How Did People Reach the Americas?

Ancient DNA sheds light on the prehistoric humans who colonized a hemisphere

By Andrew Curry

Posted: July 24, 2008

From ancient DNA, Eske Willerslev teases out answers to prehistoric puzzles.

From ancient DNA, Eske Willerslev teases out answers to prehistoric puzzles.

After years of spirited debate over how and when people first reached the Americas, scientists finally seem poised to reach agreement. The emerging consensus: In contrast to what was long held as conventional wisdom, it now seems likely that the first Americans did not wait for ice sheets covering Canada to melt some 13,000 years ago, which would have allowed them to traipse south over solid ground. Instead, early nomads might well have traveled by boat or at least along the coast from Siberia to North America, perhaps navigating arctic waters near today's Bering Strait. The telltale evidence: ancient DNA from those early people that's been coaxed, by powerful analytical technology, into revealing its secret.

Rewriting the prehistory of the Americas is perhaps the most remarkable discovery—but hardly the only one—so far achieved through the analysis of ancient DNA. Other new insights about the past are being drawn from the same emerging scientific discipline. In the past five years, the double helix has shed light, for example, on the vanished woolly mammoth, the flightless dodo, and even humanity's long-lost kin, the Neanderthals. Extracting and testing old DNA, once considered practically impossible because too little of the stuff survives the eons intact, are now at the cutting edge of archaeology, paleontology, and other fields, thanks to new techniques and more powerful technology.

"Archaeologists are used to stone tools and bones," says Ted Goebel of Texas A&M. "So for us to be presented with this kind of evidence is pretty intriguing." DNA, which contains the blueprints for organisms, degrades over time, breaking down into tiny pieces or disintegrating entirely. For years, the dearth of intact DNA in ancient samples—a chunk of mammoth bone, for instance, or a human hair—stymied researchers who were trying to analyze the material. But now, using a technique called polymerase chain reaction, or PCR, researchers can "unzip" minute fragments of surviving DNA and duplicate them millions of times over, until they have a sample large enough to test. Then, by comparing differences between the ancient material and modern samples of known provenance, they can analyze a long-extinct animal's genome.

The resulting data, in some cases, can resolve a long-standing scientific deadlock. For almost a century, most archaeologists believed that people arrived in the Americas between 13,000 and 13,500 years ago. The date was based on flint tools first found in Clovis, N.M., and later all over North America. From that evidence, archaeologists sketched out a scenario in which fur-clad "Clovis" hunters chased mammoths and other prey from Siberia to North America across a land bridge exposed by low sea levels. Then, the theory goes, they hunted along a path from Alaska down through Central America and all the way to Chile in just a few centuries.

Before Clovis. But the notion that Clovis came first has collapsed in the face of recent evidence, including DNA that pushes the arrival of the first humans in the Americas back at least 1,000 years, centuries before the ice that covered northern Canada at the time had melted enough to allow migration. Instead, some argue, the first Americans must have arrived by boat, skirting the coast from Siberia and sailing south along the American coast.

University of Oregon archaeologist Dennis Jenkins discovered the critical new evidence buried more than 4 feet below the floor of a dusty cave near Paisley, Ore. The "artifacts" were 14,300-year-old fossilized pieces of excrement, or coprolites. Jenkins, who has been digging in Oregon's high desert for decades, handed off bits of coprolite to geneticist Eske Willerslev of the University of Copenhagen. In Willerslev's laboratory, PCR pulled enough DNA from the ancient poop to prove it was human and even genetically link it to modern American Indians.

Announced in April in the journal Science, the find backs up evidence previously found at the other end of the Americas, at a site in Chile called Monte Verde. There, a full-fledged campsite was radiocarbon dated to 14,500 years ago, putting people in South America more than a millennium before those Clovis hunters supposedly crossed the Bering Strait. But carbon dating is inexact, and the Monte Verde find had not convinced some skeptics. With DNA analysis, says Jenkins, "we can directly date the item and verify it's human." The Oregon find has largely silenced the last few Clovis adherents. "It's pretty compelling stuff," says Goebel, a longtime Clovis supporter.

who's truth you want? because there is lots of those

you want science theories or God's or native american histories? what do you want?

because this subject is kind of like that Goblieke Tepe, you know science calls it "the garden of eden" and trying to bill it as a temple.. but it is an animal breeding farm at the base of the "mountains of ARARAT"

it is even name " belly with a button " or such .. I mean it has to mean "womb" of the world.. so depending on what or who is looking at something will depend on what they see, because we are all going to see only what we want to see.

so what do you want to see?

I personally wanted to know the TRUTH<<,, they are all different peoples "truth" out there and it is all very political. so who's theories or hate mongering or stereotyping or you guess as to whatever else from money to power or ANYTHING , MOSTLY PRIDE THAT could motive man kinds wet dreams about other people..

I personally decided to go with eye witness to events that have been passed down through history, events never explained by science. as they choose to make up their own stories THINKING THEMSELVES WISER THAN THOSE WHO LIVED THROUGH IT..

thus I went with certain native peoples stories. YOU KNOW the thought out and clear versions in real context translated as best as they could at the time by native americans (USUALLY CHIEFS) around 200 to 300 years ago. I mean why would they have any reason to lie? passed down after many generations from eyewitness. confirmed all over the north and south america and something confirmed by people stories or writings in the old world.

also to confirm them I then followed religions and ancient traditions and customs to show who they once were .. some of you won't have the inside scoop on those , you might have to just trust me because I ain't going to tell you family business you know... but there are huge clues as to where most of the tribes came from and about when they got here ..

again I choose to believe recorded history, oral or written in anything ! over made up fantasies, wet dreams and power plays and money grubbers, yes anyday .

here is some interesting links for those who want to know what I have decided is my ancestors truth anyway. this is what I will tell my grandchildren was that their grand parents tried to tell us. but I will also say how today no one believed them. that is what happens when the real truth because politically incorrect.

lots of links at each site to follow and read.

the links to a few native peoples stories is a must read , there are many more such stories and versions of those events.

http://hbfimmigrants.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=history&thread=575&page=1

hope that helps some of you. sorry you won't understand all of it .. like the cheddar man statement.. sorry long story.

purpleflowers of MO @ Nov 09, 2009 00:17:38 AM

who's truth you want? because there is lots of those

you want science theories or God's or native american histories? what do you want?

because this subject is kind of like that Goblieke Tepe, you know science calls it "the garden of eden" and trying to bill it as a temple.. but it is an animal breeding farm at the base of the "mountains of ARARAT"

it is even name " belly with a button " or such .. I mean it has to mean "womb" of the world.. so depending on what or who is looking at something will depend on what they see, because we are all going to see only what we want to see.

so what do you want to see?

I personally wanted to know the TRUTH<<,, they are all different peoples "truth" out there and it is all very political. so who's theories or hate mongering or stereotyping or you guess as to whatever else from money to power or ANYTHING , MOSTLY PRIDE THAT could motive man kinds wet dreams about other people..

I personally decided to go with eye witness to events that have been passed down through history, events never explained by science. as they choose to make up their own stories THINKING THEMSELVES WISER THAN THOSE WHO LIVED THROUGH IT..

thus I went with certain native peoples stories. YOU KNOW the thought out and clear versions in real context translated as best as they could at the time by native americans (USUALLY CHIEFS) around 200 to 300 years ago. I mean why would they have any reason to lie? passed down after many generations from eyewitness. confirmed all over the north and south america and something confirmed by people stories or writings in the old world.

also to confirm them I then followed religions and ancient traditions and customs to show who they once were .. some of you won't have the inside scoop on those , you might have to just trust me because I ain't going to tell you family business you know... but there are huge clues as to where most of the tribes came from and about when they got here ..

again I choose to believe recorded history, oral or written in anything ! over made up fantasies, wet dreams and power plays and money grubbers, yes anyday .

here is some interesting links for those who want to know what I have decided is my ancestors truth anyway. this is what I will tell my grandchildren was that their grand parents tried to tell us. but I will also say how today no one believed them. that is what happens when the real truth because politically incorrect.

lots of links at each site to follow and read.

the links to a few native peoples stories is a must read , there are many more such stories and versions of those events.

http://hbfimmigrants.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=history&thread=575&page=1

hope that helps some of you. sorry you won't understand all of it .. like the cheddar man statement.. sorry long story.

purpleflowers of MO @ Nov 07, 2009 19:39:49 PM

decrease sulfate tonne stories developer

turn tonne biological believed

corbyncast of CO @ Nov 04, 2009 02:46:30 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Wolves, Moose and Soil Nutrients: The Unexpected Connection

Researchers were startled to discover "hot spots" of forest fertility.

Predicting Who Will Survive Skin Cancer

Using new techniques, researchers may now be able to predict the survivability of skin cancer.

Record Highs Far Outpace Lows Across U.S.

Daily record high temperatures occurred twice as often as record lows over the past decade.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!