Obama's Anti-Business Policies Are Our Economic Katrina

His gratuitous and overstated demonization of business is exactly the wrong approach

July 16, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (167)

The growing divide and tension between the Obama administration and the business world is a cause for national concern. As Clive Crook wrote in the Financial Times, Obama is "a president under business attack." He is certainly under sharp criticism and for good reason: He has lost the confidence of much of the business community, whose worries over taxes, the dramatically increased costs of new regulation, and a general perception that the administration is hostile toward them and may take yet harsher steps, are holding back investment and growth. In the midst of a weak economy accompanied by levels of unemployment unprecedented since the Great Depression, it is critical that the government in Washington appreciate that confidence is an imperative if the business community is to invest, take risks with start-ups, and altogether get the economy going again to put the millions of unemployed back to productive work.

This is what businessmen do when they are free to conduct business. For example, in the two decades of the 1980s and 1990s, the United States created 73 million new private sector jobs—while simultaneously losing some 44 million jobs in the process of adjusting its economy to international competition. That was a net gain of some 29 million jobs. A stunning 55 percent of the total workforce at the end of these two decades was in a new job, some two-thirds of them in industries that paid more than the average wage. By contrast, continental Europe, with a larger economy and workforce, created an estimated 4 million jobs in the same period, most of which were in the public sector (and the cost of which they are beginning to regret).

How could America achieve this? It is because of the get-up-and-go culture that reflects individualism, courageous entrepreneurialism, pragmatism, adaptability, and innovation. This adventurous spirit outlived the passing of the frontier and still inspires and nourishes millions, including our young and our newcomers. No other country has a population so habituated to self-help, self-improvement, and even self-renovation in a manner that carries over into business life.

The unique historical conditions of America encouraged a remarkable management culture. The anthropologist, Lionel Tiger, showed that the style of American corporate management was a response to the opportunities of a huge internal market, but also the obstacles presented by vast distances and diverse populations. We created a monetized market economy inspired by a belief in technology and scientific management, governed not by kinship and custom but by contracts freely agreed upon and law passed by assent.

Over the years, the transformation of American industry has been nothing short of phenomenal. U.S. companies replaced large, mass-produced consumer products with sophisticated goods derived from intellectual output and knowledge-based interests, the fastest-growing segment of the world's economy. Management was assisted by a level of labor flexibility that is the envy of both Europe and Asia. Europe struggles with the legacy of the steam age in the form of craft, union, and management demarcations that limit management's role. In Asia, management is often stifled by large, oligopolistic networks and government mandates.

American managers consistently led the world in investing in new technologies and providing high-tech training to exploit them. We were the first to realize the importance of computers and information technologies and invested massively in them, spending twice as much per capita on info-tech as Western European firms and more than six times the global average. In fact, U.S. companies are the major suppliers of the information age's silicon, brains, and sinews.

No other country has met the requirements of an emerging economic system that needed people to be mobile both physically and psychologically. No other country shares America's belief in numbers and statistics as a basis for rational decision-making. No other country invests so much in business training and the retraining of its people—on top of having the world's best graduate and undergraduate business schools. No other country forms as many small companies year after year that compete with flexibility, rapid response, openness, innovation, and the ability to attract the best people. And as new products and services are developed, American businesses' unique marketing and advertising skills establish their success at home and abroad. Our system, in which ideas freely percolate at all levels, is tantamount to a giant information-processing machine. It enhances our capacity to absorb, adapt, and manage ongoing revolutions in technology, information, and logistics, which are too dynamic and complex to be handled by a top-down system.

The energy in business is matched by a unique and remarkable world of finance capital that over decades has identified the multiple sources of entrepreneurial funding. For example, our IPO process provides capital to service a merit-based, diversified financial environment and to fund young talent, new ideas, and the risks associated with high-tech, high-growth, high-concept companies.

Tags:
recession,
Barack Obama,
housing market,
economy,
SEC,
Congress,
Hurricane Katrina

Reader Comments Read all comments (167)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Explain the success of Facebook? Is this the model of business for the new millennium? If so, I will stick with my survivalist gear.

Nick of ID 12:26PM November 04, 2012

Of course the burden of rules are many... and some come with entire agencies to enforce them.

OSHA (and in California, businesses also have to deal with CalOSHA)

The EPA, etc.

Then there are major acts like the Social Security Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, The Family Leave Act, etc.

But these well known regulations are actually not nearly the bulk... the thousands of smaller and relatively unknown laws make up the bulk regulations, like sand on the beach.

Then there are the things that are so common that we forget that they are an expensive government imposition, for example:

The government mandates that companies become agents of the government, and act as tax collectors... keeping records and providing data, and collecting and transferring funds (as taxes from employees) directly to the government, and in turn provide information about the collection and the process to employees. (who hasn't received a W2 from an employer, mandated by government?) Entire departments are dedicated to this task in many companies... the office space, employees, data services, record storage etc. etc. all just to give the government what it wants with respect to EMPLOYEE tax collection, leaving aside the resources needed to comply with corporate taxation.

A simple example: the OMB estimated that environmental regulations costs went from 192 Million in 2001, to about 8 BILLION in 2008. (2001 dollars)... and the OMB admits that many environmental regulations were not included in this tally.

Dollars are of course only a proxy for "burden". The reality is that human thought, time, and action are required to address these laws... in other words, one has to actually DO something, and often times buy or create something (using resources) to comply with the laws. These activities are harder to measure than dollars, but one can keep them in mind when going over the dollar costs.

Of course I am only touching the tip of the iceberg here... but you get the idea.

Ryder of CA 2:08PM August 20, 2011

I have yet to see a list of all the horrible things the President wants business owners to do that forces you to move a business out of the US? Let me guess, he wants you to pay your bills and taxes in a timely manner (like private non-extremely wealthy citizens do) and not hide your cash in off shore accounts in the Caymans,Ireland etc? America is broke?

It only made 12 trillion last year.

Who could live on 12 trillion these days?

And those poor corporations. They're so oppressed. Why, things are so bad, they're sitting on two trillion dollars, after breaking all previous records for highest profits two years running. And taxes? Well, even though most corporations pay no taxes at all, we're still broke because of that tyrannical effective tax rate that brought in roughly 110 billion dollars on more than 1.5 TRILLION in profits.

Oh, and we only have 400 billionaires and just 5 million millionaires. Life's really tough for them, too, what with their 15% tax rates on capital gains and carried interest and their bank accounts in the Caymans. It must be awfully lonely for them these days, now that they're leaving the rest of us far behind, what with their control over more than 42% of all wealth in the country, and their share of the income pie going up to 25%.

Yep. America is broke. No way could we squeeze out another dime in taxes from billionaires, even though Americans paid just 9% of all of their income in taxes last year, and the Federal government took in just 14.8% of GDP . . . . and that counts corporate, personal, excise, gift, estate and payroll taxes.

See? Isn't it obvious that Americans are "taxed too much already"? Isn't it obvious that if Americans pay 9% of their income in taxes, there is no room left for even a penny more to be raised?Those wealthy Americans who control half the country's wealth don't pay income taxes. Their income is largely in the form of stock options and capital gain taxes (15% rate). Which they want eliminated! They pay a lower percentage than Repub voting dupes. The truth is, there were rich people during Eisenhower's day, during LBJ's day, during Nixon's day and during Clinton's day. Liberals aren't talking European style taxes, they're talking Clinton level taxes. You remember the 90s? 22 million jobs were added despite all that "confiscatory" tax....

Yep. We're flat busted.

roots of NY 10:12AM March 20, 2011

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Videos

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

House Republicans Waste Time With Obamacare Repeal Vote

Why is the House bothering to repeal Obamacare yet again?