Endangered Destinations

Places, like species, can vanish forever. A look at some unique, imperiled treasures

By Julian Smith

Posted: May 15, 2008

And anyone who finds Nemo (or any clown fish, for that matter) amid the sea anemones of the Great Barrier Reef should give thanks to forward-thinking conservation efforts set in motion decades ago. To minimize the impacts of millions of visitors, an eco-certification program has been set up for local tourism operators, who cooperate with the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority to make sure visitors know that the reef is as fragile as it is dazzling. In 2004, no-fishing zones were expanded to include over a third of the marine park. Studies have shown that these result in larger fish and more of them—one found coral trout numbers increased more than sixfold in "no-take" areas. Even fishermen now support the idea, counting on the spillover of fish to parts of the reef where fishing is permitted. The Queensland state government also put a Reef Water Quality Protection Plan into action to decrease silt and runoff of agricultural chemicals and fertilizer from nearby fields.

The effort in Australia has been hailed as a model for marine conservation. The goals of the plan are "as high as anywhere in the world," says Steve Palumbi, a marine ecologist at Stanford University, and "everything looks quite hopeful" after the most recent steps. With so many stakeholders united, the reef is a great example of conservation through collaboration, says Kelly Bricker of the International Ecotourism Society.

Responsible tourism can be a troubled place's salvation. Bricker's message to conscientious visitors: Educate yourself and tread lightly. Pick travel companies that make conservation a priority, support local conservation programs, and get to know the specific problems that affect your destination and how you can minimizeor eliminate your own contribution. "Without tourism," says Jonathan Tourtellot, director of the National Geographic Society's Center for Sustainable Destinations, "habitats such as Costa Rican rain forests would be grazing land by now and the only elephants left would be in zoos."

That helps explain why a mountain gorilla is worth more per hour than a Manhattan psychiatrist. Poaching, forest clearing, and armed conflict threaten these animals, which share 98 percent of our genes. Fewer than 700 survive on the lush slopes of the Virunga volcanoes in East Africa where Rwanda, Uganda, and Congo meet. Recently, both Rwanda and Uganda more than doubled their gorilla visitation fees to $500 per person, and paying tourists still come from afar for carefully controlled one-hour encounters. Some of the money is directed back into local communities, giving residents an incentive to protect these gentle giants.

But some problems are so large in scope that only a massive, government-sponsored conservation effort has any hope of success. Over the past century, the swamps, marshes, and pinelands of Florida's Everglades have been crisscrossed by canals, poisoned by pesticides, and squeezed by agriculture and urban development. The Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, passed by Congress in 2000, includes new levees, canals, and water-control structures to provide flood control and protect endangered native fish and wildlife in the largest wilderness in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. It's the biggest restoration project in history, with a price tag that has already passed $10 billion. Yet despite these efforts, some predictions hold that a combination of more severe storms and rising sea levels could inundate most of the "River of Grass" with salt water by the end of the century.

Such a long list of challenges can seem overwhelming; witness the recent rise of "last-chance tourism," with a see-it-before-it's-gone mindset that brings visitors to Europe's melting glaciers and polar bear habitat in northern Canada. But an equally long list of solutions, both tried and planned, offers a balance of hope. Even after finishing her book, Lisagor says, she still has faith that these places can be saved, though "it's going to take a major effort." Unless local and global issues are tackled, she says, "we can expect to see a sad, steady procession of the world's great places as they march out of the guidebooks and into the history books."

Global Cooling

Questionable science now prevails the public airwaves and press. Global warming is primarily part of natural cyclical changes - the degree human activities may contribute has not been authoritatively quantified in the context of natural events. When all air traffic was suspended for 3 days over the U.S. airspace after 9/11, the elimination of jet engine contrails and particulates reportedly resulted in a 3 degree F reduction in air temperature due to reflected sunlight at higher altitudes. But then, maybe the temperature just happened to dip for 3 days as it does regularly. What's real? What about superhot volcanic vents that regularly spew super heated water and methane? How much more does that serve to heat up the oceans than driving our vehicles (whose particulates may also serve to cool the air - thus offsetting global warming?). We really don't know enough to declare man is responsible for global warming - or cooling for that matter.

Tony Lee of CA @ Mar 18, 2009 19:36:40 PM

Climate changes with or without us

Another one of those alarmist stories based on pure fantasy.

Newsflash: Ocean waters have cooled since 3,000 ocean based robots

started to send their measurements to satellites. What a head scratcher....

Global Warming stopped in 1998 and according to the latest scientific peer reviewed papers from University of Leipzig, Germany, Global Warming will halt until at least 2015, perhaps longer.

All warming between 1978 and 1998 that caused all the hysteria was wiped out in one swoop between Jan 2007 and Jan 2008. There you go.

Global Warming is now called Climate Change as you can conveniently go either way with that term.

Climate has changed for 4.5 billion years and will continue to do so, with or without wisdom from Al Gore, Prince Charles or that other Climate Specialists, high school drop-outs Leonardo Di Caprio and Cameron Diaz.

Francis @ May 21, 2008 14:10:13 PM

Man cannot regulate nature

The author appears to advocate that humans start regulating nature - forcing its behaviour to stay within certain prescribed control limits in order to preserve the current status quo. This is absurd. One ant cannot stop a herd of stampeding elephants.

Pierre Gosselin @ May 21, 2008 04:16:04 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

National Science Foundation

NSF

Wolves, Moose and Soil Nutrients: The Unexpected Connection

Researchers were startled to discover "hot spots" of forest fertility.

Predicting Who Will Survive Skin Cancer

Using new techniques, researchers may now be able to predict the survivability of skin cancer.

Record Highs Far Outpace Lows Across U.S.

Daily record high temperatures occurred twice as often as record lows over the past decade.

advertisement

Science Discoveries

Science Discoveries

iTunes icon RSS icon

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!