Tax Hikes, Fewer Benefits Key to Federal Deficit Crisis Fix

Americans feel anxiety without pause as millions fall out of the middle class

November 19, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (25)

The dominant mood in America today is one of anxiety without pause. Millions of decent, self-reliant, regular Americans who had begun to fear that the prolonged recession means the American dream is over for them now brood that their children and even their grandchildren are also to be denied the prospects of the good life they took for granted just a decade ago.

Once, the vast majority thought they were in the middle class, not rich and not poor. Today, more and more Americans are starting to identify themselves with lower economic groupings and see no prospects of moving higher, whether in terms of job opportunities or earnings. The fear has grown that years of hard work will no longer translate into a better life for themselves and their families. The new normal is that millions of them are facing the risk, or the reality, of falling out of the middle class, losing all that this once meant in America—financial independence, sending your kids to college, having equity in your home, choosing where you live. Today, people in their 20s are hard-pressed to get jobs, and those who do are taking them at incomes lower than they ever imagined. For those who are surviving as middle-class families, they are facing years of financial insecurity.

[See editorial cartoons about the economy.]

Middle-class wages are stagnating or worse. Median household income in the United States is now about $50,000 a year, 5 percent less than it was in 2000. There is a palpable sense of a country that is becoming more and more unequal. From 1989 to 2007, the top 1 percent of the population gained 56 percent of all income growth, while the bottom 90 percent gained just 16 percent. The only ones maintaining their financial standards are the educated upper classes. Middle-income families have been pressured by advancing technology, offshoring, and growing unemployment, and white-collar professionals have been forced into lower-paying or part-time work. As author Barbara Ehrenreich starkly put it, those between the ages of 40 and 50 are "too old to hire, too young to retire. . . . This is an apocalyptic situation."

The result is a widespread, populist anger in the country, mostly directed at Washington and at the Democrats. The Republicans not only won a majority in the House of Representatives in the midterm elections but had stunning success at the state level—not only new governorships but some 675 legislative seats, representing the biggest victory for any party in the state legislatures since 1938. The Republicans will now control 25 legislatures, compared to 14 before. The Democrats will now control only 16, compared to 27. The Republicans will have control of the governor's mansion and both legislative chambers in 20 states, compared to only nine before the midterms. Their success has been particularly evident in the industrial heartland states such as Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota.

[See a slide show of winners and losers from the midterm elections.]

The congressional Republicans promise to launch a full-scale attack on the federal deficits they helped to accumulate under the eight devil-may-care years of the George W. Bush presidency. They recognize that debt is a major feature of our downcast mood; accumulation of debt by the U.S. government is at a historically unprecedented and essentially unsustainable rate. Other than during and after World War II, the United States has not been so highly indebted since record-keeping began in 1792.

There are warning signs all around us of the dangers of America's breakdown of fiscal discipline. China downgraded its credit rating for American debt; South Korea refused a new trade deal; and the bulk of European and Asian nations joined in protest against the Federal Reserve's monetary policy of quantitative easing, which they interpret as printing more money to suppress the value of the dollar in order to make our exports more competitive in their countries.

Tags:
Congress,
2010 Congressional elections,
income tax,
health care reform,
unemployment,
Medicaid,
Democratic Party,
Medicare,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (25)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Mort, after months of hand wringing columns, you finally get around to telling us what you really want--A NATIONAL SALES TAX and bigger govt. You know as well as anyone that any reductions in income taxes to offset the sales tax increase will be short lived. After a while Washington will say we need more money and income taxes will start creeping back up (initially for only the rich, of course--look at the history of income taxes). The only way this sales tax could be marginally palatable is if we eliminate income taxes and replace it with your sales taxes. Given the choice, I would rather have a flat income tax to replace the current nightmare system thus eliminating the need for the monstrosity known as the IRS, the size of which will only increase trying to inforce your new sales tax. Here's a novel idea; just have the fed. govt. do what is allowed in the constitution and then you would be shocked how little revenue is required.

bud of MO 11:53AM November 29, 2010

If I don't have to pay income tax....which I don't now since I am living off of my life savings...but have to pay a 6.5% national sales tax and added gasoline tax, I would be being taxed on money that has already been taxed. Double taxation is not fair to those who have for all their working life paid their fair share of national government income tax whilt politicians were making foodlish and selfish financial decisions that have brought on this extreme national debt.

Once any tax is begun, there will be no eliminating it or stopping it from being increased. The gasoline tax you mention being increased is a good example.

Donna Farnsworth of NC 11:02AM November 28, 2010

Mr. Burns of FL. Please do not forget also that the feds have no business mettling in transportation. And so few are aware the insidious raping cast against the commerce clause...

Mike of UT 10:52PM November 27, 2010

advertisement

Debate Club

Should There Be Such a Thing as 'Reporter's Privilege'?

Experts debate the ability reporters to protect their sources even in the face of a government investigation.

Latest Videos

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

Reform Conservatives Need to Tackle Unemployment and Jobs

"Reform conservatives" are doing good work, but need to think about the ills of long-term unemployment.

If Background Checks are Good Enough for Guns, They're Good Enough for Jobs

Employers need to be able to consider all factors before making a hire.

NSA Leaker Edward Snowden Is Neither a Whistle-Blower Nor a Civil Disobeyer

Resisters who break a law must accept that they may be arrested and have a duty to submit to punishment.

Obama Should Bring Small Business Owners on His Trip to Africa

This country needs a national reality show.

Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.