The American Dream of Home Ownership Has Become a Nightmare

The disappearance of home equity value is a lead weight on the recovery

September 23, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Why has housing been such a core element in the story of American civilization?

Culturally a decent house has been a symbol of middle-class family life. Practically, it has been a secure shelter for the children, along with access to a good free education. Financially it has been regarded as a safe store of value, a shield against the vagaries of the economy, and a long-term retirement asset. Indeed, for decades, a house has been the largest asset on the balance sheet of the average American family. In recent years, it provided boatloads of money to homeowners through recourse to cash-out refinancing, in effect an equity withdrawal from their once rapidly appreciating home values.

These days the American dream of home ownership has turned into a nightmare for millions of families. They wake every day to the reality of a horrible decline in the value of the home that has meant so much to them. The pressure to meet mortgage payments on homes that have lost value has been especially shocking—and unjust—for the millions of unemployed through no fault of their own. For the baby boomer generation, a home is now seen not as the cornerstone of advancement but a ball and chain, restricting their ability and their mobility to move and seek out a job at another location. They just cannot afford to abandon the equity they have in their homes—and they can't sell in this miserable market.

American homeowners have experienced an unprecedented decline in their equity net of mortgage debt. The seemingly never-ending fall in prices has brought an average decline of at least 30 percent. Furthermore, the country is now going through an unprecedented nationwide slide in sales, despite the fact that long-term mortgage interest rates nationwide plummeted recently to a record low of 4.3 percent before rising slightly. The result is that home occupancy costs for home purchases are now down to roughly 15 percent of family income, dramatically lower than the conventional, affordable figure of 25 percent of family income devoted to home occupancy costs. Yet new home sales, pending home sales, and mortgage applications are down to a 13-year low.

[Read more of Mort Zuckerman's columns]

The economics of home ownership could hardly be more disastrously opposite to the expectations of generation after generation. Millions of homes have been foreclosed upon. About 11 million residential properties, or about 23 percent of such properties with mortgages, have mortgage balances that exceed the home's value. Given the total inventory, and the shadow inventory of empty homes, many experts expect prices to fall another 5 to 10 percent. That would bring the decline to 40 percent from peak-to-trough and expose an estimated 40 percent of homeowners to mortgages in excess of the value of their homes.

The growing risk of disappearing equity invites more strategic defaults on mortgages. Homeowners with negative equity are tempted simply to mail in their keys to their friendly lender even if they can afford the mortgage payment. Banks don't want to take the deflated properties onto their books because they will then have to declare a financial loss and still have to worry about maintaining the properties.

Little wonder foreclosure has not been enforced on a quarter of the people who haven't made a single mortgage payment in the last two years. A staggering 8 million home loans are in some state of delinquency, default, or foreclosure. Another 8 million homeowners are estimated to have mortgages representing 95 percent or more of the value of their homes, leaving them with 5 percent or less equity in their homes and thus vulnerable to further price declines. A huge percentage will never be able to catch up on their payment deficits.

The pace of foreclosures was briefly slowed by loan modifications brought on by government programs. Alas, the programs have not been working as hoped. Half of the borrowers have been redefaulting within 12 months, even after monthly payments were cut by as much as 50 percent. The foreclosure pipeline remains completely clogged. As it unclogs, a new wave of homes will come on the market and precipitate additional downward pressure on prices. The number of foreclosed homes put on the market by banks will be a more powerful influence on the further decline of home prices than either consumer demand or interest rates.

A well-balanced housing market has a supply of about five to six months. These days the supply is more than double that, as inventory backlog has surged to about a 12½ months' supply this summer, up from 8.3 months in May. This explains why average sale prices have been declining for so many, many months. The high end of the market, in particular, is under great pressure.

Tags:
unemployment,
subprime mortgages,
mortgages,
economy,
recession,
housing,
housing market

Reader Comments Read all comments (333)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The American dream is now the American nightmare, as fiscally qualified individuals are being denied the ability to buy or refinance homes; additionally, research shows that owning a home today is not as desirable as in the past.

A solution for the homeowner and the nation would be the implementation of a federal reserve bank for primary homeowners in America. This would give primary residence borrowers a chance to play on an even lending field. This would enable a controlled solution to an ungoverned problem. Implementing a federal reserve for American primary borrowers would cut out the middleman and make buying in America more affordable and based on true growth, not inflation from Wall Street.

These issues will affect the dreams of millions, and only their successful resolution can guarantee the market returning to a place where once again homeownership is a realistic goal for the average American. The factors and solutions discussed here are but simplifications of the overarching challenges faced by the nation’s housing market. A modern economy is not a static entity, and therefore must adapt and change in order to guarantee its future. These changes, in the form of regulation, are even today becoming reality.

Swade of IL 4:23PM November 03, 2010

Bill Clinton thought he could legislate out the lower income classes by making home ownership (via the availability of mortgages) more accessible to them. Noble idea, but extremely ignorant. Poor people are often poor because they don't manage their money well, and can barely make their minimal rent payments every month. They do not save money for a rainy day very well, either. Persuading these people to buy houses was a huge mistake. A house is a rainy day waiting to happen.

Clinton also persuaded middle class people to start taking out second mortgages on their houses, by making the interest tax deductible. That's why Americans had very little equity in their houses, and when the housing market tanked, they became upside down on their mortgage and couldn't afford to sell their house, as bizarre as that sounds.

Another thing that happened is Congress pushed American companies to send manufacturing jobs overseas, through heavy tax burdens, regulations, etc. Carol Browner, Clinton's head of the EPA, once tried to ban the chlorine molecule. CAFE standards pushed Ford into making Crown Vics and vans in Canada. Unions pushed Ford into making the Festiva in Mexico. Manufacturing in the U.S. was so bleak that retirement funds started investing heavily in China in the 1990's. In addition to losing billions of our retirement dollars, we also lost even more manufacturing jobs (and technology) to China.

The net effect was a booming housing market that propped up the economy for most of the last decade. Manufacturing took a back seat, and was not able to recover. Shady characters at major U.S. companies tried to cheat the system (and shareholders) with schemes like Enron's shell games, because there wasn't enough profit in honest manufacturing anymore.

Bush was too ignorant to put a stop to these things. Our economy may be a "mess", to quote Obama, but it didn't just get that way because of policies and mistakes in the last ten years (although Bush's ineptitude didn't help).

chem E of FL 12:23AM October 04, 2010

@DB of WA

"Finally you relax codes so people are free to build very small, simple dwellings for their own use.

My house isn't much but I built it myself and have never had a mortgage. I don't care what it is worth - I'm not selling. And If i decided to move I wouldn't need to sell. If more people could do this we would be moving back toward security."

EXACTLY! THANK YOU!

All this, 'Sorry but you'll need to build a 2300 sqft McMansion at MINIMUM in this area to meet the codes for housing' BS is NONSENSE!

Todd of IN 3:05PM October 03, 2010

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."