How Did Life on Earth Get Started?

Scientists aim to repeat the 'miracle' of genesis

By Brian Vastag

Posted: July 24, 2008

Scientists favoring one or another theory have tried to boost their case by attempting to re-create the elements of life—and even life itself—from the bottom up. Such work sparked to life in 1953, when two researchers cooked up a "primordial soup" of amino acids. In their University of Chicago lab, they applied simulated lightning to a pair of flasks that contained, respectively, an oceanlike solution and an atmosphere rich in methane, water vapor, ammonia, and hydrogen. That experiment and subsequent ones showed that simple chemistry can transform nonorganic molecules into the building blocks of life.

"The classic experiments done over a period of 50 years give us confidence that the building blocks would have been present," says Andrew Knoll, a paleontologist at Harvard University. "The big question is how do you go from there to something that can replicate itself." A pile of lumber, after all, is not a house.

To understand how the transition might have occurred, a handful of scientists are striving to re-enact it in the lab. Jack Szostak of Harvard Medical School is at the forefront of this work. In his lab, researchers fill test tubes with the barest ingredients of life, then watch the elements self-assemble into what look like primitive cells, hoping that they will begin replicating. "Sooner or later, life will be made in the lab," says Joyce, who performs similar experiments.

While none of these primitive cells have yet "gone critical" and started to copy themselves, the research has already paid real-world divi-dends, including one blockbuster pharmaceutical and perhaps more to come. The drug Macugen treats macular degeneration, the leading cause of blindness in the elderly, with a tiny snippet of the genetic molecule RNA. Since scientists like Szostak think RNA preceded DNA, they've invented ways of pushing RNA to evolve in test tubes. Under the right conditions, that process can produce an RNA molecule that's evolutionarily "fit" for a task like treating the biological cause of macular degeneration.

Hazen says that origins-of-life experiments may also help create synthetic cells that can churn out biofuels, which would be a boon in these days of energy crunches and concerns about climate change. "Life takes things like carbon dioxide and water and makes useful compounds, including fuels," he says. "If we understand in a basic way how that's done," he adds, then scientists might be able to build a primitive, fuel-producing protocell.

Such a self-replicating system, Joyce and Szostak contend, would constitute life. And while such a feat may not exactly recapitulate how biology began, it would be example No. 2—the first being the entire panoply of plants, animals, and other organisms that now dominate our planet.

哈哈

还行 挺好的

Eric of AZ @ Sep 18, 2009 11:29:12 AM

Justine

Here's why I believe in a personal, transcendant, creating God. First, the universe began to exist and therefore must have a cause. The second law of thermodynamics can not allow for an infinitely old universe because entropy would set in and energy would no longer be usable. In the end, an infinitely old universe would be a dead universe. Some may say that there is a "god particle" or some form of eternal matter that has always existed and created/makes up the known universe. Again, such matter would go against the second law of thermodynamics and there needs to be strong evidence that such thing does exist. However, most people do not believe that this eternal matter exists, especially atheistic naturalists. Having established that the universe had a beginning, we come to my second point: the universe came from a creator.

We know that something does not come from nothing. So what existed before the universe? Atheists say nothing, but we know this can not be true. Some worldviews say there is a god, but he/she is apart of the universe. Naturally, this god couldn't be the creator because he/she is part of the creation. All we are left with is a transcendent being with the power to defy the law of conservation. This is acceptible because this being does not belong to the physical universe where the laws of nature preside. Creation also supports the idea that there is a creator. Macro-evolution is not observable and has serveral problems. (Where are the "missing-links"? Where did animals gain the different beneficial genetic information to become other species? Irreducible complexity?) Also, the odds for life occuring by chance via natural selection are very low. This doesn't mean it couldn't happen, but the likely-hood that it did happen unaided is improbable.

Third, humanity has this innate sense of justice/ethics. Atheism has no answer or explanation as to why people have this "conscience." This isn't evolution of social species because animals are barbaric. Alligators do at times eat their young. Most other "moral" behavior is just part of an animal's instinct to survive, not doing something because it is just or right. Christianity believes that the Creator, God, has given mankind this sense of right and wrong and He Himself is the basis of morality.

Fourth, the Resurrection has yet to be disproven. Many theories have developed about how it is a fraud, but none hold water.

This is not a complete testimony, but it is a good defense as to why I believe what I believe. I don't believe in God just to make God. I believe in God because the facts have led me to Him.

Dryfire of IL @ Sep 05, 2009 12:51:31 PM

my type of comment

people believe in god for reasons unkown,

example:they never found out why and how the Earth was created and I do not know too, but believing in nothing has created war ,for example terrorist and yes there will also be war if your an athiest or if the world is, but I'm not against religion so you can still believe in god, and maybe just believing in god will god only be created.

there are thousand of goddist that people believe in like:

mother nature, father time, god, the indian goddist, and that might cause war you may think but what really does.........

are the creatures who came to live for a different reason who endangered the animals and decreases the percantege of life, these creatures.......are you

justine @ Aug 31, 2009 07:30:54 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Wolves, Moose and Soil Nutrients: The Unexpected Connection

Researchers were startled to discover "hot spots" of forest fertility.

Predicting Who Will Survive Skin Cancer

Using new techniques, researchers may now be able to predict the survivability of skin cancer.

Record Highs Far Outpace Lows Across U.S.

Daily record high temperatures occurred twice as often as record lows over the past decade.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!