Alien-hunting scientists have had an eventful year, and they're about to get busier. In just the past few months, life-friendly soil and ice turned up on Mars, astronomers bagged a trio of Earth-like planets in a distant star system, and scientists looking closer to home reported that certain hardy microbes thrive below Earth's ocean floor—a big clue that life may exist on planets that at first glance appear inhospitable.

None of the findings shout, "Here be aliens!" but each report has stoked optimism among astrobiologists that they will discover life beyond Earth. Some leading stargazers, in fact, suspect we're now on the verge of learning that we're not alone—and that genesis wasn't a unique event.

In space, "everywhere we look, we see the same processes that we think led to the origin of life on Earth," says John Rummel, NASA's senior scientist for astrobiology.

In the coming months, two new tools will greatly expand astrobiologists' capacity to hear and see other promising signs of life. Later this summer, the nonprofit SETI Institute, named with the acronym for the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, will begin listening for alien broadcasts on the new $50 million Allen Telescope Array. A spread of 42 radio dishes in California's Cascade Mountains, the array is the first such facility built specifically to listen for E.T. "We're looking for life that's clever enough to hold up its side of the conversation," says Seth Shostak, a senior astronomer at the SETI Institute. The array, half funded by Microsoft mogul Paul Allen, will search for alien signals at a clip "hundreds to thousands times faster" than current SETI projects, says Shostak.

Meanwhile, NASA's $550 million Kepler space telescope is being readied to launch next February. Kepler is the first telescope designed to glimpse Earth-like worlds orbiting distant stars. Though astronomers have had trouble detecting them directly, they suspect that such planets are commonplace throughout the galaxy. A recent survey of 200 potential solar systems suggests that perhaps a third of all sunlike stars possess Earth-like planets, says Christophe Lovis of the Geneva Observatory in Switzerland, whose team conducted the analysis.

Since 1995, astronomers have found some 300 planets outside our solar system. But most are giant balls of heated gas that revolve tightly around searing suns. Such "hot Jupiters" lack the solid orliquid real estate—not to mention the climate—needed to sustain life. In June, however, the Geneva team announced finding three presumably rocky "super-Earths" orbiting a star similar to the sun. Unfortunately, those planets, which range from four to nine times the mass of ours, whiz around their star in just four to 20 days. Their fast orbits reflect short distances between the planets and their star, meaning they're too hot to support water-based life.

Transit time. To detect distant planets—the newfound super-Earths are some 42 light-years away—ground-based astronomers infer their presence from the slight wobble each body's gravity gives the closest star. That technique, while good at finding large planets blazingly close to their suns, is not sensitive enough to spot smaller, rocky worlds in the "Goldilocks zone," where the temperature is just right for liquid water.

In contrast, Kepler's 5-foot-wide, unblinking eye can spot Earth-size planets as they pass in front of their stars—a phenomenon known as a transit. When a transit occurs, the brightness of the mother star drops by a few parts per million, just enough for Kepler's 95-megapixel camera to notice. And if Kepler discovers Earth-like planets, says Rummel, then the odds of finding life, perhaps intelligent life, could soar.

Even before the space telescope takes flight, scientists expect to learn more about the habitability of our nearest planetary neighbor. In May, the Phoenix probe touched down near the Martian north pole, the latest in a string of NASA missions to investigate whether the Red Planet ever sustained life. The little lander promptly discovered ice just inches beneath the surface, adding to the evidence that the entire northern plain of the planet is a dust-covered ice sheet. Then, in late June, the probe tested a soil sample and found "the nutrients to support life," reports Samuel Kounaves of Tufts University, who led the soil experiment. The dirt was slightly alkaline, which on Earth is good for growing asparagus and turnips. "There is nothing about it that would preclude life," Kounaves says. "In fact, it seems very friendly."

If some areas of Mars is hospitable for life, why don't we put life there?

We are spending billions to find a microbe and we know there isn't intelligent life on Mars or elsewhere in our solar-system, so why bother just looking for a microbe on Mars? Big Deal! Why don't we seed Mars with compatible life forms from Earth (we can mutate protozoans to survive on Mars). This could be useful to us and would be a great experiment. The microbiologists would love this challange. Bacteria can be force grown to live in the Mars environment. Putting life on Mars would be a great endeavor for mankind; because we are not going to communicate with an intelligent microbial civilization on Mars as in many science fiction movies. I think there is intelligent life on Earth but I'm not sure of this as it difficult to set up communication with the Earth's life forms.

Robert L. Matarainen of NY @ Jul 29, 2009 13:16:59 PM

Is there?

My personal opinion is that their is aliens but not our size, Here on earth millions of years ago we started of as tiny little particals that over time natural selection or evolution as some call it, took place to make bigger and better cretures such as us humans. So if we began like that why can't people believe they have yet. Us humans haven't been on Earth for ever, so maby life on other planets havent evolved yet. I also believe that every planet in our solar system have gone through stages. Earth i feel is in the middle stage and after a while will end up like mars or the sun, all dried out. Scientists are telling us about global warming, its not as if only earth will ever expeiriance this, what if mars did and life their died out. We haven't been here long enough to even suspect what happens on other planets.

Corey @ Jul 15, 2009 07:13:46 AM

aliens

I think we should stop wasting our money on these projects. If the aliens are so sophisticated they will contact us. let them spend all their money, if they have any, and contact us. or perhaps they are a bunch of snobs and they have no interest in us at all. so why bother?

ex-terrestial of NJ @ Apr 19, 2009 21:31:53 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

How Bacteria Get Past Our Defenses

Researchers study one of the few bacteria that manages to evade the body's mucus defenses.

Key Smell Attracts Mosquitoes to Humans

New research paves the way for important developments in disease control.

Ancient Lemurs Take Bite Out of Evolutionary Tree

Newly discovered primate is not part of the evolutionary lineage leading to monkeys, apes, and humans.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!