Obama Needs to Focus on Housing, Not Health Reform

The housing crisis hasn’t gone away; it’s worse

February 26, 2010 RSS Feed Print

While eyes have been on the Winter Olympics, a menacing avalanche gathers force. Not in Vancouver but right here on our doorstep. Remember the housing crisis? It hasn't gone away. It's gotten graver.

Today, median prices for single-family houses nationwide are down by slightly more than 30 percent from their early 2006 peak. Over the near term, excess inventories are expected to push prices down by a further 10 percent.

The sheer number of empty homes overhanging the residential real estate market—7 million—points to lower prices. No fewer than 7.7 million homes and condos are behind on their mortgage payments. Over 4 million are now delinquent and going through some form of foreclosure. Fannie Mae's 90-day delinquency rate is now roughly 5.5 percent, double what it was a year ago. That shadow inventory sooner or later will hit the market. Furthermore, adjustable rate mortgages issued between 2004 and 2007—some $230 billion worth—are coming due, so the higher interest rates that are likely will mean more foreclosures. The average loan in foreclosure is 18.5 months overdue today, compared with 11 months a year ago.

Home sales are depressed, too, by competition from some 6 million vacant rental units, or 11 percent of supply. Homeowners have to contend with an apartment market where median asking rents declined by an estimated 3.5 percent over the past year—and that decline is accelerating.

Roughly 1 in 4 mortgages today exceeds the house's value. Remarkably, 1 in 15 mortgage delinquents is actually current on credit card debt. It's an unprecedented reflection of how much mortgages exceed home values. Consumers are just unwilling to put more money into their homes. Research shows that when a home's value falls below 75 percent of the outstanding mortgage debt, homeowners seriously think about walking away.

With declining prices beginning to hit the middle to higher ends of the housing market, we are looking at another foreclosure wave. Here's the gravity of the crisis: Roughly $750 billion of residential mortgages are upside down. That's equivalent to the entire fiscal stimulus program.

There's no cheer in new numbers, either. January's sales of new homes plunged by more than 11 percent month over month to an annual rate of 309,000 units, the weakest on record. Last March, the low was 332,000. Economist David Rosenberg reminds us that then, "everybody thought the world was coming to an end." Yes, indeed. Builders sold only 9,000 new homes in January. It now takes them a record 14.2 months to sell a finished house; in the boom years, it took approximately three months. Mortgage applications are at the lowest levels since May 2007.

The unsold backlog is now at roughly a 9.1-month supply, the highest overhang since last May, (up from the 8-month supply in December and the 7.3-month supply in October). The median price of new homes sank 5.6 percent month over month in January, to $203,500, the lowest level since December 2003, pushing more and more homeowners into a situation where they owe more than their real estate is worth.

Given that home equity has long been the largest asset on the balance sheet of the average American family, the government must urgently expand and simplify its unsuccessful Home Affordable Modification Program. It was designed to keep homeowners in their homes by adjusting their mortgages, but it has been a dud. Fewer than 70,000 homeowners have benefited. The program needs retrofitting because an empty foreclosed home generally incurs a 10 to 15 percent drop in value almost immediately, and it is the foreclosed home that determines the value of every home on the street.

If foreclosures soar out of control, we may be facing another crash. This avalanche is much more worthy of the administration's urgent attention than selling its expensively flawed healthcare plan. 

Tags:
Barack Obama,
economy,
housing,
housing market

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

As someone whom is involved in the foreclosure business on a day to day basic I can say that the issue is far worse than reported. I drive through neighborhoods with numerous vacant, newer homes which are not yet being marketed or processed. I am in the neighborhoods evaluating, already foreclosed homes.

I cannot imagine how the banks will be able to stay afloat with all these losses and I believe that things are much more serious than Obama or the main stream media which props him up are telling us.

D Chastain of OH 7:38PM May 22, 2010

I'm glad that the dogs have been turned loose on the scent of the beast that has cause the housing market(financial) problems. Good Luck and may God give you the Courage to follow the course

Frank Bradley of NC 10:37AM March 15, 2010

For some reason, many people (Republicans in general) believe that having a sixth of our economy tied up in healthcare is okay. It's not okay. It is morally and economically indefensible.

I don't like the healthcare reform bill, but the fact there were no facts debated, in fact no real debate, has been very disheartening.

For too long our politicians have been wrapped up in making history, ignoring history in the process. Here's a example...

HMOs came into existence a little over 30 years ago, because insurance companies, which were actually ethical and financial sound due to real regulation, were getting out of the losing health care business. HMOs pool insureds... much of the same kind of arguments were are hearing today as saviors to "the system."

HMOs actually did a fairly good job in those early years, but then something happened. These HMOs, which were non-profits, became incorporated and started selling stock, even though there is no economically sound reason to do so.

HMOs in those early years were succeeding. They were paying out 94 cents of every premium dollar to the medical expenses of its insureds. The six cents provided for overhead and profit. However, today, HMOs are paying out around 81 cents toward claims--a medical loss ratio of 0.81, with the remainder for overhead and profit. This is on trillions of dollars in premiums, and by my math, nearly fifteen cents is getting gobbled up by executive compensation and Wall Street, mostly hedge funds.

This system is immoral. Americans are paying twice what other industrialized countries are paying for healthcare, their results are better and everyone is insured. An perfect example of the immorality of system, beyond 45,000 Americans dying each year without coverage, is the greed of CEOs like the head of United Health Group, Bill McGuire, who took $800 milllion out of the company for himself--he would have taken $1.6 billion were it not for his getting his hands slapped for back-dating options.

America, like the media that writes such columns as this, is corrupt.

carl lee of MN 10:00AM March 09, 2010

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.

To Avoid a Failed February, Mitt Romney Needs a Big Idea

Mitt Romney needs a big idea to rouse enthusiasm for his campaign.

How Mitt Romney Should Respond to the Improving Economy

Even if the economy continues to improve, Mitt Romney still can present a better plan than Barack Obama's.

The Problems With the Catholic Church and Birth Control

The Catholic Church's stance on birth control is a slippery slope, as an Obama administration ruling highlights.

Democrats Rebelling Against Obama Birth Control Policy

Some Democrats are among most publicly opposed the an Obama policy requiring religious institutions to cover contraceptives.

Catholic Birth Control Fight About Healthcare, Not Just Religion

The framing of the issue of required contraceptive coverage in religious terms obscures the real question.

Rick Santorum's Sweep Means It’s Still Anybody’s Race

The GOP finds itself in the unusual position of not being sure who its nominee will eventually be.